Started By
Message
locked post

Why Vegas Likes Bama in NOLA

Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:54 am
Posted by skeetandtrap
Houston
Member since Nov 2011
105 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:54 am
Posted by Champs
Geaux Tigers
Member since Feb 2008
11715 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:55 am to
Posted by touchdown moses
eunice, LA
Member since Nov 2009
6024 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:56 am to
frick em, frick em all
Posted by purpleleaf
Member since Aug 2011
4004 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:58 am to
Tigers are out to break Vegas.
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
50194 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:58 am to
I'd say that oddsmaker, based on the article's sampling of his logic, needs to prepare for a career change.
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
28665 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:01 am to
That oddsmaker is ate up with stupid
Posted by TigerattheU
Member since Aug 2006
3481 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:01 am to
quote:

“I have a hard time saying that LSU won that game,” Patterson said, despite the minor point of reality contradicting him.

Posted by bluestem75
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2007
3251 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:02 am to
This guy's entire analysis is based on a falsehood: more yards = better performace. Look at the Sugar Bowl: Michigan won by capitalizing on VT's mistakes and by NOT allowing VT to score touchdowns in the red zone in the 1st half. Defense and special teams are part of the game, too.

Bama may have the better offense, but LSU's defense had a second gear that Bama's seemed to lack especially as the game wore on.

One thing his analysis fails to consider is the ability of the LSU's defense and special teams to create a shorter field for the LSU offense, thus REDUCING the number of yards LSU's offense needs to go to score. If you add back the blocked punt return and Mo's interception return yardage into our offensive production in the first game, the yardage statistics are virtually even.
This post was edited on 1/7/12 at 9:04 am
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:05 am to
quote:

“I have a hard time saying that LSU won that game,” Patterson said, despite the minor point of reality contradicting him. “I would argue that they did lose the game statistically against Alabama when they played in November. I’m a Michigan alum and it’s real easy for me to say Virginia Tech beat Michigan in the Sugar Bowl.”

The Hokies didn’t, actually. The Wolverines won 23-20 on a field goal in overtime, despite being outgained by Virginia Tech (377 yards to 184) and eking out 12 first downs to the Hokies’ 22. But Patterson’s point is the same: In both games, the better team lost.


Denial is strong with this one.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22045 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:05 am to
Interesting picture of the one-legged Bama player holding his junk...
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
19014 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:09 am to
Bama got a new kicker?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99127 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Second, Patterson says, Alabama’s Nick Saban is a better coach than LSU’s Les Miles (even though Miles is 3-2 against Saban). Third, in the parallel universe of Vegas oddsmaking, Alabama actually won its game against the Tigers. You see, oddsmakers keep meticulous ratings of each team, and Alabama has led Patterson’s all year.

I have a hard time saying that LSU won that game,” Patterson said, despite the minor point of reality contradicting him. “I would argue that they did lose the game statistically against Alabama when they played in November. I’m a Michigan alum and it’s real easy for me to say Virginia Tech beat Michigan in the Sugar Bowl.”


Are we SURE this guy is not a Bama alum?
Posted by 007mag
Death Valley, Sec. 408
Member since Dec 2011
3873 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:13 am to
in the parallel universe of Vegas oddsmaking, Alabama actually won its game against the Tigers.
I'd like to have seen him explaining that to Boudreaux when he came to collect his winnings
Posted by White Tiger
Dallas
Member since Jul 2007
12830 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:17 am to
His explanation makes no sense to me at all.
Posted by Francis Marion
Le Bossier
Member since Jul 2011
1536 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:20 am to
.
quote:

Third, in the parallel universe of Vegas oddsmaking, Alabama actually won its game against the Tigers.


quote:

I'd like to have seen him explaining that to Boudreaux when he came to collect his winnings


I'm sorry Boudreaux but even though LSU had more points than Alabama they still lost, it's called the eye test!
This post was edited on 1/7/12 at 9:23 am
Posted by rileytiger
In Hamster Cage Running on Wheel
Member since Feb 2007
2031 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:32 am to
What's funny is that if Ford did not step out of bounds. He would have scored a touchdown. Plus LSU dominated the last 5 minutes of regulation on both sides of the ball into overtime.

Good I hope the team sees this shite amongst all the bamatard, " We beat ourselves!".

Posted by MiaTigah
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2009
447 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 10:13 am to
If it makes a difference to you... they also picked them to win on 11/5!

Posted by catnip
Member since Sep 2003
16342 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 10:23 am to
Lets send him a note asking him for the odds of any NC team in the last 60 years to have out gained all the teams they played in that season.
This post was edited on 1/7/12 at 10:24 am
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 10:24 am to
quote:

“I have a hard time saying that LSU won that game,” Patterson said, despite the minor point of reality contradicting him. “I would argue that they did lose the game statistically against Alabama when they played in November. I’m a Michigan alum and it’s real easy for me to say Virginia Tech beat Michigan in the Sugar Bowl.”
Posted by Geaux2002
Member since Jun 2011
3561 posts
Posted on 1/7/12 at 12:11 pm to
Tons of money has been put on LSU and Vegas is going to do whatever it can to try and balance the money, even if it is ridiculous logic like their ratings of Bama. It is amazing how highly they regard Bama when LSU beat every good team Bama did and even better teams.

That said, I really don't give a shite what Vegas says, this game isn't going to be won on the field. If Saban is such a better coach than Miles and Bama is the better team clearly, then how exactly did they lose AT HOME? Ah, the bullshite these guys spew.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram