Started By
Message

re: Listen, Saintards, Mark Ingram is not that valuable

Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:10 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

Make up your mind.

it's an either or

1. spending 1st round picks on RB

2. spending a lot of money on RB
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
56306 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:12 pm to
We got Ingram and Jordan!
Posted by HeadCoach
Shady's Parking Lot
Member since Mar 2009
5659 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:20 pm to
HAHAHA!!!! OP is a douche bag of legendary proportion!
Posted by BamaBill
Coon's Head
Member since Oct 2008
108 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:20 pm to
SFP is the same TD.com retard that was all over Jamarcus Russell saying he would be a good NFL QB.

Who Dat Who Dat

Ingram will be soild in the run game for the Saints
Posted by TigerArkitek
Bestbank
Member since Oct 2005
1336 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:24 pm to
Saints coulda gotten Ridley without giving up a thing.

I hope Ingram is that good and does this mean the end of Bush as a Saint?
Posted by GeauxWarTigers
Auburn
Member since Oct 2010
18046 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

HAHAHA!!!! OP is a douche bag of legendary proportion!



I'm glad the saints got Ingram, but the OP is right. There are plenty of running back in this draft and there will be plenty of running backs in future drafts.

Guess who is on the cover of NFL '12? Peyton -fricking- Hillis. He had 1100 yards last year and he probably wasn't taken anywhere near the 1st round. Pierre Thomas did it for the Saints in '09 and Chris Ivory did pretty well last year when he got playing time. Neither of them were 1st round picks.

The Saints lost to a 7-9 team in the playoffs because their D got torn to shreds. Taking a defensive player in the draft ahead of a RB was a smart move. I'm glad the Saints got Ingram and I think he will do very well and help balance the offense so Brees doesn't have to do so much. I'm not sure he was worth the trades they had to pull to get him though. Time will tell.
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

RB has almost no value in the NFL right now


You don't know shite.

The Saints had DeShawn effing Wynn in there with Julius Jones at the end of it this year.

Year before? They had two decent tailbacks for 1st & 2nd down, and won a SuperBowl.

Teams have to have MULTIPLE tailbacks and they don't last as long. You have to CONSTANTLY prospect for 'em.

The tailback situation was the key to the Saints getting blitzed 49 times in Atlanta. We simply couldn't run the ball. We won, but Brees got his arse lit up continually.

Without tailbacks, you see Brees' eyes go into Silver Dollar mode all night.

Get a clue. Oh, I know, you're some popular poster here. WGAF. Weak take, brochacho.
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

The Saints lost to a 7-9 team in the playoffs because our offense couldn't run the ball in the 2nd half and play clock to shrink the back end of the game, which was our ENTIRE offensive gameplan in 2009 when we won it all.


FIFY

We jumped all over people's asses with fast starts, and then ran you to DEATH, especially in the 2nd half, and picked favorable mismatches on offense based on situations in the 2nd half.

Not having a running game had everything lean on Brees.
This post was edited on 4/28/11 at 10:43 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

The Saints had DeShawn effing Wynn in there with Julius Jones at the end of it this year.

because they made bad choices and had bad luck in 2010 doesn't mean RB has little value in teh NFL

if we had signed thomas jones, we'd have been fine

quote:

Teams have to have MULTIPLE tailbacks and they don't last as long.

which is exactly why you don't invest a lot in any 1 RB

Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

which is exactly why you don't invest a lot in any 1 RB


24th pick in 2010 - Dez Bryant, WR, OSU.

5 years, 11.8 million dollars

24th pick in 2009 - Peria Jerry, DL, Ole Myth.

5 years, 10.35 million dollars

Pierre Thomas - RB, Saints

4 years, 12 million

So, the previous 2 24th picks in the draft signed for THIRTY THREE PERCENT LESS than Thomas makes right now, but we're investing too fricking much?

Get a fricking clue. Dipshit.
Posted by GeauxWarTigers
Auburn
Member since Oct 2010
18046 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

The Saints lost to a 7-9 team in the playoffs because our offense couldn't run the ball in the 2nd half and play clock to shrink the back end of the game, which was our ENTIRE offensive gameplan in 2009 when we won it all.



Tell that to the 51 yards rushing the Saints had in the Superbowl.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120412 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:52 pm to
Slow, did you really say jamarcus would be a great QB?
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Tell that to the 51 yards rushing the Saints had in the Superbowl.


we also had 93 yards and a TD out of the backfield. It also takes the pass rush off of us
Posted by LSU9102
West of the Mississippi
Member since Mar 2007
2476 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

which is exactly why you don't invest a lot in any 1 RB


Tiki Barber at 36 is cheap.
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Tell that to the 51 yards rushing the Saints had in the Superbowl.


So, tell me more about how the Saints played from ahead in the 2nd half of the Super Bowl?

Oh, wait...You mean we had to throw our way back in it? You mean, we had to throw our modus operandi out of the window in order to come back and not only tie, but take the lead?

Thanks for playing the, "I didn't really think this through, but I'm way too attached to my opinion and my own interest in it to admit I don't know what I'm talking about." We've got some nice parting gifts for you.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56690 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

almost nothing separates a guy like ingram from a guy like ridley


Noted for future reference.
Posted by Alan Garner
thigh-land
Member since Oct 2009
3433 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

almost nothing separates a guy like ingram from a guy like ridley


lolwut
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43305 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:57 pm to
I like the Ingram pick. IDGAF what anyone else thinks about it, I like what the Saints did in round 1. We got great value for great guys, period.

I'm not going to claim he's taking us to the superbowl, but he's going to be a stud and we got him at a great value. The only thing I can't figure out is who is going to be our RB lineup. PT, Ingram has to be those two. Is SP planning a 4 rb active roster? I can't see Reggie being cut unless he will not accept low enough pay, then I guess it'd be PT, Ingram, and Ivory.. but none of them have great breakaway speed.

Ivory - 4.47
PT - 4.65
Ingram - 4.58

The fastest is Ivory and he's proven that he can break away but he's not a burner. Who would be our 3DRB? Ivory can't catch, not him. Would PT or Ingram be our primary back? PT is proven but fragile, Ingram is unproven but has great promise..

Gaah I DON'T KNOW!
This post was edited on 4/28/11 at 11:04 pm
Posted by BigD45
Chambers County, TX
Member since Feb 2007
1153 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

24th pick in 2010 - Dez Bryant, WR, OSU.

5 years, 11.8 million dollars

24th pick in 2009 - Peria Jerry, DL, Ole Myth.

5 years, 10.35 million dollars

Pierre Thomas - RB, Saints

4 years, 12 million

So, the previous 2 24th picks in the draft signed for THIRTY THREE PERCENT LESS than Thomas makes right now, but we're investing too fricking much?

Get a fricking clue. Dipshit.



I second that!


Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

Slow, did you really say jamarcus would be a great QB?

he was one of the best QB prospects ever. great college career, smart, accurate QB with top 5 all time physical tools

but, he's a lazy frick
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram