Started By
Message

re: Which schools surprise you having low recuriting rankings

Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:34 pm to
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64343 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:34 pm to
Surprised Stanford isn't more desirable. Beautiful area, great coach, great degree, pro system.
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32741 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Surprised Stanford isn't more desirable. Beautiful area, great coach, great degree, pro system.

yeah I'd pick it over Notre Dame if I was looking for something like that.
Posted by SDwhodat
Member since Apr 2007
2549 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 4:44 pm to
Who wants to play in front of essentially no one
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18986 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Surprised Stanford isn't more desirable. Beautiful area, great coach, great degree, pro system.

Ugh this is so stupid. Just because some dudes behind a computer didn't rank their players high means that Stanford isn't desirable? What were Toby Gerhart and Richard Sherman ranked?
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98305 posts
Posted on 2/6/13 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Surprised Stanford isn't more desirable. Beautiful area, great coach, great degree, pro system.


Stanford has to take guys that can get in school. Even if the admissions office cuts them some slack, most blue chippers aren't gonna qualify.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram