- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Umm...why has no one mentioned the field goal yet?
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:08 pm
It was definitely good. Would have made it 27-24 = No overtime.
12
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:08 pm to bigbenlsu
quote:
It was definitely good.
No, it wasn't.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:08 pm to bigbenlsu
Looking at where the camera was, I think it was good.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:08 pm to bigbenlsu
Was not definitely anything.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:09 pm to bigbenlsu
it was good
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:10 pm to UnluckyTiger
looked good to me
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:10 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
I thought it looked good, but...
quote:
Was not definitely anything.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:10 pm to UnluckyTiger
The camera angle was bad. They have two refs looking directly up at the field goal posts. It was an obvious miss.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:10 pm to UnluckyTiger
If it goes over the top is it not good?
And the angle they were showing was off, so it was even more inside the upright than it actually appeared.
And the angle they were showing was off, so it was even more inside the upright than it actually appeared.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:10 pm to bigbenlsu
Def good? No way? If the ball is higher than the top of the upright it must be 'clearly' inside the upright! Looked like it went right over the top of upright?
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:10 pm to JJ27
It's called home cooking. The refs were probably too dumb to realize they just cost their conf an opportunity to play for a crystal ball
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:10 pm to bigbenlsu
The ball has to go to the inside of the goal post when it's above it. This ball went directly over the goal post, so no good.
Nothing you could do now anyway.
Nothing you could do now anyway.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:11 pm to bigbenlsu
Looked to me like it went directly over the upright. Pretty sure it has to cross inside the upright. And, it was definitely anything, as was said above.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:11 pm to bigbenlsu
They never showed a good angle.
The look at the goal posts from underneath, at a slight angle has to be the worst way to "judge" whether it went through or not.
The look at the goal posts from underneath, at a slight angle has to be the worst way to "judge" whether it went through or not.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:11 pm to bigbenlsu
The ball sailed over the left post, that would make it good correct?
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:12 pm to guttata
quote:
The refs were probably too dumb to realize they just cost their conf an opportunity to play for a crystal ball
Do the refs get some kind of bonus for having a team from "their conference" making the BCSNCG? Of all the stupid shite you post on this website, this might be the stupidest.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:12 pm to LooseCannon22282
Nope, must be clearly inside upright
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:12 pm to medtiger
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:13 pm to WilsonPickett
That is what I thought
Posted on 11/18/11 at 11:13 pm to bigbenlsu
The way they explained it was over the post is not good. Must clear the inside of the post completely.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News