- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newsflash: Claiborne and Tyrann were not diamonds in the rough
Posted on 1/20/13 at 6:50 pm to TigerDat
Posted on 1/20/13 at 6:50 pm to TigerDat
quote:
Well when you are less that a 4* which I think both were then yea normally you are reffered to as a diamond in the ruff. They had athletecism but needed to be polished.
No. True diamonds in the rough are 2 stars or less.
1
Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:02 pm to lynxcat
It's semantics.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News