re: Mainstream science mulls 'global moratorium' on COVID vaccines as cancers rise

There was someone on Tucker's podcast recently that discusses it. Let me see if I can find a link.

I think it may have been in the latest interview with Bret Weinstein

quote:

---

I’m convinced China released a relatively mild virus for 2 reasons.

1. To influence the election and get Trump out of office

2. To see how the world would respond to a global pandemic.

---

Exactly. Bio weapon against the world.

Next one will be way worse and bigger.

Tracy doesn’t appear very Smart.

Some people seem addicted to the jabs. Let ‘em be fools.

Just don’t be forcing shite like that down the public’s throat ever again. Once was one times too many.

This is so fricking stupid. Lou Pai's first impulse is to run in and shite on Trump, and of course someone quickly responds with a shot at Ron. Ron and Trump were both lied to. This is established fact. Birx, Fauci, etc. admitted it.

Can we stop this stupid shite and direct our rage at those who actually spread the lies? Or maybe the administration that was ready to force us to take this jab as a condition of employment.

quote:

---

The Florida State Surgeon General recently stated that

the Covid-19 Rna vaccine drives strange DNA contaminants into every human cell with the ability to change the Genome of every person receiving it.

---

Better late than never.

quote:

---

So spread the word ..... no more Rna vaccine especially those made by Pfizer and Moderna !

---

Amen.

***************************************

(LET'S RUN THE VIDEOTAPE REPLAY):


2020: "MUH COVID 1984 IS HERE. DAMN THOSE CHICOM WET-MARKETS!!

"SHUT DOWN EVERYTHING! WE'LL HOLD ON TILL YOU SAVE US WITH A 'SAFE & EFFECTIVE' VAXXINE!!" (Meanwhile, MEDICAL CENSORSHIP OF SCRUTINY RUNS AMOK)

2021: MEDICAL CENSORSHIP STILL RUNS AMOK. Big Pharm & PTB attack the "Dirty Dozen" (aka those who exposed Monkey Business and truth of the matter) are censored, attacked, ostracized and blacklisted.

"LABS?? WHAT LABS?? We've told you repeatedly -- this virus was born in Chy-na!"

"How dare you damn paranoid Conspiracy Theorists k00ks deny 'The Science' & Fauxi!! TRUST US!! Our rushed, untested Vaxxine from J&J, Moderna, Pfizer is our only hope to be saved from sure death (nevermind the 99.98% survival rate WITHOUT IT)"

2022: "Wait a minute. Why are young athletes dropping like flies? Why am I suffering from Covid 1984 symptoms if I already got muh-vaxx inoculation??"

2023: "What is "SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME"? And why hadn't Pfizer and Moderna warned that their Vax & Boosters are actually potential bio-weapons & self-assembling magnetic spike proteins that react with radio frequency waves?"

Fauxi: "I did not have relations with...funding gain-of-function Franken-research! I had nuttin' to do whiff nuttin'!"

2024: The whistleblower researchers and doctors and nurses who challenged the Scamdemic and Big Lies in 2020-2023 are finally vindicated. Do they now get their good name and career back?

"The jig is up. We know the truth. The 'Pandemic', The 'Vaxx' and ;The Science' was and is One Big Lie & Scam.

Who knew it from the beginning?
Who created the entire scripted charade? When did they know it?
Who is liable and when do they go to jail?
Now how do I remove this bioweapon from my body?
Will we see justice?

2025: ???

Is that a female Gary Busey?

How she still alive?

quote:

---

The Springer Nature medical journal Cureus, sibling to Nature and Scientific American, published a peer-reviewed paper by high-profile mRNA vaccine critics last month

---

Interesting work btw.

quote:

---

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign

Abstract
Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

---

Conclusions
Careful, objective evaluation of COVID-19 mRNA product safety is crucial for upholding ethical standards and evidence-informed decision-making. Our narrative review concerning the registrational trials and the EUA’s aftermath offers evidence-informed insights into how these genetic vaccines were able to enter the market. In the context of the two pivotal trials, safety was never assessed in a manner commensurate with previously established scientific standards either for vaccines or for GTPs, the more accurate classification of these products. Many key trial findings were either misreported or omitted entirely from published reports. The usual safety testing protocols and toxicology requirements were bypassed by the FDA and vaccine manufacturers, and the premature termination of both trials obviated any unbiased assessment of potential SAEs due to an insufficient timeframe for proper trial evaluation. It was only after the EUA that the serious biological consequences of rushing the trials became evident, with numerous cardiovascular, neurological, reproductive, hematological, malignant, and autoimmune SAEs identified and published in the peer-reviewed medical literature. Moreover, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines produced via Process 1 and evaluated in the trials were not the same products eventually distributed worldwide; all of the COVID-19 mRNA products released to the public were produced via Process 2 and have been shown to have varying degrees of DNA contamination. The failure of regulatory authorities to heretofore disclose process-related impurities (e.g., SV40) has further increased concerns regarding safety and quality control oversight of mRNA vaccine manufacturing processes.

Since early 2021, excess deaths, cardiac events, strokes, and other SAEs have often been wrongly ascribed to COVID-19 rather than to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations. Misattribution of SAEs to COVID-19 often may be due to the amplification of adverse effects when mRNA injections are followed by SARS-CoV-2 subvariant infection. Injuries from the mRNA products overlap with both PACS and severe acute COVID-19 illness, often obscuring the vaccines’ etiologic contributions. Multiple booster injections appear to cause immune dysfunction, thereby paradoxically contributing to heightened susceptibility to COVID-19 infections with successive doses. For the vast majority of adults under the age of 50, the perceived benefits of the mRNA boosters are profoundly outweighed by their potential disabling and life-threatening harms. Potential harms to older adults appear to be excessive as well. Given the well-documented SAEs and unacceptable harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse and enforce a global moratorium on these modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

LINK

---