- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
You got what you wanted--NPR did a story on Seth Rich
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:00 am
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:00 am
LINK
quote:
During the presidential campaign, unfounded conspiracy theories regularly made their way from the fringes into mainstream news reports. That problem has not gone away. Last July, a 27-year-old staffer for the Democratic National Committee was shot to death here in Washington. D.C. police say it was a botched robbery.
That has not stopped a runaway conspiracy theory that Seth Rich's death was an assassination, that Rich gave DNC emails to WikiLeaks and was killed to cover it up. The outlets pushing this narrative without evidence include Breitbart, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News, where former House Speaker Newt Gingrich spoke about it yesterday morning.
quote:
HAPIRO: Can we just start with a simple fact check of Gingrich's remark that nothing serious has been done to investigate Rich's murder? Is that true?
WEIGEL: That's not true. Police have investigated this, and unfortunately it is one of the many unsolved murders in D.C. right now. It's one of the many unsolved crimes in the neighborhood of Bloomingdale.
SHAPIRO: You've mapped out how this story moved from the fringes to the mainstream. It's a complicated journey. But in a nutshell, how did this happen?
WEIGEL: Well, it really began as soon as Rich was killed. There were questions on the Internet. And what pushed it into the next level was Julian Assange of WikiLeaks doing a very meandering interview with a Dutch TV station where he, to paraphrase him, said our sources take precautions. For example, there's this man Seth Rich in D.C. who was killed. The interviewer pressed if that meant Seth Rich was a source. Assange would not say yes. And that is what Assange has done since then.
What happened over the last week is that first FOX 5, a local Fox affiliate in D.C., said it had new information on the case that literally was based on one interview with an outside investigator who recanted his story within 48 hours. That did not stop Sean Hannity on Fox and then Newt Gingrich later on Fox from furthering this. And it did not stop, I think, one entity we haven't mentioned yet, which is most intriguing, the Russian Embassy of the United Kingdom tweeting about this.
SHAPIRO: And we should say Russia has an interest in this because they have been blamed for the DNC hack. And if they can say that it was somehow this conspiracy theory linked to Seth Rich that might remove some pressure from them.
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:01 am to GetCocky11
How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly? He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 7:02 am
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:03 am to GetCocky11
This is a hit piece on Fox and other conservative media. How is this what I wanted?
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:03 am to GetCocky11
quote:
unfounded conspiracy theories regularly made their way from the fringes into mainstream news reports. That problem has not gone away.
In fact, it has become CNN's motto.
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:05 am to SirWinston
quote:What evidence? Assange never said anything, just acted like a little bitch.
How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly? He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:05 am to GetCocky11
So NPR says the Seth Rich story is also Russians.
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:05 am to SirWinston
quote:FWIW, their characterization of Assange's comments regarding Seth Rich are spot on.
How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly?
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:06 am to SirWinston
quote:
He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?
Well, no, he doesn't.
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:06 am to TrueTiger
Everything is due to the Russians.
Every
Damn
Thing
Every
Damn
Thing
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:09 am to Scruffy
I guess they won the cold war after all.
Who knew?
Who knew?
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:11 am to SirWinston
No he doesn't. Especially when he is noncommital. It's not testimony or evidence or anything
This whole stupid theory is a Nothing burger
This whole stupid theory is a Nothing burger
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:12 am to NC_Tigah
Assange' interview about Rich, where he pushes a reward for info on his murder doesn't leave any doubt that he was a client IMO. Was he the DNC leaker, don't know, but he was attached to Assange in some way. Pretty sure anyone who saw that interview would assume Rich is the DNC guy who leaked their emails, and can't blame them for making that jump...
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:12 am to GetCocky11
Republicans so want Pizzagate & Seth Rich to be true.
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:15 am to TrueTiger
quote:
I guess they won the cold war after all.
I think they won the long game. They infiltrated us in the 1940's/50's. Joseph McCarthy wasn't just pulling stuff out of his arse the entire time. He was on to something.
JFK wouldn't play along with the socialist agenda so he was taken out in order that LBJ could institute the Great Society.
Reagan was the hiccup. Clinton got everything back on track though.
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 7:17 am
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:15 am to Dignan
quote:
Republicans so want Pizzagate & Seth Rich to be true.
And Democrats want so much to wake up in the morning to Clinton being president instead of Trump to be true.
Ain't happening my friend.
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:22 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
Assange' interview about Rich, where he pushes a reward for info on his murder doesn't leave any doubt that he was a client IMO. Was he the DNC leaker, don't know, but he was attached to Assange in some way. Pretty sure anyone who saw that interview would assume Rich is the DNC guy who leaked their emails, and can't blame them for making that jump...
or Assange is a self serving douche who knew exactly what he was doing by implying Rich was his source
a dead source at that, one they can't deny the charge
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:24 am to Salmon
quote:
or Assange is a self serving douche who knew exactly what he was doing by implying Rich was his source
a dead source at that, one they can't deny the charge
That is how I read Assange's statements on this.
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:26 am to GetCocky11
quote:
the fringes
Equates to anytime you don't go along with the media
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:28 am to theunknownknight
If you look at socialism as a religion, that's hard to miss.
We are much more socialistic than we were in 1920 and the Soviets worked mightily to spread it not just here, but world over.
We are much more socialistic than we were in 1920 and the Soviets worked mightily to spread it not just here, but world over.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News