- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:36 pm to jonboy
quote:
That's rich. He "grasps" the ball. No he catches the ball. Grasps the ball. Now i think i've heard it all.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:36 pm to LSU0945
quote:
look fellas WE GOT frickED nothing we can do . we needed stop bitching and beat them in our place next year
I'll drink to that.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:39 pm to arrakis
quote:
Please post a clear and in focus picture that shows his foot is not on the line. Thanks
What are you talking about? Are you an SEC official are something because they are the only ones that can't see that is a 2 foot NFL int.
I don't have enough faith in J Lee to think he could have moved the ball down the feild for the win, but clearly that is an int. Ray Charles can see that.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:41 pm to TigerJeux
StatMaster,
Your answer is what I presumed the rules to be - the reason I asked is because Danielson kept referring to the "right foot" when clearly the ball hit Peterson's hands 2 steps back (right and left foot down), then he proceeded to drag the left foot while tucking the ball, and then appeared to take another step with his right foot along the boundary line, which also appeared to be inbounds.
When I'm uncertain of something, I ask questions that "may be pertinent" to the reason for an argument. If you are correct on the "possession" issue, then it was clearly an INT, which is what I also thought.
Your answer is what I presumed the rules to be - the reason I asked is because Danielson kept referring to the "right foot" when clearly the ball hit Peterson's hands 2 steps back (right and left foot down), then he proceeded to drag the left foot while tucking the ball, and then appeared to take another step with his right foot along the boundary line, which also appeared to be inbounds.
When I'm uncertain of something, I ask questions that "may be pertinent" to the reason for an argument. If you are correct on the "possession" issue, then it was clearly an INT, which is what I also thought.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:43 pm to JPLSU1981
Matt Zemek of collegefootballnews.com seems to agree that there were errors after looking at this thread.
quote:
RE: Pete/Matt ... Please check out these LSU-Bama photos..‏
From: Matthew Zemek
Sent: Sun 11/08/09 11:34 PM
The errors are clear and overwhelming. I spent my whole feature column last Thursday explaining why Big Ten replay-booth failures were so important and worthy of further examination.
thanks!
Matt
quote:
From:
To: pete@collegefootballnews.com; mzemek@hotmail.com
Subject: Pete/Matt ... Please check out these LSU-Bama photos..
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:32:07 -0600
displaying some of the officiating errors in the LSU-Alabama game. Please let us know your thoughts on them...
LINK
Thanks,
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 11:46 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:46 pm to TigerStuckinOkieland
Peterson clearly "caught" the ball the moment it touched his hands. It did not shift, it was not bobbled, it DID NOT MOVE. All that was done after that moment was Peterson tucking it to his side. So what some of these tards would have you believe is that if Peterson had just held the ball and not tucked it, THEN it would've been a catch. So, by tucking it, he made the catch an incompletion. What a bunch of BS. It was and INT. We probably lose anyway, but it would've been nice if Bama had actually had to stop us to secure the victory.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:48 pm to JPLSU1981
Strong work JP.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:51 pm to StatMaster
the ironic thing about all this is the replay official was looking at the EXACT SAME views that we are all looking at.
As Matt Zemek said, the "errors are clear and overwhelming."
We may very well have not driven the ball and won the game, but we were robbed of the opportunity at the very least.
As Matt Zemek said, the "errors are clear and overwhelming."
We may very well have not driven the ball and won the game, but we were robbed of the opportunity at the very least.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 11:52 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:56 pm to arrakis
quote:
Please post a clear and in focus picture that shows his foot is not on the line. Thanks
Case closed. Even if we assume the left foot came up before the catch (which is not true), the right foot WASN'T EVEN CLOSE to being out of bounds.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:58 pm to JPLSU1981
And the question that won't go away anytime soon is why in the face of incontrovertible evidence were we robbed?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:59 pm to StatMaster
quote:
P.S. If this isn't true, the Arizona Cardinals got robbed out of Superbowl win last year.
Plus, the NFL rules for a catch are a little tougher than the NCAA's rules.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 12:00 am to BamaScoop
quote:No sir. The marker is just behind the official on the 50 - right where the ball is on the field!
Y'all are looking at where the center is holding the ball after he has positioned it in his hand
Posted on 11/9/09 at 12:02 am to arrakis
quote:
For all you LSU FanTards, that doesn't equal a catch. At 41 he's demonstrating possession and control, but by then his left foot is long since off the ground. Now he has to get his right foot inbounds to complete the requirements for a catch
You are reaching now. Flame on bruh. Flame on.Posted on 11/9/09 at 12:07 am to jlc05
quote:
incontrovertible evidence
You need a lawyer to decipher that phrase. Is there a checklist or something the booth official uses?
Posted on 11/9/09 at 12:08 am to jonboy
quote:
Is there a checklist or something the booth official uses?
Yes, but the Bama replay official needs glasses to read it and he forgot them Saturday night so he said "frick it".
ETA: Didn't CBS say that the replay wasn't working at the beginning of the game? Wouldn't it be hilarious if somehow it came out that there was no replay available for this play and they just went with the original call? Kiffin may not be all that crazy after all.
This post was edited on 11/9/09 at 12:10 am
Posted on 11/9/09 at 12:10 am to JPLSU1981
If we win the next three games, that will be 2 times in 4 years that we will have lost out on an opportunity to play in the National Title game because of official's errors while playing a game in the state of Alabama.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 12:12 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:
Didn't CBS say that the replay wasn't working at the beginning of the game?
That's right. Someone posted earlier that the bama coaching staff had headset issues against UT the week before.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 12:14 am to jonboy
quote:
Someone posted earlier that the bama coaching staff had headset issues against UT the week before.
Correction:
quote:
Someone posted earlier that the Tenn coaching staff had headset issues against Bama the week before.
Kiffin was bitching about it and how convenient it was that it happened at a critical time for Tenn.
Page 7 of 22
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News