- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Both game winning goals for Honduras and Panama came from MLS players
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:02 pm
Ayyyyyy way to represent MLS
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:09 pm to MF Doom
The ugly truth is MLS has benefited other Concacaaf nations more than the US.
Need to have an honest post mortem talk about this cycle down the line when emotions are not as high
Need to have an honest post mortem talk about this cycle down the line when emotions are not as high
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:09 pm to MF Doom
Does the MLS have (and does it need) a homegrown/US born quota? Would that help the development?
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:13 pm to Tigerstark
Hell, most of the team for Panama and Honduras are current or former MLS players. Costa Rica has benefited, too.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:17 pm to MF Doom
quote:
Both game winning goals for Honduras and Panama came from MLS players by MF Doom
Ayyyyyy way to represent MLS
This is a bogus counter argument against the MLS. If you think that because other teams in the Americas are also developing it is ultimately hurting the USA, then you are just wrong.
Yes MLS has players from Central America who are helping those countries. But I would rather those countries be good and the USA just needs to be better (which with the population differences we should be).
If you want the USA to keep squeezing in the World Cup just because the rest of Concacaf is shite, and then we get dominated by the European and South American teams, then things will never change and USA soccer will always be mediocre.
If you ever want US soccer to truly be world class then you just have to accept that our neighbors will get better too, and that is not a bad thing.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:35 pm to bodask42
quote:
This is a bogus counter argument against the MLS
Hey man I like the MLS
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:38 pm to MF Doom
quote:
Hey man I like the MLS
my bad. I have seen some people post on here tonight that the MLS is bad for the reasons I spelled out, and I just think it is a silly argument.
If you were actually defending the MLS then I think we are on the same page
I just think we are all on edge tonight and super defensive
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:42 pm to Tigerstark
quote:
Does the MLS have (and does it need) a homegrown/US born quota? Would that help the development?
There needs to be some incentive to play young players. I don't really care if some average 27 year old is getting regular minutes, but it's a joke that a guy like EPB can't buy a start for SKC.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:44 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
. I don't really care if some average 27 year old is getting regular minutes, but it's a joke that a guy like EPB can't buy a start for SKC.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:52 pm to pvilleguru
But MLS does have a limit on how many foreign players you can have on the roster, but there's ways to get around that (looking at you, AUFC) and the foreign spots can be traded.
The issue is that there's not really an incentive to develop players, outside of to win the cup. If they do happen to sell a player to a European club, the league gets a portion of that money.
The issue is that there's not really an incentive to develop players, outside of to win the cup. If they do happen to sell a player to a European club, the league gets a portion of that money.
This post was edited on 10/10/17 at 11:55 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News