- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Attorney Question???
Posted on 1/18/13 at 11:57 am to OTIS2
Posted on 1/18/13 at 11:57 am to OTIS2
quote:
I wouldn't do that, if I were you, without a proper factual foundation.
You shouldn't try to sue anyone without a "proper factual foundation." That goes without saying. If you get into discovery and its evident that there is no cause of action against the owner then you drop it. Are you suggesting someone is going to get sanctioned over suing the owner in the facts given?
1
Posted on 1/18/13 at 12:08 pm to rmc
I can't state a cause of action against an owner without alleging facts that support liability. We know just stating that "Defendant X,as the owner of the subject vehicle, is obligated to Paintiffs" is not worth the ink used to print the sentence. I add owners when I can support the claim, and only when I can support the claim,whether at filing or later by amendment.
This post was edited on 1/18/13 at 12:10 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News