Started By
Message

re: USWNT pay out smh

Posted on 8/10/23 at 9:44 am to
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20753 posts
Posted on 8/10/23 at 9:44 am to
quote:

I dont see it as such.. they work every bit as hard and are more successful than the men's team..


Sue Bird deserves more money than Chris Paul
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
20871 posts
Posted on 8/10/23 at 9:51 am to
quote:

they work every bit as hard and are more successful than the men's team..



Here's a hypothetical:

Let's say the USWNT goes undefeated for 4 years in a row, wins the world cup...but there is one caveat. Zero people attend their games and zero people watch on TV.

Let's say the Men's team lose every game over that same 4 year period, and don't qualify for the world cup. However, they sell out every game and their TV ratings are off the charts.

Besides prize money, you seem to believe that players for both teams should either be making same amount of money or that the USWNT players should be making more because they are "more successful" at winning?
This post was edited on 8/10/23 at 10:23 am
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
13952 posts
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:02 am to
quote:

It baffles me that the men's team agreed to this bullshite.
It's pretty simple, it's pennies compared to their club wages and endorsements

The social ire is more expensive
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
7471 posts
Posted on 8/11/23 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

they would have an easy case.
unfortunately, they would lose big time in the court of public opinion

ETA : tiger droppings does not represent public opinion
This post was edited on 8/11/23 at 1:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram