- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cowherd says the punishment is for the plot, not the actions.....
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:26 pm
"You can get arrested for plotting to kill the President, even without killing the president." He said Saints fans who are saying there is no proof of injured players are off-base and delusional. The punishment is for the plot, not actually carrying out the plot.
What do you make of this thought process?
What do you make of this thought process?
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:31 pm to The Mick
quote:
What do you make of this thought process?
I stopped thinking about his thought processes a long time ago.
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:33 pm to The Mick
quote:Thats not what the NFL says.
The punishment is for the plot, not actually carrying out the plot.
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:39 pm to The Mick
I mean, it's an analogy. But I wouldn't say it's a good analogy.
Plotting to kill our nation's leader =/= rewards for hard hits
Plotting to kill our nation's leader =/= rewards for hard hits
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:43 pm to The Mick
quote:
"You can get arrested for plotting to kill the President, even without killing the president." He said Saints fans who are saying there is no proof of injured players are off-base and delusional. The punishment is for the plot, not actually carrying out the plot.
What do you make of this thought process?
Bad analogy. There is a big difference between "I'm going to kill that em effer" on the football field than there is "I'm going to kill that em effer" IRL. Context is everything.
The Saints were spewing football rhetoric. If the rhetoric resulted into breaking game rules then the words spoken were not rhetoric. Otherwise the words were for motivational effect only.
Did the Saints words lead to breaking the rules of the game?
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:43 pm to The Mick
quote:
What do you make of this thought process?
No matter how right on he may be, Coward would have forumlated his response, to whatever punishments were handed down, to be in the most agreeable fashion with the end result.
Had Goodell ordered Vilma to be stoned in public, Coward would have found a way to say Tony Romo's name 3 times, give one shout out to Eli Manning, jacked off one donkey off camera and found a way to justify Vilma's execution.
Posted on 5/2/12 at 2:54 pm to The Mick
There were no actions...even with multiple seasons of opportunity.
Posted on 5/2/12 at 3:59 pm to The Mick
you can't get arrested for talking about injuring another person.
NFL QBs are not the president
i can tell someone "Im gonna break that a-hole Bryans kneecaps!". that is not breaking the law
once again, Cowherd makes a stupid analogy
NFL QBs are not the president
i can tell someone "Im gonna break that a-hole Bryans kneecaps!". that is not breaking the law
once again, Cowherd makes a stupid analogy
This post was edited on 5/2/12 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 5/2/12 at 7:18 pm to The Mick
If your kid is throwing rocks at your head, are you going to wait for him to actually hit you before doing something?
Posted on 5/2/12 at 7:19 pm to The Mick
of course its for the plot.
these nfl games are professionally officiated and even reviewed after every single game.. players are punished on the spot if their on the field actions are deemed illegal.
these nfl games are professionally officiated and even reviewed after every single game.. players are punished on the spot if their on the field actions are deemed illegal.
Posted on 5/2/12 at 9:50 pm to The Mick
I think what that says is that if it was a plot conjured up and designed by the coaches and not a scheme designed by players (which is what we are told)...then there is essentially no defense for a player
If the players didnt make the plot, and the players didnt participate in the plot and they can still get punished...then they have no defense
Under cowherd's theory...every player should be suspended because the plot was organizational and not something done player to player
It is obvious the player suspensions are based on some type of physical evidence in participation and not just plotting from the sidelines, whether that be through hits or payments...the organization itself was punished for the plot
If the players didnt make the plot, and the players didnt participate in the plot and they can still get punished...then they have no defense
Under cowherd's theory...every player should be suspended because the plot was organizational and not something done player to player
It is obvious the player suspensions are based on some type of physical evidence in participation and not just plotting from the sidelines, whether that be through hits or payments...the organization itself was punished for the plot
Posted on 5/2/12 at 10:31 pm to The Mick
quote:
The punishment is for the plot, not actually carrying out the plot.
Nice to see the Commissioner subscribes to the Minority Report method of crime and punishment.
Is rewarding someone for "what they're trying to do anyway" the same as "manslaughter?" Cuz Goodell must feel that way, the punishments are the same.
Posted on 5/3/12 at 12:56 am to The Mick
quote:
Cowherd says
stopped reading there
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News