- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For the technical folks..
Posted on 7/14/10 at 8:11 am to ccw
Posted on 7/14/10 at 8:11 am to ccw
let me also add that if the well is actually flowing up the 7" x 9 7/8" casing string, then shutting the well in at the capping stack should work just fine. that casing string is designed to handle high, producing type pressures.
i know it's been reported / assumed for some time that the well is flowing up the annulus behind the 7" x 9 7/8" string; however, to my knowledge that has not been conclusively proven as of yet.
i know it's been reported / assumed for some time that the well is flowing up the annulus behind the 7" x 9 7/8" string; however, to my knowledge that has not been conclusively proven as of yet.
Posted on 7/14/10 at 8:23 am to oilfieldtiger
I guess that's the point though. Nobody really knows. BP seems to think there are two possibilities: Flow up the annulus and then entering the casing at the seal assembly or down the annulus and up through the float collar. I'm disappointed and frustrated that the test wasn't run but it's hard to argue against being careful.
LINK [pdf]
LINK [pdf]
This post was edited on 7/14/10 at 8:24 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News