- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gene Chizik----T or F: Worst hire than Kevin Steele was last year.
Posted on 12/31/15 at 6:19 pm to CaptainBrannigan
Posted on 12/31/15 at 6:19 pm to CaptainBrannigan
645 fricking rushing yards. Not total yds but rushing yds. Am I the only one who witnessed that? You people are crazy.
Btw, venables defense looking nasty against ou.
Btw, venables defense looking nasty against ou.
1
Posted on 12/31/15 at 6:48 pm to Moustache
quote:You are stupid their D is leaps and bounds better than last year.
645 fricking rushing yards. Not total yds but rushing yds. Am I the only one who witnessed that? You people are crazy.
Chizik has almost a flawless track record as a DC
Posted on 12/31/15 at 7:05 pm to VerlanderBEAST
645
Not to mention the nine skull frickings his defense took in 2012.
Not to mention the nine skull frickings his defense took in 2012.
This post was edited on 12/31/15 at 7:07 pm
Posted on 12/31/15 at 7:13 pm to Moustache
He's only in his second year as DC, and his defense vastly improved this year. He would be a great hire, from a coaching and recruiting standpoint.
Posted on 12/31/15 at 7:17 pm to Moustache
quote:
645
Not to mention the nine skull frickings his defense took in 2012.
You're stupid
UNC 2014:
39 points allowed per game
496 total yards allowed per game
232 rushing yards allowed per game
UNC 2015:
23 points allowed per game
411 total yards allowed per game
217 rushing yards allowed per game
This post was edited on 12/31/15 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 12/31/15 at 7:22 pm to VerlanderBEAST
645 yards. Most ever in a bowl.
Posted on 12/31/15 at 7:27 pm to Moustache
quote:Changes nothing
645 yards. Most ever in a bowl.
Posted on 12/31/15 at 7:45 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
Changes nothing
I can't even fathom giving up 300 yds rushing, let alone 645 yds rushing.
The last time Chizik was a good DC, the game was very different than it is now.
Baylor showed any team running read option could skull frick his defense into oblivion.
Posted on 12/31/15 at 7:45 pm to VerlanderBEAST
double post sorry.
This post was edited on 12/31/15 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 12/31/15 at 8:18 pm to Moustache
quote:
I can't even fathom giving up 300 yds rushing, let alone 645 yds rushing.
The last time Chizik was a good DC, the game was very different than it is now.
Baylor showed any team running read option could skull frick his defense into oblivion.
lol yup and after the beating Baylor gave them, their Rush D is still better than it was last year
Posted on 12/31/15 at 8:25 pm to Moustache
quote:
I can't even fathom giving up 300 yds rushing, let alone 645 yds rushing.
The last time Chizik was a good DC, the game was very different than it is now.
Baylor showed any team running read option could skull frick his defense into oblivion.
Repeat after me. Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Non-playoff bowl games are meaningless.
Write it on the board a thousand times. Live it. Learn it. Love it. For it is the truth.
If you don't realize this, then I can't do much to keep you from continuing to look like a fool in this thread.
Posted on 12/31/15 at 9:49 pm to 1999
You think? After he gave up 608 yds rushing to a team with no QB . I say chizik is overrated. NC gave up a lot of points this year
Posted on 1/1/16 at 4:53 am to Moustache
quote:x100000000
He is not the answer
Posted on 1/1/16 at 6:39 am to TampaTiger22
quote:
You think? After he gave up 608 yds rushing to a team with no QB . I say chizik is overrated. NC gave up a lot of points this year
They gave up a lot less points than they did last year
Posted on 1/1/16 at 7:15 am to Moustache
If we are going off one game, then we don't want Venables either.
Clemson and LSU both played Syracuse on the road this year.
LSU held Syracuse to 24 points, 127 rushing yards and 281 yards of total offense.
Venables let Syracuse score 27 points and rush for 242 yards
So clearly, based off that one game, Steele > Venables
Clemson and LSU both played Syracuse on the road this year.
LSU held Syracuse to 24 points, 127 rushing yards and 281 yards of total offense.
Venables let Syracuse score 27 points and rush for 242 yards
So clearly, based off that one game, Steele > Venables
Posted on 1/1/16 at 7:58 am to VerlanderBEAST
They play in the acc . That's not a tough task. They played one tough ACC opponent and gave up 30+
Posted on 1/1/16 at 9:53 am to CaptainBrannigan
We should have thrown in BDP at no charge to sweeten the deal.
Posted on 1/1/16 at 10:48 am to Moustache
You're insane if you think Gene is close to as bad as a Steele hire. Steele was about as bottom of the barrel as it gets. NOBODY wanted him as a DC after Clemson. Chiz had a very good history as DC before he became HC at AU. He also took a horrible UNC defense last year and made them respectable this year aside from the bowl game.
It's really not a comparison. He's miles better than a Steele hire.
It's really not a comparison. He's miles better than a Steele hire.
This post was edited on 1/1/16 at 10:50 am
Posted on 1/1/16 at 11:17 am to Moustache
quote:
Seriously, how could anyone want Chizik after that game?
Seriously, are you judging a coach solely on his last game? A relatively meaningly exhibition at that? Yes, lets ignore what ever gains UNC made from last year and by all means lets not consider he was the DC for 2 consecutive teams that went undefeated.
Posted on 1/1/16 at 12:36 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
lol Chizik is the best DC in college football.
44th in scoring defense
122nd rushing defense
19th passing defense
97th total defense
LINK
So again... what in the frick?
This post was edited on 1/1/16 at 12:40 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News