- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Our OOC games suck in years to come!
Posted on 12/9/08 at 10:31 pm to KindOfABigDeal
Posted on 12/9/08 at 10:31 pm to KindOfABigDeal
quote:
They have to though because of the weak conference and no conference championship. They need it for the strength of schedule or perceived SOS. It's the times we live in.
no doubt. SC doesn't really have a choice, especially with the state of the Pac-10
0
Posted on 12/9/08 at 10:32 pm to lsutigers321
quote:
Maybe in the past, but not for the future.
SC's already made it public that we've been having a hard time finding big programs to give us a home and home. I've heard rumbling about an Alabama series possibly being in the works though
This post was edited on 12/9/08 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 12/9/08 at 10:33 pm to Tiger Phil
quote:
2017 - Oklahoma
quote:
2018 - @ Oklahoma
actually LSU has home and home in 2018 and 2019 with Oklahoma. Oklahoma has home and home with Ohio State in 2016 and 17
Posted on 12/9/08 at 10:34 pm to Jimmy2Times
Link?
Posted on 12/9/08 at 10:38 pm to lsutigers321
quote:
Link?
The LSU/Oklahoma matchup is not official through either University or athletic departments.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/9/08 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 12/10/08 at 8:46 pm to KindOfABigDeal
quote:History. This record is not typical of Washington. They will not be 0-12 next year. ULL, ULM, Rice, Tulane, UAB, etc. will forever be cupcakes, because they are. And they aren't attached to a serious BCS-type conference, no matter what you think of the Pac 10.
They went 0-12 this year, bro. If that doesn't define a cupcake, then what does?
Posted on 12/10/08 at 8:52 pm to threeputt
quote:Said the fan of a team too pussy to have a conference; hence, everything is OOC...AND SUCKS.
Tulane is on the up
Roll Military Academies
Posted on 12/10/08 at 9:08 pm to Ron Mexico
That list of OOC teams seems pretty good.
LSU would likely have beaten Washington, and unless the co-tards issues turns Tepper, there is no reason to think that LSU shouldn't be able to handle Washington next year.
But every other team on that list would have beaten LSU this year. No reason to panic. Seems a decent enough list.
LSU would likely have beaten Washington, and unless the co-tards issues turns Tepper, there is no reason to think that LSU shouldn't be able to handle Washington next year.
But every other team on that list would have beaten LSU this year. No reason to panic. Seems a decent enough list.
Posted on 12/10/08 at 9:12 pm to jacksimmons2000
talk about a rough start for a new coach check out Washington's first 3 weeks
LSU, Idaho, USC
having LSU and USC in the first 3 games, and having a new coach - ouch
LSU, Idaho, USC
having LSU and USC in the first 3 games, and having a new coach - ouch
Posted on 12/10/08 at 9:17 pm to Geauxtiga
I say we play Toolame (we are contract bound,
a shite La. school (La Tech, ULALALA, ULummm),
a good mid major (TCU, Boise, Fresno, Utah, BYU, USM, Troy...they deserve it)- ALWAYS @ home
and an "early season sponsor game" vs A&M rotated between Houston and New Orleans in the first two years $$$$$$$. Bama and Clemson got rich this year. Just my thoughts.
a shite La. school (La Tech, ULALALA, ULummm),
a good mid major (TCU, Boise, Fresno, Utah, BYU, USM, Troy...they deserve it)- ALWAYS @ home
and an "early season sponsor game" vs A&M rotated between Houston and New Orleans in the first two years $$$$$$$. Bama and Clemson got rich this year. Just my thoughts.
Posted on 12/10/08 at 9:49 pm to hobo with a rolex
quote:
talk about a rough start for a new coach check out Washington's first 3 weeks
Washington does this to themselves every year and I don't get it. They have had brutal schedules 3 years in a row now. Thy played Ohio st., OU, and then LSU next year along with good mid-majors like Boise and BYU. When you're that bad, you should at least make sure to win some games
Posted on 12/10/08 at 9:53 pm to TechinItEasy
quote:
That's a joke right?
Florida vs. Miami
Florida vs. FSU(every year)
Bama vs. Clemson
Bama vs. VT(next year)
UGA vs. GT(every year)
UGA vs. ASU
OM vs. WF
USCe vs. NCSt
USCe vs. Clemson(every year)
UT vs. UCLA and Cal
etc, etc, etc
Are you that stupid? Look at the majority of these game listed. They've been playing each other for 50+ years...Sorry that Tulane got a case of the suck. You do realize they were in the SEC...
Posted on 12/10/08 at 10:00 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
ULL is a cupcake. ULM is a cupcake. Rice is a cupcake. Tulane is supposed to be a cupcake. Troy is supposed to be a cupcake. UAB was supposed to be a cupcake. To put Washington in the same class as these real cupcakes is neither accurate nor smart. Washington is not a cupcake.
Yea, 2 wins in 2 years, that's not a cupcake
Posted on 12/10/08 at 10:41 pm to TechinItEasy
quote:Well, Va. Tech stepped up and played us home and home (eventually), so it is absolutely proven that LSU is willing to step up to play major OOC competition. Therefore, there must be a problem with the other teams. Aside from Washington, Arizona State, West Virginia (I guess?) and Oklahoma, apparently the other BCS schools are not willing to step up for the deal Va. Tech did.
There's no excuse for App St, Troy, North Texas, and Tulane
Posted on 12/10/08 at 10:47 pm to Pleasenewdc
quote:
Other than Washington, we play cupcakes
Did I miss something
Posted on 12/11/08 at 8:05 am to Pleasenewdc
quote:Yeah, but you see there was a time when Texas A&M fit that bill and LSU played them every year. Likewise, U of Miami. Then they started winning versus the Tigers, and both series went by the wayside (not that I think it was because they started winning, just changes in direction and scheduling contracts). Anyway, Washington, long term, is no cupcake. They will win again. It's a good addition to the schedule. The others, ULM, ULL, etc. are cupcakes, always were, always will be.
Yea, 2 wins in 2 years, that's not a cupcake
This post was edited on 12/11/08 at 8:08 am
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News