Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

How Does England Support 4 Leagues?

Posted on 1/31/16 at 6:46 am
Posted by Hoyt
Alabama: The Beautiful
Member since Aug 2011
5394 posts
Posted on 1/31/16 at 6:46 am
Is it because there are really no other options regarding professional sports?
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64231 posts
Posted on 1/31/16 at 6:50 am to
Many of the teams are relatively small and localized and began/still are community clubs. Also it's one association that has "fluidity" between the leagues although there are obvious glass ceilings/floors.

Technically there are more than 4 leagues, I'm sure someone in here can explain it better than I can.
This post was edited on 1/31/16 at 7:05 am
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 1/31/16 at 7:16 am to
LINK

quote:

There are more than 140 individual leagues, containing more than 480 divisions.[1] The exact number of clubs varies from year to year as clubs join and leave leagues or fold altogether, but an estimated average of 15 clubs per division implies that more than 7,000 teams of nearly 5,300 clubs are members of a league in the English men's football league system.
Posted by LSUMJ
BR
Member since Sep 2004
19889 posts
Posted on 1/31/16 at 8:52 am to
Premier league
Championship
League one
league two

then this
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 1/31/16 at 10:04 am to
Rugby is exceptionally popular throughout the county. Cricket has immense support in Southern England.

England, and the UK in general, is very densely populated. There aren't many large cities, but there are plenty of decent sized towns. The local football club(s) represent the community far more than most American sports franchises. The closest simile in American sports would be college football and basketball.
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
28432 posts
Posted on 1/31/16 at 10:17 am to
quote:

The closest simile in American sports would be college football and basketball.

This is correct. Brits don't understand our support of college athletics but I think they would understand it more if they realized those are our "local clubs."
Posted by Henry Atkins
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2013
209 posts
Posted on 1/31/16 at 11:13 am to
It's because there are no college athletics. Universities in Europe are for education and not sports. The result is having many more professional teams. The great thing about the system is it allows the opportunity for a town with a population of 20,000 to have a professional team that could theoretically compete in the top flight if they are good enough and continue to be promoted.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 1/31/16 at 11:46 am to
quote:

there are no college athletics



This is false.
This post was edited on 1/31/16 at 11:49 am
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125412 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 5:35 am to
There are plenty of other options for pro sports

Rugby and cricket are huge and get good attendance
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 8:40 am to
quote:

It's because there are no college athletics.


Well they do but there's no scholarships and it's more like club sport. The Oxford and Cambridge boat race is a very big deal.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram