- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Engagement Rings
Posted on 11/9/12 at 6:20 pm to bryso
Posted on 11/9/12 at 6:20 pm to bryso
quote:
can you give some bullet points on that?
Everyone talks about the 4 c's but there is more to it than that and some are more important than others. A stone can be 1ct but face up (have the appearance from the top down) of a larger or smaller stone. There are different places that grade stones GIA is the top dog, other grade the same as GIA, and other grade softer. If you by a stone with an from certain other labs they typically grade 2-4 color grades softer compared to GIA and will be priced less. You want to make sure your are comparing apples to apples. Tons of good info on that site and a list of trusted vendors you can by over the Internet with confidence. If you are buying over state lines no sales tax, etc...
2
Posted on 11/9/12 at 6:22 pm to wickowick
whats your opinion on blue nile and james allen
Posted on 11/12/12 at 12:38 pm to wickowick
Excuse my ignorance, but as long as the ring is flawless to the human eye, why is it important to get the best clarity, cut, etc?? I know a nicer diamond will hold its value and increase in value better but it's not like I would be returning the thing and she sure as hell wont be looking at it under a microscope. I feel like a woman would be happier with a bigger diampnd that has "flaws" that cant be seen by the human eye than a flawless smaller diamond
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News