- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So far Baylor and Purdue have made better hires than LSU
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:53 am to BayouBengals18
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:53 am to BayouBengals18
Can't say they made better hires without seeing their first 3 years at the program. That's just your opinion man.
1
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:53 am to LMfan
No shite. The downpour of the crybabies would have been strong had Alleva hired Rhule.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:54 am to Dizz
quote:
Hiring an unproven mid major guy is just as risky as O.
I'd say hiring an unproven mid major guy who was successful in the mid majors is much less risky than hiring Coach O.
Example : Every school that's hired a successful mid-major coach, compared to the schools that wanted Coach O in the past few years.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:55 am to Dizz
quote:
Hiring an unproven mid major guy is just as risky as O.
Not really. Unproven mid majors stepping up work out a decent amount, when is the last time a coach as bad as O actually turned it around and was successful?
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:55 am to BallChamp00
By that thinking everyone is equal until they start the job?
Past performance & previous experience can't be used as a metric when the intital hire is made?
I guess I could be a candidate to coach LSU if resumes and previous performance do Not matter.
Past performance & previous experience can't be used as a metric when the intital hire is made?
I guess I could be a candidate to coach LSU if resumes and previous performance do Not matter.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:56 am to ItsThatDude12
How was Sabans resume?
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:57 am to BallChamp00
quote:
How was Sabans resume?
Far superior to O's.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:58 am to BallChamp00
quote:
How was Sabans resume?
Really?
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:58 am to BayouBengals18
quote:
when is the last time a coach as bad as O actually turned it around and was successful?
This is where the idiots start mentioning Pete Carroll and Bill Belichick.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:58 am to LMfan
quote:
LSU fans would have dragged Alleva to no end if he ended up with Rhule.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:59 am to LMfan
I agree w OP. A joke of a hire for LSU. Not O's fault. So I don't hate him. Should of been a search across country after Fisher and Herman and that's after negotiating w Herman and trying to win his services.
Alleva is the cancer of LSU athletics.
Alleva is the cancer of LSU athletics.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:01 am to BayouBengals18
1 good year and barely getting to 3 bowls and losing the bowl game. This board would be crying like they are now when Saban was hired.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:03 am to BallChamp00
People wanted him gone after his 4th game lol.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:03 am to 7nette
quote:
This is where the idiots start mentioning Pete Carroll and Bill Belichick
Yeah, but neither were even close to as bad as O. Carroll went 6-10 with the NYJ one year, then was better than .500 in NE. BB was just under .500 in Cleveland. O never even came close to .500 at OM. Hell, the talent was there considering they went to the Cotton Bowl the next 2 years with Houston Nutt as coach.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:06 am to ItsThatDude12
quote:
So far Baylor and Purdue have made better hires than LSU
Matt Rhule would not be a good hire for LSU. Seriously, I don't think he looks like a great hire for Baylor. I really like Jeff Brohm but his next job was at a place like Purdue not LSU although I could see someone make an argument for the hire unlike Rhule.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:07 am to BallChamp00
Dude, Saban was 34-24 at MSU, O was 10-25(3-21) at Ole Miss.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:08 am to BallChamp00
quote:
Can't say they made better hires without seeing their first 3 years at the program. That's just your opinion man.
at this moment, they are better hires
its not debatable
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:08 am to BayouBengals18
O has always been a top notch recruiter. He left Nutt great players. His problem was coaching. He has learned and has a 11-4 10-3 record after learning. But I guess we don't count those.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:09 am to Salmon
We hired a 11-4 coach in his last 2 head coaching jobs. Terrible.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:10 am to BallChamp00
quote:
We hired a 11-4 coach in his last 2 head coaching jobs. Terrible.
there you go again with the fallacy that interim HC is the same as HC
not to mention ignoring his real HC experience at OM
basically O's resume is that he makes a very good Larry Coker
This post was edited on 12/6/16 at 11:11 am
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News