Started By
Message

re: Name me one thing positive Willie Green has done as coach?

Posted on 2/5/24 at 11:05 am to
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
21232 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 11:05 am to
quote:

He's a negative asset the moment he signs a new max deal.


Pelsmageddon would be Ingram staying like this all season, cranks it up in the playoffs, we make the 2nd round and lose like 4-1, then Griff using that to justify the max for Ingram.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10476 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:08 pm to
Willie has had the Pels passed up by multiple worse teams since he got here.

OKC and Sacto already passed the Pels significantly.

Utah is improving despite a fire sale of their stars and is ok the fringe AND the Rockets are significantly better and improving from last year already.

Dude is a bad players coach that can’t seem to get out of his own way and refuses to adjust to the talent on his team and instead insists on asking them to be something they are not.

He is holding this team back, but because they go on little runs here and there to prop up their record into play-in territory, you call him a success.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71242 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

OKC and Sacto already passed the Pels significantly.



To be fair, I think that falls more on roster construction than on coaching.

Chet compliments SGA, Murray compliments Sabonis.

BI and Zion don't compliment each other in the slightest.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63658 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:23 pm to
He has gotten a lot out of a roster that has had more than its share of injuries and other difficulties in the tough Western Conference.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
21232 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

OKC and Sacto already passed the Pels significantly.


This is a prisoner of the moment take if I've ever seen one.

Sacto is 1.5 games ahead of us and hasn't won a playoff series just like us with Willie as coach. And we typically beat their asses when we play them heads up.

OKC hasn't won a playoff series or been to the playoffs as recently as we have. Right now they're a great team, let's see what they can do in the playoffs before saying they're "way ahead" of us.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 1:12 pm
Posted by msizzle08
Member since Dec 2019
650 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:42 pm to
1.took team to playoffs year 1.
2. led team to over .500 season for first time in about 5 seasons when Zion played 29 games only and BI 45.
3. on the verge of another over .500 season in b2b years. last time that was done CP3 was throwing lobs to Tyson Chandler.

But what do I know.
Posted by xScar
Member since Jun 2017
127 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:47 pm to
Consistently produces a top 10 defense with 4 bad defenders in his starting lineup.

Developed nobodies like Naji, Jose to become solid nba rotation players.

Led Pels to a 6 game series with the Suns (without his best player all season) while overcoming a terrible start:

Has made some level of post season play every year he’s been the coach despite again having a best player that has been hurt every year.


On track to again make the playoff and increase the teams wins (improvement every year seems like all you can ask for?)

Willie isn’t perfect but the hate is crazy. He’s not underachieved yet (maybe this season if they fall off but we are right there in the race for the 5th seed).
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61582 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

He's a negative asset the moment he signs a new max deal.


If Lavine were healthy do you believe he is a negative asset? I was wrong, he's already started his new extension, $37 million this year and $49 in 2026-27. Before his season was derailed by injuries he was talked up as one of the players the Lakers would target. I didn't really see people talking about him as a negative contract like I did with CJ.

quote:

It was always understood that CJ would net something of value in return.


Maybe amongst the 30 GMs in the league, but I know the NBA twitter chatter seemed to view him very negatively because of his contract and decline in play due to a few injury plagued seasons. I know when he was kicked around here as a possible target way before that trade deadline, people talked about not wanting him and needing assets to take him.

However, my basic theme that I'm trying to get across is "Be careful what you wish for" and "The grass isn't always greener." Saying it's time to trade a player or fire a coach is one thing, Finding a replacement that's an actual improvement is another. If your reasoning is "Anything is better than this." that's basically asking the basketball gods to smite you, and the rest of us by extension. And I'm not saying that's your reasoning, just speaking generally because there are a lot of people, including myself, that don't think BI is going to work out long term with Zion.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 12:59 pm
Posted by msizzle08
Member since Dec 2019
650 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:01 pm to
Sacto has also been one of the healthiest teams in all the nba.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71242 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Sacto is 1.5 games ahead of us and hasn't won a playoff series as us with Willie as coach



This a confusing sentence. Are you saying we won a playoff series with Willie?

quote:

OKC hasn't won a playoff series or been to the playoffs as recently as we have.


But they did stomp us on our homecourt in the play-in... and that was without Chet in the mix.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
21232 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

This a confusing sentence. Are you saying we won a playoff series with Willie?


Sorry, I forgot to finalize the edit. They haven't won a playoff series just like Willie hasn't. They've had the exact same recent success as us.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
21232 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

they did stomp us on our homecourt in the play-in... and that was without Chet in the mix.


And we didn't have zion or Jose that game.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71242 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

And we didn't have zion or Jose that game.


My point is not about who won or lost that game based on availability, it's about what OKC has added since, which has them now playing like one of the best teams in the NBA.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
21232 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

My point is not about who won or lost that game based on availability, it's about what OKC has added since, which has them now playing like one of the best teams in the NBA.


Yeah, they look like beasts right now, I won't dispute how good they are, but I need to see them win a playoff series before I can say "they've blown past" the pels, otherwise they just won a few more games on us in one isolated season.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 1:21 pm
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71242 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

"they've blown past" the pels,


I mean it's all semantics and hyperbole whichever way you want to call it.

Fact of the matter is, they are in a better position than us both in the present and how they are set up for the future.

But like I said earlier, getting back to the topic at hand, I don't think that's Willie's doing or lack of doing. OKC built their roster to compliment each other, we didn't.

That's more on Griff and Trajan.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111147 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

If Lavine were healthy do you believe he is a negative asset?
Yes

He was healthy for a time this season. And all of the pods from Lowe to Windhorst, etc....talked about how Chicago has been shopping him all season long, and no one wants him.

quote:

I didn't really see people talking about him as a negative contract like I did with CJ.
I could be wrong but I don't recall people saying CJ was a negative contract until the extension was signed. We gave up a very high level role player in Josh Hart and a 1st, so he clearly was not a negative value contract. i don't recall anyone whose opinion you value saying POR would have to give us a 1st to send us CJ or anything like that.
quote:

Maybe amongst the 30 GMs in the league, but I know the NBA twitter chatter seemed to view him very negatively because of his contract and decline in play due to a few injury plagued seasons
But again, remember, he signed an extension. That IMO is when the concerns about contract popped up. Those are wrong too lol, but I digress.
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8445 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Fact of the matter is, they are in a better position than us both in the present and how they are set up for the future.

But like I said earlier, getting back to the topic at hand, I don't think that's Willie's doing or lack of doing. OKC built their roster to compliment each other, we didn't.

That's more on Griff and Trajan.



Also has to do with the fact that their #1 has continually improved and is now a locked in MVP candidate and we're happy our main guy gives us borderline all-star level play and stays on the court

I guess you could blame Zion plateauing on Willie, but I think that's more of a Zion issue than anything...
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111147 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

and we're happy our main guy gives us borderline all-star level play and stays on the court
Yep

Every time Zion scores 30, it's "If Zion can play like this, we're a contender."


Yeaaaaa, but he doesn't. Dudes like SGA actually do it.

Zion has scored 30+ 6 times this season. 35+ once with a season high of 36 points.

Zion averaging 30ppg isn't happening. We can discuss the reasons, but it's simply not happening.


Hell, the biggest reason is minutes per game. If he scored 30ppg on his current 30mpg, that would quite literally put him up with Embiid as the NBA's all time best points per minute.
Posted by DetroitEWarren
Member since Jan 2024
110 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 2:55 pm to
This is not true. In their 5 years together, off the top of my head, I think they have both scored over 25 in the same game maybe 8-10 times at most, if that. Let alone both over 30, which has happened maybe once.

They have never looked dominant together, and even when they win big, the team plays better in those games when one of them are on the bench. BI most of the time.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111147 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 3:08 pm to
My numbers may be wrong but this is what I got:

- Team overall record: 28-21
- When both play: 20-16
- Zion with no BI: 1-1
- BI with no Zion: 4-4
- No BI or Zion: 2-0



But over the years and larger sample size, we always perform well enough without BI, but we fail bigly without Zion.



But this season, we have a lower win % when both play than when 1 or both are out over that 12 game sample.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 3:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram