- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Briles Seriously Being Considered For OC At LSU?
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:14 am to DthVllyDud
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:14 am to DthVllyDud
Briles is not coming here. You don't have to worry.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:19 am to LuckyTiger
Nobody on here knows anything and if you think differently you are a fricking mouth breathing ape
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:40 am to LuckyTiger
frick no Briles isn't being considered. Anyone who says he should be is taking a pro rape stance.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:45 am to LuckyTiger
our dumbass retarded fans keep pushing this "zomg let's be the bad guys, us against them, frick integrity" mindset while being completely oblivious to the fact that you have to go through the parents of recruits to even get them on campus. It's pretty embarrassing to watch
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:49 am to ipodking
quote:
frick no Briles isn't being considered. Anyone who says he should be is taking a pro rape stance.
Not saying it's right or wrong, but does hiring O mean that we condone domestic violence?
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:50 am to LuckyTiger
haven't seen anything about briles to lsu anywhere but here
Posted on 12/4/16 at 10:14 am to LuckyTiger
Only some morons on the rant are considering him. He is untouchable.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 10:31 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
Or is it simply desperate lsu fans grabbing for hope like a drowning man grabbing for driftwood?
This
Posted on 12/4/16 at 10:31 am to LuckyTiger
No! If he is, I will personally lead the media's fight against this scumbag.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 10:46 am to Bumsfatbaby
Saban hired the dumpster fire of Lane Kiffen, and the larger dumpster fire of Sark, he just doesn't allow them to speak publicly. Nobody beats him up for those hires.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 10:51 am to pellietigersaint
quote:
Nobody on here knows anything
Posted on 12/4/16 at 11:24 am to lsu2006
quote:
I always knew our fans were delusional but I never thought we'd stoop to borderline Penn State levels of delusion and arse-backwardsness. I take solace in the fact that it's probably a small, inconsequential segment of our fan base
What I'm noticing is there's a segment of the fanbase that really doesn't know anything about the case and assumes they do. You appear to be one of those.
I've posted a variation of this a couple times or more:
quote:
I really hadn't payed much attention to what went down at Baylor with Briles until his name started coming up on this board recently. The more I read about it, the more I believe Briles may gotten a raw deal from the Baylor admin.
For the one incident Briles knew of, the AD was already notified, Briles encouraged the girl to go to the police (but couldn't force her as she's an adult), and none of those players played again (though only one was still on campus at that time.)
If they had the goods on Briles, Briles likely doesn't sue the school for wrongful termination because he would've known they had the good on him during the termination process.
So what does Briles do? He sues them.
Does the school fight him and expose what they know? No. They settle by giving him a $20M payout-- which was most if not all of what he was owed on his contract.
Who sounds guilty in this... Briles or Baylor's admin? Baylor's admin from all I've seen.
I've noted a few people on here who bitch about the PR that Briles would bring. Most of these people seem very closed minded and lack objectivity. And they seem to be basing it mostly on the 60 minute piece that was made to draw ratings instead of looking at the facts. Would a few people get their panties in a wad? Sure. Most will get over it.
If you have something objective to bring to the table that would convince me I'm wrong that Briles was made the scapegoat there, feel free to educate me.
Nobody, when forced to go beyond a single bullshite line of hyperbole that Briles allowed rape/covered up rape/etc., can back it up. They're just parroting what they heard some other parrot say because it makes them feel morally superior to think they know what happened, even though they didn't.
So, are you going to be the one who educates me on what really happened and convince me that Briles wasn't made the scapegoat? Are you capable of going beyond your initial claim with any evidence whatsoever to validate it? Or are you just another parrot?
I truly am interested in hearing evidence if you can produce it. Because all of the morally superior people who tend to be adamantly anti-Briles give me the impression they're just running with a sound bite.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 11:27 am to LuckyTiger
Would be the only silver lining to this Orgeron as HC fiasco.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 11:27 am to epbart
While I agree with you, you have to admit there is a perception that Briles is tainted goods... Something that the ESPN douches will harp on. We not only have to deal with the truth, but with the perception.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 11:29 am to LuckyTiger
If he's not a HC he really doesn't have the power to cover up rapes anymore.
I still wouldn't consider him for an OC job in a million years.
I still wouldn't consider him for an OC job in a million years.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 11:31 am to epbart
The evidence is a Virgin was gang raped under a desk by multiple players and testified that she went to Baylor officials and coaching staff. They didn't report it to police and basically said ot was her fault and she was a ho.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 11:36 am to lsu2006
Forgiveness and Second Chance. If we win with Briles that's the narrative. Winning cures all.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News