- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Total Recall - The new crappy one
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:05 am
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:05 am
Got it last night at redbox. Thank the good lord that they cast two extremely hot women in the movie. If I had to choose btw a world where I "think" I'm married and bang Kate B every night versus any other world. Call me stupid, I'm staying in that world.
From an action movie stand point, it wasn't terrible, but as far as story and everything else. Mehh.
From an action movie stand point, it wasn't terrible, but as far as story and everything else. Mehh.
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:25 am to NS Who Dat Nation
It was a CFR - a Colin Farrell Remake. That's all that needs to be said.
This reminds me of Walton and Johnson yesterday. They were talking about Dennis Quaid movies and the fact they just about all have "too much Quaid". His brother, Randy, OTOH, always delivers "just the right amount of Quaid". I must be losing IQ points because I'm finding these twits funny, when I used to find them unlistenable.
This reminds me of Walton and Johnson yesterday. They were talking about Dennis Quaid movies and the fact they just about all have "too much Quaid". His brother, Randy, OTOH, always delivers "just the right amount of Quaid". I must be losing IQ points because I'm finding these twits funny, when I used to find them unlistenable.
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:27 am to NS Who Dat Nation
So if a movie tries to pay homage to an older film AND follow the book more closely than the original film, it's automatically a failure...
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:36 am to Pectus
I just dont like these movies where they shoot 90% of it and dont spend enough time on character developement, dialogue, etc...It was more like, hey here's a hot chick, let her shoot and fight for the rest of the movie.
edit: Wait, there's a book?
edit: Wait, there's a book?
This post was edited on 12/19/12 at 10:37 am
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:39 am to NS Who Dat Nation
quote:
Wait, there's a book?
All science fiction movies are based on Philip K. Dick books. Fact.
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:48 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:
All science fiction movies are based on Philip K. Dick books. Fact.
Not all of them, but damn near close. You lump in Asimov, you'll pretty much cover the rest.
Posted on 12/19/12 at 11:48 am to NS Who Dat Nation
quote:
Wait, there's a book?
It's a short story by Philip K. Dick, I think it's called We Can Remember it for you Wholesale.
The main character in the book is Quail, and not Quaid.
Posted on 12/19/12 at 11:54 am to Chimlim
quote:
The main character in the book is Quail, and not Quaid.
Quail Man!!!!
Posted on 12/19/12 at 11:59 am to Pectus
quote:
So if a movie tries to pay homage to an older film AND follow the book more closely than the original film, it's automatically a failure...
I doubt they were playing homage to anything except trying to make $$.
Posted on 12/19/12 at 12:09 pm to Chimlim
That's correct.
Aside from Kate B's arse, the new one sucked.
Aside from Kate B's arse, the new one sucked.
Posted on 12/19/12 at 12:37 pm to Pectus
quote:
pay homage
Is this what we call hollywood execs with no original thoughts are doing these days?
Posted on 12/19/12 at 12:37 pm to elprez00
quote:
You lump in Asimov
I can only think of two movies based off of Asimov's fiction: Bicentennial Man and I, Robot. And I don't think that I, Robot really counts. What else is out there?
Posted on 12/19/12 at 12:43 pm to quail man
quote:
you called?
Yeeeeeees!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News