- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Madison Brooks case cell phone data now in defense’s hands
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:19 pm to JDPndahizzy
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:19 pm to JDPndahizzy
Why is this case still getting so much attention. We know from their own admittance that those assholes raped her then let her out the car in the middle of the road to get ran over and killed.
we also know from her sorority sisters that this wasn't uncommon behavior for her. doesn't change the fact that they are guilty.
it sucks for the family but there is no saving her "character" at this point anyway. not sure why some folks on this board are simping for her so hard.
we also know from her sorority sisters that this wasn't uncommon behavior for her. doesn't change the fact that they are guilty.
it sucks for the family but there is no saving her "character" at this point anyway. not sure why some folks on this board are simping for her so hard.
2
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:24 pm to bott18240
quote:
assume this would be to try and paint her in the worst possible light? Otherwise what the hell is the relevance?
Might be hoping she sent a text along the lines of "I'm going to get plastered and hook up with a rando".
Probably won't find it but it's the only way to get around her blood alcohol level.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:25 pm to Corinthians420
Yes. They admitted to having sex with a person who was three times the legal drunkenness limit. She couldn’t decline anything. This is an open and shut case.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:27 pm to andwesway
quote:
because it involves a somewhat attractive little white girl and some black kids. If she hadn't have been drunk as shite and hit by a car, nobody would care.
The first part is you projecting, the second part is why this is a story. She’s dead. If she hadn’t have been killed by a car, it wouldn’t be a story.
This post was edited on 1/8/24 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:29 pm to In The Know
quote:
Yes. They admitted to having sex with a person who was three times the legal drunkenness limit.
I don't remember the facts specifically, but I think the driver said he thought he saw them having sex, but I'm not sure if the 2 accused of doing the actual rape ever admitted to it.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:32 pm to bott18240
quote:
Otherwise what the hell is the relevance?
Prosecution has to turn over any exculpatory evidence they may have this her cell phone data. Can be a mistrial if they don't.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
I thought they had video of them admitting she was super drunk and they were gonna have sex with her? Or am I making that up?
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:34 pm to Ribbed
quote:
Where I come from character has an actual meaning
quote:
Ribbed
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:35 pm to tigafan4life
quote:
I thought they had video of them admitting she was super drunk and they were gonna have sex with her? Or am I making that up?
Allegedly Carver himself recorded a selfie video saying "These guys are crazy. They finna rape her."
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:39 pm to Trout Bandit
quote:
Ribbed
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Not really that big of a gotcha as you think it is.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:41 pm to jdd48
quote:
Allegedly Carver himself recorded a selfie video saying "These guys are crazy. They finna rape her."
I think that's what I remember.
The fact that there was no real DNA is going to create a lot of holes if Carver is the only one who saw/said that stuff on video. That's why he's asking for his co-defendant's phones I imagine, to see what they said about it after the fact.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The fact that there was no real DNA is going to create a lot of holes
If I recall the no real DNA report was from the autopsy and not when she first arrived at the hospital. Wasn't there a few days from her being brought into the hospital and her being pronounced dead?
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:49 pm to TigerFred
I can't comment on the holes in the investigation, only the ones in the prosecution/theory.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:54 pm to JDPndahizzy
I really feel for the Brooks family in this case. They already lost their daughter... now they have to listen to the defense dismantle her character and they can't do anything about it. I could never in a million years be a criminal defense attorney.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:55 pm to TigerFred
no. they kept her body hooked up to machines as they waited for her father to fly in. If they had taken her off of life support, they could not harvest the organs. unfortunately, I know this
This post was edited on 1/8/24 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:56 pm to geauxkw
quote:
I they took her off of life support, they could not harvest the organs. unfortunately, i know this
What do you mean by this?
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:58 pm to BeachDude022
quote:
She was a young, hot, college girl that liked to drink and party. All of this is a given to ANY college girl like this. Still doesn’t mean she deserved the fate she received.
Raise your sons and daughters better, guys. The court system is there to clean up a mess, not prevent it.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:59 pm to JAMAC2001
I was at the hospital, and passed by the room she was in numerous times. that day and night
Posted on 1/8/24 at 4:15 pm to JAMAC2001
At what point will a judge allow any cell phone "evidence" beyond that night to be allowed in court? I've heard cases where events that occurred the night of were used to character smear but nothing beyond that.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 4:26 pm to This GUN for HIRE
quote:
What would the 72 hours before on her cell prove? Sounds like someone got to the judge. More crooked BR bullshite, it seems.
The specifics re this case were pointed out earlier but this is really the type of case the defense has a right to know just in a general sense. If there is nothing admissible (ie all irrelevant) then it should not be allowed to be presented to the jury.
I will give a hyperbolic example of something that could be highly relevant: 30 minutes before leaving the bar she sends a text to a friend that states I found the guy that dumped Heather and I am going to drop rape charges on him and his a-hole friends. The chances of that being the case are 1 in billions but there is a chance something is in her phone that changes the reasonable view of the events that led up to her death. The defense has a right to determine if there is anything admissible/relevant in her phone.
Alleged rape victims always get smeared in civil or criminal cases up to the edge of turning off the jury. tOT is very good at doing it when they feel more sympathy for the accused.
Page 3 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News