- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lee vs. Mett - Question based on assumptions
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:41 pm
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical... why wouldn't you prefer to play the QB who has 2+ years of eligibility left versus the QB with less than one?
NOTE: I pose the question only to hear folk's opinions. Barring injury, I am sure Lee will be the QB for the rest of the year whether everyone likes it or not.
NOTE: I pose the question only to hear folk's opinions. Barring injury, I am sure Lee will be the QB for the rest of the year whether everyone likes it or not.
23
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:43 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical
a, i don't think they are.
b, i don't think they will.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:43 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical... why wouldn't you prefer to play the QB who has 2+ years of eligibility left versus the QB with less than one?
because the one who has been here for 4 years has more experience then the one who is just starting here.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:44 pm to TexasTiger82
Since we can go 10-2 just running the ball, I would play the guy coming back next year. Actually helps out for recruiting when recruits know the starting QB is returning.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:44 pm to TexasTiger82
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:44 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical..
If their execution would be identical, there would be no reason to have a debate.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:46 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
why wouldn't you prefer to play the QB who has 2+ years of eligibility left versus the QB with less than one?
So what you're saying is a senior qb should never start over a junior, and the starter should be based on how many years they have to play.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:47 pm to TexasTiger82
How many more ways can we word this Lee vs. Mett debate? NOTE: I pose the question only to hear folk's opinions.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:47 pm to TexasTiger82
Lee has more game experience, has been through a gauntlet during his time at LSU and stuck it all out like a champ! He has earned his starts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:52 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:Absurd assumption.
Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical,
quote:Equally absurd assumption.
their execution over the course of the season will be identical
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:54 pm to TexasTiger82
More comfortable with a 5th year senior than a guy who has only played a half of D1 football before. Leadership takes longer to learn than skill does. Mett will be good but I'm not ready to throw it to him yet. Not unless we have to.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:59 pm to TexasTiger82
I swear only 7 people know anything about football on this board
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:01 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
TexasTiger82
Did you not see the other 3-5 threads on QB in the first 2 pages of the rant?
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:08 pm to TexasTiger82
Yet another new thread about yet another hypothetical scenario involving LSU QBs that popped into yet another rantard's head.
Let's see how many more threads we can start today about hypothetical scenarios involving Lee and Mett.
The Rant is full of awesome today.
Let's see how many more threads we can start today about hypothetical scenarios involving Lee and Mett.
The Rant is full of awesome today.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:15 pm to TexasTiger82
great.....another qb post........please post something original
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:29 pm to TexasTiger82
Why would you do that?
Is it to gain experience?
So is experience important, or not?
Is it to gain experience?
So is experience important, or not?
Posted on 9/14/11 at 9:13 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical... why wouldn't you prefer to play the QB who has 2+ years of eligibility left versus the QB with less than one?
Are we also "assuming" that Mett has the same (or better) ability to read SEC defenses at NCAA Division I gamespeed as Lee does?
Posted on 9/14/11 at 9:14 pm to TexasTiger82
what an original post ive never seen one like this
Posted on 9/14/11 at 9:26 pm to TexasTiger82
can we please just fricking STOP. JL is our quarterback, he will be our quarterback until he is no longer our quarterback. Thats it. End of Story. We dont need 20 threads a day saying the same shite over and over.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 10:11 pm to TexasTiger82
because give Mett one more year to learn, and he only needs to play 1 year to win a NC.
Matt Flynn
Matt Flynn
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News