Started By
Message
locked post

Cowherd says the punishment is for the plot, not the actions.....

Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:26 pm
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43316 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:26 pm
"You can get arrested for plotting to kill the President, even without killing the president." He said Saints fans who are saying there is no proof of injured players are off-base and delusional. The punishment is for the plot, not actually carrying out the plot.

What do you make of this thought process?
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
21010 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:28 pm to
Sounds about right to me
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

What do you make of this thought process?


I stopped thinking about his thought processes a long time ago.
Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22096 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

The punishment is for the plot, not actually carrying out the plot.
Thats not what the NFL says.
Posted by SaintLSUnAtl
THE REAL MJ
Member since Jan 2007
22129 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:37 pm to
typical cowherd is typical
Posted by LSU=Champions
BAWxtard | Tier 1
Member since Apr 2004
22257 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:39 pm to
I mean, it's an analogy. But I wouldn't say it's a good analogy.

Plotting to kill our nation's leader =/= rewards for hard hits
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119336 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

"You can get arrested for plotting to kill the President, even without killing the president." He said Saints fans who are saying there is no proof of injured players are off-base and delusional. The punishment is for the plot, not actually carrying out the plot.

What do you make of this thought process?



Bad analogy. There is a big difference between "I'm going to kill that em effer" on the football field than there is "I'm going to kill that em effer" IRL. Context is everything.

The Saints were spewing football rhetoric. If the rhetoric resulted into breaking game rules then the words spoken were not rhetoric. Otherwise the words were for motivational effect only.

Did the Saints words lead to breaking the rules of the game?
Posted by Broketec
Dumpster Fire
Member since Sep 2006
1226 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

What do you make of this thought process?


No matter how right on he may be, Coward would have forumlated his response, to whatever punishments were handed down, to be in the most agreeable fashion with the end result.

Had Goodell ordered Vilma to be stoned in public, Coward would have found a way to say Tony Romo's name 3 times, give one shout out to Eli Manning, jacked off one donkey off camera and found a way to justify Vilma's execution.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56903 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:54 pm to
There were no actions...even with multiple seasons of opportunity.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 3:59 pm to
you can't get arrested for talking about injuring another person.

NFL QBs are not the president


i can tell someone "Im gonna break that a-hole Bryans kneecaps!". that is not breaking the law


once again, Cowherd makes a stupid analogy
This post was edited on 5/2/12 at 4:03 pm
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 7:18 pm to
If your kid is throwing rocks at your head, are you going to wait for him to actually hit you before doing something?
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 7:19 pm to
of course its for the plot.

these nfl games are professionally officiated and even reviewed after every single game.. players are punished on the spot if their on the field actions are deemed illegal.
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
60634 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 9:50 pm to
I think what that says is that if it was a plot conjured up and designed by the coaches and not a scheme designed by players (which is what we are told)...then there is essentially no defense for a player

If the players didnt make the plot, and the players didnt participate in the plot and they can still get punished...then they have no defense

Under cowherd's theory...every player should be suspended because the plot was organizational and not something done player to player

It is obvious the player suspensions are based on some type of physical evidence in participation and not just plotting from the sidelines, whether that be through hits or payments...the organization itself was punished for the plot
Posted by DanglingFury
Living the dream
Member since Dec 2007
20450 posts
Posted on 5/2/12 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

The punishment is for the plot, not actually carrying out the plot.


Nice to see the Commissioner subscribes to the Minority Report method of crime and punishment.

Is rewarding someone for "what they're trying to do anyway" the same as "manslaughter?" Cuz Goodell must feel that way, the punishments are the same.
Posted by geauxtigahs87
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
26270 posts
Posted on 5/3/12 at 12:56 am to
quote:

Cowherd says

stopped reading there
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram