Started By
Message

re: BREAKING: Trump describes process of how he declassified documents found at Mar-a-Lago

Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:23 pm to
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
36244 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:23 pm to
That’s the weakest fricking defense for breaking the law I’ve heard in a while. Good lord.
Posted by jbdawgs03
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
9771 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:26 pm to
Wager on conviction?
Posted by NCIS_76
Member since Jan 2021
5246 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:28 pm to
Dlt
This post was edited on 8/12/22 at 8:35 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116329 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

That’s the weakest fricking defense for breaking the law I’ve heard in a while. Good lord.


Mission Accomplished by the Biden Admin. You morons who don’t understand a thing just care about the perception.

You’re clueless.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
31248 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

That’s the weakest fricking defense for breaking the law I’ve heard in a while.


Please explain to us what is necessary for him to declassify.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35487 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

That’s the weakest fricking defense for breaking the law I’ve heard in a while. Good lord.
seriously. "Deemed declassified"? So not actually classified?

And that supposed order, taken to this extreme definition, would essentially allow him to palm every single top secret document without naming a single one?

No court would uphold that order as meaning he can take classified documents to the residence, not that he could take them home when he is finished as president.

How could any of you sycophants defend such an order as Trump claims?
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45246 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

That’s the weakest fricking defense for breaking the law I’ve heard in a while. Good lord.



He actually has one. What was hiliary's defense for destroying evidence and not protecting classified information?
Posted by Logician
Grinning Colonizer
Member since Jul 2013
4532 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

That’s the weakest fricking defense for breaking the law I’ve heard in a while. Good lord.
Hilary used “no intent”, you disingenuous hack bitch. The same lesson all children learn, and the basis of law regarding the fundamental principal of how “ignorance is no excuse” was the literal excuse she used. And you ate it up.

Alleged pedophile Bill Clinton used “depends what the definition of ‘is’ is”, and you ate that word salad all up, didn’t ya lil piggie.

But THIS is the weakest argument you’ve ever heard. LOL.
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
3897 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

That’s the weakest fricking defense for breaking the law I’ve heard in a while. Good lord.


What's freaking weak is progs and deep state henchmen believing they can re-classify the previously de-classified materials to TRUMP up a bunch of bogus charges to prevent DJT from seeking re-election.
He can't keep getting away with it!!!!
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6803 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 10:25 pm to
Doesn't even come close to "what difference does it make"
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64767 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 10:58 pm to
Frothman
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19796 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

That’s the weakest fricking defense for breaking the law I’ve heard in a while. Good lord.



Go suck Obama's ...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram