- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
anyone else think django was just.... ok?
Posted on 12/28/12 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 12/28/12 at 6:44 pm
I cant put my finger on it exactly but I had such high expectations going into it, when I left I felt let down.
Not his best work, but its no death proof either.
Im not sure what it was but the acting seemed off to me for some reason. First time we see sam jackson he is stuttering amd stuff then in the library he is spoken like a rhodes scholar.
I thought sam l Jackson was the best part of the movie.
Overall B-
Still better than 99% of the shite Hollywood puts out now adays, so definitely worth your money
Not his best work, but its no death proof either.
Im not sure what it was but the acting seemed off to me for some reason. First time we see sam jackson he is stuttering amd stuff then in the library he is spoken like a rhodes scholar.
I thought sam l Jackson was the best part of the movie.
Overall B-
Still better than 99% of the shite Hollywood puts out now adays, so definitely worth your money
9
Posted on 12/28/12 at 6:46 pm to Wooly
quote:probably the reason why
I had such high expectations going into it
Posted on 12/28/12 at 6:57 pm to Wooly
No
Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:00 pm to Wooly
quote:
Im not sure what it was but the acting seemed off to me for some reason. First time we see sam jackson he is stuttering amd stuff then in the library he is spoken like a rhodes scholar.
I believe this was done on purpose. He is supposed to just be the head house slave, but in all reality he is the brains behind Candyland.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:18 pm to Wooly
quote:
Im not sure what it was but the acting seemed off to me for some reason. First time we see sam jackson he is stuttering amd stuff then in the library he is spoken like a rhodes scholar.
Honestly, he, not Candy, is the main antagonist of the film. If it weren't for him, there would be little antagonism between Candy, Django, and Waltz.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:28 pm to Wooly
I thought it was good, not great. 7.5/10. Will watch again.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:46 pm to Wooly
I thought the previews looked pretty bad, so I didn't go see it.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 9:59 pm to Wooly
quote:
Im not sure what it was but the acting seemed off to me for some reason. First time we see sam jackson he is stuttering amd stuff then in the library he is spoken like a rhodes scholar.
Did you miss the part where he was doing book keeping?
Posted on 12/28/12 at 10:10 pm to Wooly
It wasn't a great movie. It was a good movie, though. It needed a lot more editing.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 10:37 pm to Wooly
I just thought it was ok as well. Entertaining but it was great or anything IMO.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News