- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Okay, explain to me what the frick just happend/Hou at Det penalty call
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:06 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:06 pm to Fun Bunch
Wtf? Butt hurt for asking questions? I could give a shite about either team. I didn't k.ow coaches randomly throwing their challenges out without cause was a huge problem in football
0
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:06 pm to TheSexecutioner
People need to start blaming Scwartz. He knows the rule and it's in place for a reason. He doesn't do what he's not supposed to and it's overturned.
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:07 pm to TheSexecutioner
quote:
A coach reacting on pure emotion isn't an excuse. He's getting paid millions to be the one guy on the sideline who can't lose his wits.
The refs are getting payed outrageous amounts of money to get an easy call like that correct
quote:
Plus, it can be used as an unfair tactic to extend the amount of time that the booth has to review it.
No one thinks they didn't deserve a penalty
No way should that null a review from the booth. Hell, take a time out, give them 15 yards, but review the damn play
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:07 pm to TheSexecutioner
I agree there should be a 15 yard penalty if a coach throws a challenge flag in that situation.
However,
Making the play unreviewable flies in the face of all logic. The purpose is to get every call correct. That did not happen here and the NFL has made a rule that doesn't allow a call to be corrected. That is awful.
However,
Making the play unreviewable flies in the face of all logic. The purpose is to get every call correct. That did not happen here and the NFL has made a rule that doesn't allow a call to be corrected. That is awful.
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:07 pm to Tigerbait337
@FO_ASchatz: I love that idea. If you're a coach, why wouldn't you challenge your own game-winning TD in the final minute to prevent a review?
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:08 pm to Fun Bunch
The penalty is fine... But it shouldn't allow refs to get away with a horrific arse call. Review it anyway.
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:08 pm to Fun Bunch
Plenty are blaming him. People are asking why its a rule you dumb frick
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:09 pm to bamafan425
Cause dumbass the CHALLENGER CAN'T BENEFIT if the other coach reviewed it it would be non issue
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:10 pm to GhostBuster6
Chill out man.
I was just asking. Haven't read all five pages of this. It's Thanksgiving. Other stuff to do.
I was just asking. Haven't read all five pages of this. It's Thanksgiving. Other stuff to do.
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:10 pm to wope
Somewhere Donovan McNabb is laughing at Schwartz for not knowing such an obvious rule.
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:11 pm to GhostBuster6
Apparently Matt's baby is a future ref in the league...
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:11 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
People need to start blaming Scwartz. He knows the rule and it's in place for a reason. He doesn't do what he's not supposed to and it's overturned.
Looks like you have a bad case of not being able to see the forest for the trees.
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:11 pm to bamafan425
quote:
If you're a coach, why wouldn't you challenge your own game-winning TD in the final minute to prevent a review?
GENIUS
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:11 pm to GhostBuster6
But if the flag itself is the penalty which makes it unreviewable what's it matter what bench flag came from
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:12 pm to GhostBuster6
quote:
Cause dumbass the CHALLENGER CAN'T BENEFIT if the other coach reviewed it it would be non issue
so why not give them the penalty and review the play anyway?
you can't answer that. Becuase there is no answer. The rule is fricking dumb and so are you
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:12 pm to GhostBuster6
You have to look at the ruling in two parts:
1. Lions get penalized for throwing the challenge flag.
2. You can't benefit on a ruling after a penalty called on you.
Both were called correctly and individually are not terrible rules, but it seems illogical when happening together.
1. Lions get penalized for throwing the challenge flag.
2. You can't benefit on a ruling after a penalty called on you.
Both were called correctly and individually are not terrible rules, but it seems illogical when happening together.
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:13 pm to Tigerbait337
quote:
The refs are getting payed outrageous amounts of money to get an easy call like that correct
i'ma bet it was a case of the guy who was supposed to make the call wasn't 100% sure, so he didn't blow the whistle and thought someone else would. that someone else wasn't sure. and it was very quickly contagious and turned into a, "Well, we get to review this shite anyway, let him run." Always better to let the play continue.
And then Schwartz went derp.
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:13 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
you can't answer that. Becuase there is no answer. The rule is fricking dumb and so are you
I really just don't know why it's in place and why it's so severe.
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:14 pm to quail man
Would be even a bigger deal and lol posters everywhere if it was replacement refs
Posted on 11/22/12 at 2:15 pm to Tigerbait337
quote:
A coach pulling a boneheaded move out of pure emotion (that was justified) shouldn't result in 7 points, EVER
I don't even know what to say. What do you think this guy is getting paid to do? It is absolutely inexcusable for anybody collecting that kind of salary to botch something that important.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News