Started By
Message
locked post

Consensus on Mizzou joining SEC

Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:27 pm
Posted by wesman21
Youngsville
Member since Jun 2009
2916 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:27 pm
Does anyone really like this move? Are we just taking them so we can add a 14th team and move on?

I know the TV markets are strong, but, in my opinion, it would make more sense to wait it out and get a better program with an equally good if not better TV market.

My ideal adds were: Texas AM, Texas, Texas Tech, Baylor to the west and Fla State, Ga Tech, West Virginia and Virginia Tech in the east.

Thoughts?

SORRY, should have been in the SEC rant, damn. I'm just pissed, I really don't want Mizzou.
This post was edited on 10/21/11 at 12:37 pm
Posted by W
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
6100 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:28 pm to
Please move to SEC Rant
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
51280 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Thoughts?


LINK
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53417 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51912 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:32 pm to
Kinda meh about it.

But they could have done a LOT worse with the pick so...
Posted by NastyTiger
Hammond/Baton Rouge/Lafayette
Member since Jun 2005
11271 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:41 pm to
Dont want mizzou.

Definitely like the addition of A&M though.
Posted by otowntiger
O-Town
Member since Jan 2004
15650 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:42 pm to
Don't like it. They bring nothing to the table and don't make the conference stronger, just like aTm. It only makes scheduling more complicated and waters down the conference strength. It's like adding another Miss State or Ole Miss to the League.
Posted by otowntiger
O-Town
Member since Jan 2004
15650 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Please move to SEC Rant
Why do you really care? Why has everyone around here got to be board assignment police?
Posted by Starchild
Member since May 2010
13550 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:51 pm to
Don't like it. They just don't seem to fit in and their sports teams aren't all that great. I like A&M being in, but would have rathered FSU, VT, Clemson as the 14th...even WVU would be better imo
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:52 pm to
They don't fit in at all.
Posted by The312
I Live in The Three One Two
Member since Aug 2008
6967 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Consensus on Mizzou joining SEC


Sucks a cack.

Then again, accepting TAMU was also an act of fellatio, since it adds nothing athletically and has the potential to harm LSU's recruiting.

Should have simply left the best conference in the land alone.

Stupidity born of cupidity.
Posted by bigwheel
Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2008
6491 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:01 pm to
OBAM one bad arse mistake
Posted by Starchild
Member since May 2010
13550 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

They don't fit in at all.



Yea ok. If none of them fit in then no one does and we might as well stay at 13
Posted by Brinner
Retirement home
Member since May 2008
2655 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Don't like it. They bring nothing to the table and don't make the conference stronger, just like aTm. It only makes scheduling more complicated and waters down the conference strength. It's like adding another Miss State or Ole Miss to the League


You are a tard.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:08 pm to
Huge thumbs down.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112352 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

quote: Please move to SEC Rant Why do you really care? Why has everyone around here got to be board assignment police?


Why cant the OP be smart enough to find the right board?

There are two boards this could go on and the Rant aint one of them
Posted by eelsuee
2B+!2B
Member since Oct 2004
4503 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:11 pm to
I feel kind of on Mizzou.
I was really hoping for VT first and second would be Georgia Tech, Clemson or FSU.
Posted by coldhotwings
Mississippi
Member since Jan 2008
6497 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

My ideal adds were: Texas AM, Texas, Texas Tech, Baylor to the west and Fla State, Ga Tech, West Virginia and Virginia Tech in the east.


So you want a 20-team conference?

Texas Tech and Baylor would be downgrades from Mizzou.

WVU is begging to get in but don't have as much to offer outside of football and basketball.

GA Tech bailed out of the SEC before.

Any ACC team requires a $20 million buy-out.

Texas said a millions times that they are not interested in SEC.


It helps to do research ya know.
Posted by Holden Caulfield
Hanging with J.D.
Member since May 2008
8308 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

TAMU was also an act of fellatio, since it adds nothing athletically

Outstanding track program and usually fields a decent baseball team. I'm not trying to endorse their inclusion but its not like they bring nothing to the table.
Posted by fabtigers
Charleston, SC
Member since Dec 2008
850 posts
Posted on 10/21/11 at 1:12 pm to
Screw Mizzou! They suck. And will probably join the weak-arse East division to make it even shittier.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram