Started By
Message

re: On this date in 1954, the USSR, aka, the Soviet Union, officially submitted a request…

Posted on 3/31/24 at 8:31 pm to
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36232 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

Serious question. Is it reasonable for Russia to want a buffer between itself and NATO countries?


They use to have a buffer. Poland, East Germany, Hungary and the other Eastern Bloc nations formed a buffer. It was commonly known as the Iron Curtain.

Russia conquered all these countries and NATO was formed to stop further eastward aggression by Russia. When these nations finally freed themselves from Russian dominance and guess what? Over time they all asked to be in NATO. There is safety in numbers.

When Russia asked to get into NATO they had already helped kill thousands of Americans in Korea. Instead of joining the United Nations, they joined their Communist brothers. Why would we ever excrpt them into NATO. They proved to be ruthless and a danger to democracies across Europe and the world.

NATO is not an offensive threat to Russia, but if does serve as a threat to Russia recreating their empire. Ukraine moving towards the West wasn’t acceptable to Russia; who wanted Crimea, Kiev and Odessa back. They saw a weakness in Obama and then Biden.

If there was no NATO Russia would have invented some other reason to ruthlessly take Ukraine.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126968 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

It’s the same empire that Volodya Putin is now attempting to re-establish.


We’ve been hearing this for 20 plus years now. Where is the evidence of this? And before you say Ukraine hur durrr,
Russia has occupied and/or has annexed part of the Republic of Georgia, a significant part of eastern Ukraine in 2014 and more in 2022 and a significant part of eastern Moldova.

In 2005 Putin called the collapse of the Soviet empire “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century.”

His actions since then tell me he’s not just complaining about it. He plans to do something about it.
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
5960 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

This is about subjugation of Ukraine. NATO is the strawman


OP claims Putin's Russia going to remake USSR and her territories through force.

Many of us don't think it is possible if the Russian losses are what is being reported.


Posted by HughsWorkPhone
Member since Sep 2017
1151 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

By attacking a peaceful neighbor and killing tens of thousands of their civilians in the process to achieve that "buffer"?


There was a buffer before we changed that with our Ukrainian coup.

We were about to bring that “peaceful neighbor” into an alliance that’s entire purpose is anti Russia.

I’m sure you’d be perfectly fine with Russian weapons and bases in Mexico though. Remember the Cuban missile crisis?
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53779 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

There was a buffer before we changed that with our Ukrainian coup.


There have many additions to Nato towards Russian Borders since 1997
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6860 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 8:57 pm to
Must we once again list the numerous American provocations that has resulted in the current situation in Ukraine? You people cannot face reality; we are the bad guys here.
Posted by stuckintexas
austin
Member since Sep 2009
2226 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

You morons sound exactly the same as the people who screamed to high heaven that we should invade the ME.

EXACTLY the same.

Clearly, you must be right this time.


I was an 18 YO FF in NY and volunteered to respond to Manhattan. Lost brothers, friends and neighbors that day. I wanted revenge, and for the US to do everything possible to keep that from ever happening on US soil again. frick Ukraine and giving them handouts only to line certain peoples pockets.

I'm older and don't see things the same way now. Maybe you were too young at the time, but there was a very real feeling that everyone in the country felt personally attacked after 9/11. Same way my grandfather felt after Pearl Harbor.

To equate supporting Ukraine with supporting going into the ME after 9/11 at the time sounds kinda ignorant to me.

I do agree that supporting Ukraine now, especially on the scale the US has pumped money into it, is a colossal waste.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126968 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

There was a buffer before we changed that with our Ukrainian coup.
More Russian propaganda bullshite. That “coup” was a popular uprising by Ukrainians who opposed Russian involvement in rigging the election process which determined that a pro-Russian President was elected.

I was working in Kiev when that was going on.

I witnessed firsthand the Ukrainian people refusing to allow Russia to steal their Presidential election.

quote:

The Orange Revolution (Ukrainian: ??????????? ?????????, romanized: Pomarancheva revoliutsiia) was a series of protests, that lead to political upheaval in Ukraine from late November 2004 to January 2005. It gained momentum primarily due to the initiative of the general population,[7] sparked by the aftermath of the 2004 Ukrainian presidential election run-off which was claimed to be marred by massive corruption, voter intimidation and electoral fraud.[8] Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, was the focal point of the movement's campaign of civil resistance, with thousands of protesters demonstrating daily.[9] Nationwide,[10] this was highlighted by a series of acts of civil disobedience, sit-ins, and general strikes organized by the opposition movement.
The protests were prompted by reports from several domestic and foreign election monitors as well as the widespread public perception that the results of the run-off vote of 21 November 2004 between leading candidates Viktor Yushchenko and Viktor Yanukovych were rigged by the authorities in favour of the latter.[11] The nationwide protests succeeded when the results of the original run-off were annulled, and a revote was ordered by Ukraine's Supreme Court for 26 December 2004. Under intense scrutiny by domestic and international observers, the second run-off was declared to be "free and fair". The final results showed a clear victory for Yushchenko, who received about 52% of the vote, compared to Yanukovych's 44%. Yushchenko was declared the official winner and with his inauguration on 23 January 2005 in Kyiv, the Orange Revolution ended. In the following years, the Orange Revolution had a negative connotation among pro-government circles in Belarus and Russia.
.

LINK

Only Putin syncophants believe it was a “coup.”
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72207 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

You people cannot face reality; we are the bad guys here.
So is Russia.

There are no good guys here.

The entire situation is FUBAR.
Posted by Jason9782003
Member since Aug 2007
3557 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:07 pm to
We should have listened to Patton at the end of WWII and drove the Soviets out of eastern Europe.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72207 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

To equate supporting Ukraine with supporting going into the ME after 9/11 at the time sounds kinda ignorant to me.
The only “equating” I am doing is pointing out that we were lied to then, but the US politicians are being completely honest now.

Yea, ok.

How many times must we be lied to before you all stop supporting this nonsense?

I’m not even bringing in the other “conflicts” we were dragged into over the decades.
This post was edited on 3/31/24 at 9:10 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126968 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

OP claims Putin's Russia going to remake USSR
I did not claim that.

I said Putin is attempting to reestablish the USSR.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

You morons sound exactly the same as the people who screamed to high heaven that we should invade the ME.

You should have listened to me, I was against those interventions.

When I spoke out against the first Gulf War, I was told I was unpatriotic (at best) and not supporting the troops.

I was also against Bush I's operation in Panama, cynically referred to as "Just 'Cuz".

I was also against Ronald Reagan putting marines in Lebanon in 1982.

Seems like maybe you've been listening to the wrong people. Let me guess, they also told you they were the party of "fiscal responsibility"?
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
12256 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:32 pm to
We are getting invaded on our southern border. When are we going to get a buffer state?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36232 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

There have many additions to Nato towards Russian Borders since 1997


And how many times has NATO attacked Russia? How many times has a NATO member attacked Russia? How many NATO countries has Russia attacked? How many countries not in NATO has Russia attacked?

It seems to me that I’d want to be in NATO, and it seems to me that Russia only would not want me in NATO because they mean to do me harm.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19112 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

looked it up on Wikipedia and, since 1992, Russia has invaded Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine.


quote:

shite, the US has invaded at least 5 in the same time period.


Afghanistan, Iraq, toppled Libya, tried to topple Egypt with the Arab Spring, Syria, Yemen. Obama also sent his advisor to Israel to try and upend the elections by backing the challenger to Benny N. Hell we practically set the entire Middle East on fire, but hey the scary Russians are trying to restart the Soviet Union.
Posted by Goonie02
Member since Dec 2019
2523 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 11:35 pm to
why is state aggression viewed as something wrong? isn't that what stronger states should be doing to consolidate power and to create buffer along its borer. Russia has a long history of being invaded by very large armies. not your typical regional militaries but multi ethnic and religious empires.

Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
6642 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 1:57 am to
quote:

The purpose of all of that was to hound Al Qaeda so they could not strike the USA again.


Great strategy we have. Arm terrorists. Have terrorists attack us. Kill terrorists. Create more terrorists. Rinse and repeat. The neocon foreign policy.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32369 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 4:36 am to
quote:

The US invaded Iraq in 2003, not 2001.

Afghanistan was 2001.
Afghanistan was the right thing to do in 2001. But, it should have been a "shock and awe" like Daddy Bush did in Desert Storm. In and out and not try to force our way of government on people who knew nothing but their own way of life.
Iraq and 2003 was W wholly making up a reason to go in to finish what the generals didn't want daddy to do in 91 and 92. Bomb a country all to hell and then rebuild it? One of the most stupid things this country ever did. There were obvious WMDs at one time because Sadaam used him on his own people. Were they there when we invaded? Probably not and W knew that. Didn't matter.
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
12256 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 10:50 am to
Better question is how much land have we kept. We stick our nose in everyone’s business but we are not conquerers.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram