- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Germans convict 97 year old woman for being a secretary when she was a teenager.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 11:38 am to Liberator
Posted on 12/20/22 at 11:38 am to Liberator
quote:Dismissing the prosecution of granny as insignificant while defending George Soros is an incredible place to be.
This single case reeks of further reassertion of unequal application of justice FOR certain people BY certain Overlords. This while establishing precedence for ZERO statute of limitations, justifying Kangaroo Courts, and select In-Justice for select "enemies."
0
Posted on 12/20/22 at 11:41 am to AggieHank86
quote:
George Soros' proudly admitted role as a pro-Nazi teenage tool during WW2?
quote:
FFS. You can dislike the guy without spreading lies.
Please link his statements to this effect. Please do not waste time with memes of a photo depicting a completely different person. Thx
He admitted helping the Nazis in a 1998 interview on 60 Minutes. You didn't know about this? It was widely broadcasted, and can still be found on Youtube.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 11:41 am to Liberator
quote:First, silly to charge her given the facts, but ...
establishing precedence for ZERO statute of limitations
She was charged with conspiracy to commit murder.
In what state or nations is there a statute of limitations on murder charges?
Posted on 12/20/22 at 11:42 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Hey, I’m all for extraditing Soros and stripping him of his citizenship. Force him to go back to Hungary.
Why are others prosecuted and not Soros?
It seems you may actually now understand the question.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 11:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Why are others prosecuted and not Soros?
Of course its because of his politics and economic clout.
This is a legitimate question: Did any of Soros' alleged Nazi actions actually take place in Germany?
If not, that is probably the excuse Germany would give for not prosecuting him.
This post was edited on 12/20/22 at 11:46 am
Posted on 12/20/22 at 11:50 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:prosecuted for what? Exactly what do you contend he did?
Why are others prosecuted and not Soros?
Spending two days running errands for the local Jewish council?
This post was edited on 12/20/22 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:09 pm to wallowinit
Good to have another who recalls album comedy
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:14 pm to Strannix
quote:
Furchner went on the run weeks before her trial was due to begin, but was found by authorities after several hours.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:38 pm to tommy2tone1999
quote:I am well-aware of the broadcast, and he did not REMOTELY "proudly admit (a) role as a pro-Nazi ... tool," as the moron Liberator claims.quote:He admitted helping the Nazis in a 1998 interview on 60 Minutes.
George Soros' proudly admitted role as a pro-Nazi teenage tool during WW2?quote:
FFS. You can dislike the guy without spreading lies.
He admitted to running errands for the local Jewish Council, including delivering a summons that was used as a subterfuge to deport a few people. He says that he immediately stopped working for the Council when his father showed him what he was delivering. He also says that he told the recipients not to comply with the summons. This was VERY early, and I think he was 13yo at the time.
He also acknowledged that later he sometimes went with the Hungarian Christian man who was hiding him (pretending to be his godfather) when the man went to inventory the property of a deported Jewish family. As I recall, he was 15yo at the time.
That is what he "admitted," unless you are aware of something else.
As far as his state of mind ("pride"), he stated only that he felt no personal "guilt" about the Hungarian State taking the property of deported Jews, because he "was not doing it" and "had no role in taking that property." As a kid, he described himself as a "spectator" to the actions of the man who was hiding him.
You can argue that perhaps he should have felt more empathy. I would agree with you. That hardly makes him a "proud" Nazi collaborator.
======
AGAIN, it is entirely reasonable to dislike the man and his politics. I generally agree with you.
But fabricating lies about him -- just because you dislike his politics -- is just ... childish.
This post was edited on 12/20/22 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
First, silly to charge her given the facts, but ...
She was charged with conspiracy to commit murder.
We agree that it was "silly" to charge Frau Secretary -- given the facts ...
...Speaking of which -- do we know exactly what "the facts" were?
After all these decades, isn't this conviction and "conspiracy" to "commit murder" part of a show trial and frivolous, absurd stretch -- in the name of a "FINALLY GOTCHA, YOU NAZI SH*T!!"?
This woman (teenager at the time) was said to be merely a typist of clerical worker, recording and logging records.
quote:
In what state or nations is there a statute of limitations on murder charges?
"Conspiracy," Hank. (and what was her "weapon"? A Corona typewriter?)
Kangaroo Courts can hang "conspiracy" on any scapegoat or ham sandwich any time they want. (Or on passersbys during certain ongoing capitol hearings
) This post was edited on 12/20/22 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:47 pm to tommy2tone1999
quote:
He admitted helping the Nazis in a 1998 interview on 60 Minutes.
Yep.
He assisted the Germans.
Lefties spin it that he was young and impressionable, and didn't actually confiscate stuff himself. I imagine they have the same compassionate view about Jerry Jones, eh?
quote:
Soros said yes specifically in response to Steve Kroft noting that “you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson … went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews,”
This post was edited on 12/20/22 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:49 pm to Wildcat1996
quote:
A 97-year-old former secretary at a Nazi concentration camp has been convicted for her role in the murder of 10,505 people during the Holocaust, in what could be the final trial of its kind.
This is the equivalent of giving all the senior management of Enron a pass but then they go and prosecute all the entry level positions. Aside from some of the really big names in Naziville, most of them either never got time or laughable sentences.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:50 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I am well-aware of the broadcast, and he did not REMOTELY "proudly admit (a) role as a pro-Nazi ... tool," as the moron Liberator claims.
1998 broadcast. An airing which Soros managed to restrict for several years. (Do you happen to recall any specific content?)
You can judge the degree of Comrade Soros' demeanor and degree of remorse OR glee in this 60 minutes 2 minute excerpt:
Bitchute 60 Minutes Interview
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:53 pm to Liberator
Snopes was all in protecting Soros by providing context.
Its a cult.
Snopes says disregard what Soros says, listen to them...they can interpret it for you!
Its a cult.
quote:
As Snopes noted, “Perhaps because of the way the 60 Minutes interview … was edited, or perhaps because Soros was blindsided by Steve Kroft’s accusatory line of questions, or both, his responses were contradictory and confusing.
Snopes says disregard what Soros says, listen to them...they can interpret it for you!
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:53 pm to Liberator
Your posts are as incoherent as Celtic Dog's free-verse at its worst, and it is apparent that you (unlike him) are not TRYING to be cute about it. You just cannot string two thoughts together OR write.
She was a nobody, and it was silly to prosecute her. I responded to the moronic assertion that this case creates "precedence" (precedent) for not having a statute of limitations.
Regardless of whether one agrees with the charges, she was charged with a homicide offense. Generally, such offenses do NOT HAVE a statute of limitations.
She was a nobody, and it was silly to prosecute her. I responded to the moronic assertion that this case creates "precedence" (precedent) for not having a statute of limitations.
Regardless of whether one agrees with the charges, she was charged with a homicide offense. Generally, such offenses do NOT HAVE a statute of limitations.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 12:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Soros said yes specifically in response to Steve Kroft noting that
“you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson … went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews,”
Check out the above posted two minute video excerpt -- Soros can hardly contain his nostalgic glow of memories in that same 60 Minutes interview. No shame. "NO RAGRETS". AT ALL.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 1:00 pm to Liberator
quote:
Check out the above posted two minute video excerpt -- Soros can hardly contain his nostalgic glow of memories in that same 60 Minutes interview. No shame. "NO RAGRETS". AT ALL
Yeah, he said he didn't regret it. If he hadn't, someone else would have.
Soros gets a pass because he funds the social dysfunction in the world.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 1:02 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Your posts are as incoherent as Celtic Dog's free-verse at its worst...
You forgot, "angry" this time.
quote:
I responded to the moronic assertion that this case creates "precedence" (precedent) for not having a statute of limitations.
Yes.
And my response to you is in the absurdity of filing and prosecuting an 80 year old "conspiracy" to murder charge against a secretary (who was a teenager.)
This was NOT "Murder" in the sense of an act or THE act.
"Conspiracy" = Indirect Involvement = indictment can be comically broad reaching. So cut the sanctimonious bullsh*t.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 1:07 pm to Liberator
quote:No, I did not. When posters seem "angry, I use that term. When posters seem "incoherent," I use that term.
Your posts are as incoherent as Celtic Dog's free-verse at its worst...quote:
You forgot, "angry" this time.
English 101.
As a general rule, your posts are simply incoherent, not "angry."
Posted on 12/20/22 at 1:08 pm to AggieHank86
As a general rule, your posts are simply incoherent, not "angry."
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News