- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brian Kemp admits voting machines can be hacked.
Posted on 8/27/23 at 5:42 am to GumboPot
Posted on 8/27/23 at 5:42 am to GumboPot
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one. It would be so obvious, but I guess this is something you nitwits needed to hear?
16
Posted on 8/27/23 at 5:53 am to mmcgrath
quote:
if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software,
Why would someone have to only replace the software?
Posted on 8/27/23 at 5:56 am to mmcgrath
You actually think cheating in a presidential election was a spur of the moment action? That the didn’t have access to the same machines before the election or that replicating the hack wouldn’t be easier.
Having access to the voter rolls allowed them to drop ballots for non voters. Mistakes were made and there are hundreds of affidavits from people being told they had already voted.
It wasn’t any one method that got Joe to 81 million. It helps to have RINO help from WEF people like Kemp and turtle.
Having access to the voter rolls allowed them to drop ballots for non voters. Mistakes were made and there are hundreds of affidavits from people being told they had already voted.
It wasn’t any one method that got Joe to 81 million. It helps to have RINO help from WEF people like Kemp and turtle.
Posted on 8/27/23 at 6:09 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one. It would be so obvious, but I guess this is something you nitwits needed to hear?
You sound ignorant. These things don't have superpowers. A couple days?
Posted on 8/27/23 at 6:35 am to mmcgrath
(no message)
Posted on 8/27/23 at 6:39 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one. It would be so obvious, but I guess this is something you nitwits needed to hear?
Until you add that those machines were connected through Wi-Fi, then there is no need to bust seals and replace software. Why are people so opposed to doing it the right way and just go to paper ballots in person and hand counts? Guess honest elections only means as honest as one wants to believe, instead of everyone believes.
Posted on 8/27/23 at 7:15 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one. It would be so obvious, but I guess this is something you nitwits needed to hear?
Don’t you want secure elections? Russia hacked our elections.
Posted on 8/27/23 at 8:56 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one. It would be so obvious, but I guess this is something you nitwits needed to hear?
I guess you didn’t follow the Tina Peters story.
Posted on 8/27/23 at 9:08 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one.
Keep acting as though you know what you are talking about.
No one is buying what you are selling Maograth.
Posted on 8/27/23 at 9:26 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one. It would be so obvious, but I guess this is something you nitwits needed to hear?
Yeah, I agree. It’d be a lot easier to just scan the same set of ballots over and over.
Posted on 8/27/23 at 9:44 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one.
What’s stopping someone from doing that?
Nothing.
Machines that weren’t sealed were used.
Machines whose certification had lapsed for years were used.
Machines that didn’t meet the standards for certification were employed.
What’s the standard for ballot rejection on these machines? Why did voting tabulation machines fail that standard by not even being in the same galaxy in battleground state after battleground state?
Keep playing the idiot. We all see it’s not an act.
Posted on 8/27/23 at 11:08 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one.
You get dumber by the post
Posted on 8/27/23 at 6:48 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one.
Like the Trump team did in Coffee county?
Posted on 8/28/23 at 6:57 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one. It would be so obvious, but I guess this is something you nitwits needed to hear?
Clearly, you don't know squat about voting machines, nitwit.Posted on 4/1/24 at 11:07 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Yes, if someone could take the machines for a couple of days, break the seals, then replace the software, yes you can hack one. It would be so obvious, but I guess this is something you nitwits needed to hear?
Well, that's one way.
Posted on 4/1/24 at 6:05 pm to mmcgrath
you probably believe that unicorns are real too!
Posted on 4/3/24 at 6:41 am to mmcgrath
Actually one was hacked in less than ten minutes in a courtroom with a judge, jury, and observers present
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News