- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Crackpot ASOIAF Theories SPOILERS
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:08 pm to skirpnasty
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:08 pm to skirpnasty
good shite going on in here.
I wish on the old gods and the new that I could get my bf into the books so we could discuss it. At least I got him on the show...finally finished season 1...he keeps saying how much he hates Joff. GAH I can't wait for his death on screen!
I wish on the old gods and the new that I could get my bf into the books so we could discuss it. At least I got him on the show...finally finished season 1...he keeps saying how much he hates Joff. GAH I can't wait for his death on screen!
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:16 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
Was Selmy there too? If so, this becomes much less likely IMO. No way Barristan the Bold would have missed spotting Arthur Dayne.
Easy enough to disguise yourself though, especially when nobody has seen you for 15 years. Not to mention him being dressed as a Bard and not a Knight. Plus if Val has any kind of magical abilities like a lot of people think he could have been glamoured to look like someone else completely. Larger feats have been accomplished in this series than sneaking into a feast. He was down bottom with the children too so nowhere near the kings guard.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:20 pm to Tiger Voodoo
I thought Barristan was still in King's Landing?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:21 pm to skirpnasty
This theory is awesome, probably my favorite crack pot one. How epic would it be for Mance/Arthur Dayne to be fricking Bolton/Freys up in Winterfell?
eta: does anyone else remember how you have to become king beyond the wall? you have to pretty much best every leader around north of the wall in combat or some other form. Mance did that. According to Tormund he also slew 50-100 wights. at the very least he is no ordinary former black brother.
eta: does anyone else remember how you have to become king beyond the wall? you have to pretty much best every leader around north of the wall in combat or some other form. Mance did that. According to Tormund he also slew 50-100 wights. at the very least he is no ordinary former black brother.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:35 pm to NIH
Yeah Mance is a bad arse, my original crack pot was that he is Rhaegar. Some things like the wildling woman patching his black cloak with scarlet red let me to be think that, I did some research and that idea doesn't hold up for a lot of different reasons. I wonder though, if he is the sword of the morning, where is his great sword Dawn? Would it be in winterfell in the crypts possibly?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:36 pm to skirpnasty
I thought Ned had returned it. Maybe Darkstar now has it?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:36 pm to NIH
quote:
This theory is awesome, probably my favorite crack pot one. How epic would it be for Mance/Arthur Dayne to be fricking Bolton/Freys up in Winterfell?
200 pages
This thread just got a much needed kick in the pants.
GRRM is gonna be PISSED!! That's what he gets for making us wait 7 years per book.
Mothafrickas got ideas too George!!
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 3:38 pm to skirpnasty
While I think this theory is cool, all of these hidden characters thing could get out of hand. Most of these are crackpot, but having so many people written as one character while actually being another would almost feel like GRRM was being disingenuous.
For instance, never in Ned's narration does he say he didn't kill the 3 Kingsguard. It was a little frustrating being in Tyrion's head in ACOK and never knowing his plans for the chain, but this would be much worse.
Yes, he never comes out and says that Jon isn't his son in his own head, but he also never says that he is, in his own mind.
For instance, never in Ned's narration does he say he didn't kill the 3 Kingsguard. It was a little frustrating being in Tyrion's head in ACOK and never knowing his plans for the chain, but this would be much worse.
Yes, he never comes out and says that Jon isn't his son in his own head, but he also never says that he is, in his own mind.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:03 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
Well Barriston is still around and Mormont is older, and the ones defending Westeros now aren't exactly children. You have to remember that in the time setting most people died before they saw 40. Jon is considered a grown arse man at this point and Stannis is probably 35.
I meant children as in they were the generation after the great knights died who grew up hearing of their valor. Selmy isn't in Westeros and I honestly don't think he'll ever see it again.
No one has ever accused Mormont of being a great Knight either. Really all you have left is Jaime Lannister who is crippled and in most peoples eyes has shite for honor.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:26 pm to CottonWasKing
That's my point, there are new knights in the makings. Knights of every generation just as before. If you read Dunk and Egg it's the same way, old knights are scarce because of the backfire rebellion just as now they are scarce due to the Baratheon rebellion. New great knights are in the making, Brienne is a great example.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:27 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
Yeah Mance is a bad arse, my original crack pot was that he is Rhaegar. Some things like the wildling woman patching his black cloak with scarlet red let me to be think that, I did some research and that idea doesn't hold up for a lot of different reasons. I wonder though, if he is the sword of the morning, where is his great sword Dawn? Would it be in winterfell in the crypts possibly?
Ned returned it to dorne. It hasn't been wielded by anyone since Arthur
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:28 pm to skirpnasty
Brienne, Gendry, Jon(not a knight-but a hero), etc.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:30 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
That's my point, there are new knights in the makings. Knights of every generation just as before. If you read Dunk and Egg it's the same way, old knights are scarce because of the backfire rebellion just as now they are scarce due to the Baratheon rebellion. New great knights are in the making, Brienne is a great example.
And that's my point as well. This is their story. Their great war. Their chance at greatness. Dayne being alive tarnishes that in my mind. Plus I like the idea of him being a true knight of the kingsguard and paying the ultimate sacrifice for his vows. Laying his life down in the defense of his king.
It's a great theory. Extremely unique and well thought out I just hope it turns out false.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:34 pm to CottonWasKing
quote:
And that's my point as well. This is their story. Their great war. Their chance at greatness. Dayne being alive tarnishes that in my mind. Plus I like the idea of him being a true knight of the kingsguard and paying the ultimate sacrifice for his vows. Laying his life down in the defense of his king.
To be fair, yielding to Ned and allowing him to hide Jon is the only way he could have ever truly protected him. Not doing so would have basically been a death sentence.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:39 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
To be fair, yielding to Ned and allowing him to hide Jon is the only way he could have ever truly protected him. Not doing so would have basically been a death sentence.
A death sentence Arthur Dayne would've welcomed by all accounts. He was an intelligent man. He knew the war was over and that he had lost Rhaegar, Aerys and would soon lose Jon as well. Yet he swore a vow, a vow he took very seriously. Death Dayne could've accepted but handing Rhaegars son over to Rhaegars enemies wouldn't have been an option for him. Even though Dayne liked and respected Ned Stark they were still Rhaegars enemies.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 5:00 pm to CottonWasKing
quote:
Death Dayne could've accepted but handing Rhaegars son over to Rhaegars enemies wouldn't have been an option for him.
Ned was the only person in Westeros with the desire and opportunity to protect Jon.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 5:04 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Ned was the only person in Westeros with the desire and opportunity to protect Jon.
He was also best friends with the guy who was responsible for wiping out every targaryen left in Westeros.....
Posted on 11/13/12 at 5:12 pm to CottonWasKing
That's true, but I'm thinking Dayne would have placed a much higher value on Jon's survival than his own. And Ned was the only option.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 5:53 pm to CottonWasKing
I like the theory of Mance as arthur Dayne but lets take it a step further. Mance is jon father and instead of L+J it's Lyana and Arthur Dayne and Rhaegers son is from Ashara Dayne
Posted on 11/13/12 at 6:12 pm to CottonWasKing
quote:
And that's my point as well. This is their story. Their great war. Their chance at greatness. Dayne being alive tarnishes that in my mind
What about Stannis? He's certainly an "old knight" in that he was critical in the Rebellion. Davos as well.
I understand they aren't knights per se, but their roles straddle both times and draw the conflicts together.
Selmy as well obviously.
That said, I can understand and respect your feeling on this. I don't share it, but it's certainly a valid reason to root against this theory.
My biggest difference with you though, is that ultimately this war isn't going to be about the Iron Throne. It's going to be about The Others and the longest winter.
At the time Dayne would have agreed to take the black, he may have felt confident that leaving JS with Ned was actually the BEST way to protect him, since Robert trusted Ned and would believe whatever Ned told him about Jon's identity. Plus, he would live, in the event JS needed him down the road.
Which is exactly what has happened. There is a whole shitstorm coming that perhaps the Sword of the Morning was meant to help vanquish. In fact, it would seem almost trivial for the greatest knight that ever lived to serve his days protecting a horrible king and dying over some scorned rebel like Robert over a random Northern woman.
But Dayne/Mance at this point isn't as concerned about some feud for control of the Seven Kingdoms, but for the survival of the realm itself. Which is more fitting for a hero of his stature.
Dayne can leave the "new knights" to handle their war and chance at greatness. But once that's done, the REAL shite is going to hit the fan. THIS is his war, not Roberts Rebellion.
And to deal with that, the new and the old will need to come together to survive.
This does bring up a question I've wondered about though which I'm sure has an actual answer. I just don't remember the details.....
We know the Mountain was very involved in Roberts Rebellion, as he was there for "Aegon's" demise.
What about The Hound? Do we know what his role was at that time? Also, was the Mountain involved in battles before KL?
Just curious as to what the Cleganes were doing during this great rebellion.
Also, did I miss what the Greyjoys were doing? Balon, Euron, and Victarion?
If the Cleganes and Greyjoys were involved, that would make the "new knight" problem less relevant if all of these guys were also players in that rebellion.
TIA
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 6:53 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News