Started By
Message
locked post

I know all about the "gentlemen's agreement"; however...

Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:13 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99074 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:13 pm
...would UGA really lose a lot if Ga. Tech came into the SEC? They were in the conference before (a founding member as I recall). Because of their academic standards, I really would not expect a big drop off for UGA's recruiting.
Posted by TheSandman
Notasulga
Member since Nov 2010
19411 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:15 pm to
Multiple sources have reported that there isn't one. More than have definitively reported that it exists.
Posted by Hubbhogg
Fayettechill
Member since Dec 2010
13443 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:16 pm to
I would take about 10 teams before Ga. Tech. personally. They bring nothing to the table...at all
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49805 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

They were in the conference before (a founding member as I recall).


They bailed, frick em
Posted by RhodeIslandRed
Adrift Off the Spanish Main
Member since Aug 2009
3175 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:20 pm to
They were charter members of the SEC. The only defector I'd be willing to welcome back is Sewanee. Georgia Tech and Tulane can both go straight to hell.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:26 pm to
if GT was to leave the ACC, it would be for the B1G imo. same with that shite stain of a school, maryland.
Posted by vegas-tiger
NV desert
Member since Dec 2003
2061 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:30 pm to
Tulane left the SEC...how about we bring them back.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:31 pm to
tulane can kiss the very brownest part of my arse....





























Posted by h2odawg
Seattle
Member since Sep 2011
16 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:37 pm to
41% of the tv viewership in Atlanta are college football fans. Second only to NYC in terms of pure number of overall fans. A great deal of those are UGA grads or tied to the school already. Adding GT, which UGA plays them every year already, would cannibalize some of what the SEC has and not really amount to a great deal for the net gain.

They are more a basketball school, so the ACC works better for them. Football, they are good about once every 20 years for a year or two before returning to average or below.

GT could play more SEC schools in its open weeks, but they don't. There's a reason. They just would not hold up. Who runs the triple option in the SEC and lives?

Sure they look sound, at times, against UNC and NCSt or Wake Forest, but those are not FL, UT, Auburn, AL, LSU, or even UGA (careful I don't get bit/jinxed saying that this year.)
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

They bring nothing to the table...at all


This. No real fan base. They may only be the 4th largest fan base in ATL. Small stadium and abysmal attendance. I have no clue why people keep thinking they would be a good add.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99074 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 4:47 pm to
Valid points all. Just asking the question.

Oh, and frick Tulane.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58117 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 6:47 pm to
quote:


GT could play more SEC schools in its open weeks, but they don't. There's a reason.


yea, its called SEC teams want auto wins at home against teams like Western Kentucky.
Posted by gatorrocks
Lake Mary, FL
Member since Oct 2007
13969 posts
Posted on 9/26/11 at 6:59 pm to
There isn't but all it takes is one president to say no and the vote would be over.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram