- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Big XII has Lay-away Plan for TCU
Posted on 10/12/11 at 2:07 pm to Smoke Ring
Posted on 10/12/11 at 2:07 pm to Smoke Ring
Got to go pay the light bill and head to my job at the Package Store.
See you homos, Froggies, and Mountain-tards later.
TCU, better not be late on that Big 12 lay-away.
See you homos, Froggies, and Mountain-tards later.
TCU, better not be late on that Big 12 lay-away.
0
Posted on 10/12/11 at 2:13 pm to Smoke Ring
quote:
No, I'm country. I've actually gigged frogs and don't so quickly turn to the homo like you apparently do.
So the question really is:
You gay, bay?
Seriously, what is gigging?
Posted on 10/12/11 at 2:26 pm to SM6
Posted on 10/12/11 at 2:27 pm to Smoke Ring
quote:
Posted by Smoke Ring
No interest in losing? The mighty Patterson, he of the short sleeved mock turtleneck ( ) just got smoked by BAYLOR.
We thumped a knot on SMU's head. How did y'all do, Froggie?
And we already played and beat Patterson. Why schedule a gimmie in front of 35k in Fort Worth, when we've scheduled real teams like Clemson, Va Tech, Notre Dame, etc.
We lost to two bowl-bound teams with a team that is two-thirds freshmen and sophomores after finishing in the top 7 three years in a row with two BCS bowl berths and a Rose Bowl Championshop. Losing to two teams headed to bowls is alright in my book with this young team.
Our stadium held 50K until the demo this past winter, but keeping making shite up, Faggie.
You also beat Patterson when he was an interim coach over a decade ago. We've finished in the top 10 almost as many times
since then (four) as times y'all have been to a bowl at all (five).
Posted on 10/12/11 at 2:38 pm to Smoke Ring
quote:
The SEC's offer is for full and complete financial SEC membership from the day we join in 2012.
Are you sure? I thought Texas A&M will receive a prorated share equal to the current SEC payout for 2011. That payout will continue until a new TV deal is reached.
Atleast that's what I read in the NYTimes
Posted on 10/12/11 at 2:54 pm to TigerintheNO
TigerintheNO,
Positive.
Positive.
Posted on 10/12/11 at 3:04 pm to powerbelly51
quote:
Gigging
Damn, that sure is hick.
Posted on 10/12/11 at 3:05 pm to Smoke Ring
holy shite Smoke Ring, you sound just as trollish and arrogant as Sao.
congrats
congrats
Posted on 10/12/11 at 3:19 pm to Dr RC
Thank you Richard Copeland PhD. 
Posted on 10/12/11 at 3:39 pm to Smoke Ring
thanks for proving my point smart guy
Posted on 10/12/11 at 3:40 pm to Dr RC
quote:
holy shite Smoke Ring, you sound just as trollish and arrogant as Sao.
Welcome aboard, Smoke!
Posted on 10/12/11 at 3:45 pm to Sao
You two should do a podcast
Posted on 10/12/11 at 3:45 pm to TIGERSandFROGS
quote:
Everyone criticizing this has no idea what they are talking about. Nebraska isn't getting a full share. Colorado isn't getting a full share. Utah isn't getting a full share. I haven't heard about A&M or Syracuse and Pitt, but I'd bet Syracuse and Pitt aren't though A&M might get a full share off the back. This is standard operating procedure.
In all those cases a conference is expanding, and thus dividing the current TV revenue pool more ways.
In the Big 12 you currently have $X split 10 ways, then A&M leaves, then TCU takes that spot, now you still have $X to split, but one school must take less money? Essentially the remaining schools are saying, "Look newbie, we're going to keep more of this cash...because we can. You get less." If ten teams were going to divide up $200 million ($20M each, lets say) and then they swap a team out and that team gets $5M, so does each other school now get $1.67M more? How are they dividing up the difference between TAMU's 2012 distribution and TCU's distribuition?
I think its pretty crappy if the Pac 10 did the same thing with CU and Utah as well because they just signed new contracts that included all 12 teams presumably. Nebraska, I can understand, they were joining an established conference (including joining inon proceeds of Big Ten network which they took no risk to start like the other 11 schools) and they are diluting the revenue pool by an extra mouth to feed.
This post was edited on 10/12/11 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 10/12/11 at 3:46 pm to Dr RC
But we couldn't see all of Sao's funny A&M pictures if we did a podcast 
Posted on 10/12/11 at 4:23 pm to TIGERSandFROGS
quote:
This is standard operating procedure.
obviously, my gawd.
seems to me many at a&m suffer from a large inferiority complex....
Posted on 10/12/11 at 4:24 pm to rocket31
Is this where you post now?
Posted on 10/12/11 at 4:25 pm to rocket31
quote:
seems to me many at a&m suffer from a large inferiority complex.
Nah man, they are a far superior school and athletic program compared to Texas. No little brother syndrome whatsoever.
Posted on 10/12/11 at 4:29 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Is this where you post now?
i dabble here a bit...
private message: is your arse ever gone come visit?
Posted on 10/12/11 at 4:29 pm to TK421
quote:
No little brother syndrome whatsoever
its pretty apparent and this is coming from someone who could give two-shits less about either program
Posted on 10/12/11 at 7:44 pm to Smoke Ring
quote:
TCU will gradually receive full revenue in the Big 12, reports Stefan Stevenson of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. TCU will earn 50 percent of the normal $17 million payout in the 2012-13 academic year, 67 percent in 2013-14, 84 percent in 2014-15, and 100 percent in 2015-16.
How did Aggie's deal work out with the SEC...is it anything like that?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News