- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why Vegas Likes Bama in NOLA
Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:54 am
Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:54 am
Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:58 am to skeetandtrap
Tigers are out to break Vegas.
Posted on 1/7/12 at 8:58 am to skeetandtrap
I'd say that oddsmaker, based on the article's sampling of his logic, needs to prepare for a career change.
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:01 am to skeetandtrap
That oddsmaker is ate up with stupid
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:01 am to skeetandtrap
quote:
“I have a hard time saying that LSU won that game,” Patterson said, despite the minor point of reality contradicting him.
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:02 am to skeetandtrap
This guy's entire analysis is based on a falsehood: more yards = better performace. Look at the Sugar Bowl: Michigan won by capitalizing on VT's mistakes and by NOT allowing VT to score touchdowns in the red zone in the 1st half. Defense and special teams are part of the game, too.
Bama may have the better offense, but LSU's defense had a second gear that Bama's seemed to lack especially as the game wore on.
One thing his analysis fails to consider is the ability of the LSU's defense and special teams to create a shorter field for the LSU offense, thus REDUCING the number of yards LSU's offense needs to go to score. If you add back the blocked punt return and Mo's interception return yardage into our offensive production in the first game, the yardage statistics are virtually even.
Bama may have the better offense, but LSU's defense had a second gear that Bama's seemed to lack especially as the game wore on.
One thing his analysis fails to consider is the ability of the LSU's defense and special teams to create a shorter field for the LSU offense, thus REDUCING the number of yards LSU's offense needs to go to score. If you add back the blocked punt return and Mo's interception return yardage into our offensive production in the first game, the yardage statistics are virtually even.
This post was edited on 1/7/12 at 9:04 am
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:05 am to skeetandtrap
quote:
“I have a hard time saying that LSU won that game,” Patterson said, despite the minor point of reality contradicting him. “I would argue that they did lose the game statistically against Alabama when they played in November. I’m a Michigan alum and it’s real easy for me to say Virginia Tech beat Michigan in the Sugar Bowl.”
The Hokies didn’t, actually. The Wolverines won 23-20 on a field goal in overtime, despite being outgained by Virginia Tech (377 yards to 184) and eking out 12 first downs to the Hokies’ 22. But Patterson’s point is the same: In both games, the better team lost.
Denial is strong with this one.
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:05 am to skeetandtrap
Interesting picture of the one-legged Bama player holding his junk...
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:12 am to skeetandtrap
quote:
Second, Patterson says, Alabama’s Nick Saban is a better coach than LSU’s Les Miles (even though Miles is 3-2 against Saban). Third, in the parallel universe of Vegas oddsmaking, Alabama actually won its game against the Tigers. You see, oddsmakers keep meticulous ratings of each team, and Alabama has led Patterson’s all year.
“I have a hard time saying that LSU won that game,” Patterson said, despite the minor point of reality contradicting him. “I would argue that they did lose the game statistically against Alabama when they played in November. I’m a Michigan alum and it’s real easy for me to say Virginia Tech beat Michigan in the Sugar Bowl.”
Are we SURE this guy is not a Bama alum?
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:13 am to skeetandtrap
in the parallel universe of Vegas oddsmaking, Alabama actually won its game against the Tigers.
I'd like to have seen him explaining that to Boudreaux when he came to collect his winnings
I'd like to have seen him explaining that to Boudreaux when he came to collect his winnings
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:17 am to skeetandtrap
His explanation makes no sense to me at all.
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:20 am to skeetandtrap
.
I'm sorry Boudreaux but even though LSU had more points than Alabama they still lost, it's called the eye test!
quote:
Third, in the parallel universe of Vegas oddsmaking, Alabama actually won its game against the Tigers.
quote:
I'd like to have seen him explaining that to Boudreaux when he came to collect his winnings
I'm sorry Boudreaux but even though LSU had more points than Alabama they still lost, it's called the eye test!
This post was edited on 1/7/12 at 9:23 am
Posted on 1/7/12 at 9:32 am to skeetandtrap
What's funny is that if Ford did not step out of bounds. He would have scored a touchdown. Plus LSU dominated the last 5 minutes of regulation on both sides of the ball into overtime.
Good I hope the team sees this shite amongst all the bamatard, " We beat ourselves!".
Good I hope the team sees this shite amongst all the bamatard, " We beat ourselves!".
Posted on 1/7/12 at 10:13 am to skeetandtrap
If it makes a difference to you... they also picked them to win on 11/5!
Posted on 1/7/12 at 10:23 am to skeetandtrap
Lets send him a note asking him for the odds of any NC team in the last 60 years to have out gained all the teams they played in that season.
This post was edited on 1/7/12 at 10:24 am
Posted on 1/7/12 at 10:24 am to skeetandtrap
quote:
“I have a hard time saying that LSU won that game,” Patterson said, despite the minor point of reality contradicting him. “I would argue that they did lose the game statistically against Alabama when they played in November. I’m a Michigan alum and it’s real easy for me to say Virginia Tech beat Michigan in the Sugar Bowl.”
Posted on 1/7/12 at 12:11 pm to skeetandtrap
Tons of money has been put on LSU and Vegas is going to do whatever it can to try and balance the money, even if it is ridiculous logic like their ratings of Bama. It is amazing how highly they regard Bama when LSU beat every good team Bama did and even better teams.
That said, I really don't give a shite what Vegas says, this game isn't going to be won on the field. If Saban is such a better coach than Miles and Bama is the better team clearly, then how exactly did they lose AT HOME? Ah, the bullshite these guys spew.
That said, I really don't give a shite what Vegas says, this game isn't going to be won on the field. If Saban is such a better coach than Miles and Bama is the better team clearly, then how exactly did they lose AT HOME? Ah, the bullshite these guys spew.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News