- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Asking Mett to run Miles offense vs. designing an offense around Mett.
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:30 pm
I think this is our biggest issue. Our offense isn't designed around Mett's strengths so he struggles to run it. IMO he has slow footwork. We need more shotgun, more 2 RB sets (we actually saw success with this vs UF) and less I-form and under center sets. I know this is bc we have such great RB's but we should use these sets later in the game and mix them in early.
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:31 pm to tigereye58
quote:
We need more shotgun
Yep. He got sacked on a 3 step drop one time. That is just sad.
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:32 pm to tigereye58
We designed the offense around JJ then kept it when we got a QB with a great arm. Mett's confidence is now shot.
Still, I know in my gut that he will be awesome if we just let him start slinging it. He's a guy that plays best when his ego is thru the roof.
Still, I know in my gut that he will be awesome if we just let him start slinging it. He's a guy that plays best when his ego is thru the roof.
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:32 pm to HMTVBrian2
quote:
thanks coach
Thanks for reading. You're an idiot. Why are you on this board. Go sign the fire les miles petition and leave the constructive threads to the actual fan's and alumni.
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:33 pm to HMTVBrian2
quote:
thanks coach
What a jackass response. This is a message board for discussion. I agree with the OP. shotgun 2 back sets with way more screens and draws has to be our primary set.
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:34 pm to tigereye58
I probably know more about football than you, actually.
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:35 pm to RonFNSwanson
quote:
Yep. He got sacked on a 3 step drop one time. That is just sad.
Looked like that was on Ware
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:36 pm to HMTVBrian2
quote:
probably
Spells confidence right there. If you know football then talk football. Tell me why you agree or disagree. Show me what you know. I don't claim to know everything but I'm here to discuss the team I love. Not trade one liners with losers lurking the board.
This post was edited on 10/7/12 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:38 pm to RonFNSwanson
quote:
Yep. He got sacked on a 3 step drop one time. That is just sad.
I think we are trying to run a quick slant on a 3 step drop often. I think some of this is Mett changing the play at the line but its now known that we like to do this. The pocket collapses too fast on him and we end up with nothing. He doesn't have time to progress through the receivers.
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:38 pm to HMTVBrian2
quote:
thanks coach
Gtfo pussy
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:40 pm to Powerman
quote:
Looked like that was on Ware
No it was the O-line
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:42 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
Still, I know in my gut that he will be awesome if we just let him start slinging it. He's a guy that plays best when his ego is thru the roof.
Um. Sling it to who exactly?
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:44 pm to HMTVBrian2
quote:
thanks coach
the OP was actually a pretty decent, well thought out point, unlike most rant posts.
Posted on 10/7/12 at 1:54 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
the OP was actually a pretty decent, well thought out point, unlike most rant posts.
Thanks. Any other thoughts? Has anyone noticed any similarities in the successful plays. I wish I had DVR-ed all the games so I could go back and compare our different formations and our completion % for each and sacks for each.
Popular
Back to top
3








