- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What is considered a dynasty?
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:00 pm
Would you have called the Bulls a dynasty if they had only had the first three peat?
What about the Spurs and their 4?
I ask because if SC wins and advances to the CWS Final and wins. A three peat national champion. Are they considered one? Or is it four or more?
What about the Spurs and their 4?
I ask because if SC wins and advances to the CWS Final and wins. A three peat national champion. Are they considered one? Or is it four or more?
9
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:00 pm to WicKed WayZ
I'd definitely consider this a dynasty (SCAR)
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:02 pm to WicKed WayZ
a team that dominates a league for multiple years consecutively imo.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:04 pm to The Easter Bunny
Yeah I think if you win 3 in say 3-6 years you're a dynasty. Like the Patriots and their three. Edmonton Oilers with 5 in 7 years. Spurs, Celtics with Bill Russell and so on.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:10 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Yeah I think if you win 3 in say 3-6 years you're a dynasty.
I kige this. Even a slightly longer time period (like the Niners of the 1980s winning 4 in 10 years) as long as you have a few of the core people the whole way through and not a completely different team.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:10 pm to WicKed WayZ
USCw in football. Oh wait...
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:18 pm to WicKed WayZ
If they pull it off, they'll do something no one except USC has done. WPS
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:21 pm to WicKed WayZ
carolina winning 3 in a row would be a dynasty.
im for arizona tho
im for arizona tho
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:22 pm to WicKed WayZ
The Spurs' run is intriguing. Four in nine seasons. Four is a lot, but it's spread over a decade. I'd say yes, though, in today's era with free agency and expansion.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:24 pm to mattz1122
quote:
The Spurs' run is intriguing. Four in nine seasons. Four is a lot, but it's spread over a decade. I'd say yes, though, in today's era with free agency and expansion
Basically the same as the 49ers then.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:28 pm to Bestbank Tiger
I consider the 49ers a dynasty so I called the Spurs one
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:32 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Three over ten years qualifies as long as you were still a top team in most of the years you didn't win.
This post was edited on 6/22/12 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:32 pm to WicKed WayZ
The Spurs don't get enough credit because they're a smaller market and never repeated.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 10:46 pm to USMC Gators
The Spurs were most definitely a dynasty and they still might have a year or two left in their window if last year is any indication.
A WCF appearance is nothing to scoff at.
A WCF appearance is nothing to scoff at.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 11:01 pm to WicKed WayZ
Posted on 6/22/12 at 11:07 pm to Dro
More of a dynasty than the OTHER USC team that tried to claim a three-peat.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 11:26 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
I ask because if SC wins and advances to the CWS Final and wins. A three peat national champion.
I guess my dynasties harken to the word dynasty, which if we consider the Ming dynasty, went on for centuries.
so three does not make it.
1. The New York Yankees. multiple extended runs at the top.
Not just your 1920's Ruth Gehrig Yankees.
Not just your Mickey Mantle Yogi Berra Whitey Ford Yankees
Every decade has had Yankee champions.
Most decades had multiple year Yankee Champions.
When Pittsburgh got the Maseroski HR, they needed a bad bounce into Tresh's throat and an extra innings win. In most of the games the Yankees won, light hitting Richardson had more RBI's than the entire Pittsburgh team.
They were mighty, forever. The Pittsburgh win was like beating Dracula. I was in a dorm in Lake Charles for the Mazeroski HR.
The whole room was full of southerners except me.
You would have thought they learned the south really did win the civil war.
2. UCLA Wooden. Amazing. Aided by 4 years of servitude of Alcindor, and then Walton, and then Wicks and Rowe, they won 10 in a 12 year period. Dynasty.
Ming, Yankees, UCLA.
The rest are chopped liver, in the USA.
Montreal Canadiens were also, in hockey.
In lower classes of college divisions, some coaches/teams have won some NAIA or D-II sport a zillion years in a row.
Posted on 6/22/12 at 11:52 pm to ottothewise
In a five year period of winning a championship for three years
Say from 01-05
Team A wins 03,02,04
DYNASTY
Say from 01-05
Team A wins 03,02,04
DYNASTY
Posted on 6/22/12 at 11:52 pm to WicKed WayZ
If you focus on being one of the top teams of an era, then the Bills of the early 90s are a dynasty.
Posted on 6/23/12 at 2:29 am to WicKed WayZ
a 3 peat or more consecutively is an automatic dynasty.
4 or more, not necessarily consecutively within 7 years is a dynasty.
Your team, in other words has to dominate the decade in similar fashion to this ^
4 or more, not necessarily consecutively within 7 years is a dynasty.
Your team, in other words has to dominate the decade in similar fashion to this ^
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News