Started By
Message
locked post

You got what you wanted--NPR did a story on Seth Rich

Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:00 am
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51308 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:00 am
LINK

quote:

During the presidential campaign, unfounded conspiracy theories regularly made their way from the fringes into mainstream news reports. That problem has not gone away. Last July, a 27-year-old staffer for the Democratic National Committee was shot to death here in Washington. D.C. police say it was a botched robbery.

That has not stopped a runaway conspiracy theory that Seth Rich's death was an assassination, that Rich gave DNC emails to WikiLeaks and was killed to cover it up. The outlets pushing this narrative without evidence include Breitbart, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News, where former House Speaker Newt Gingrich spoke about it yesterday morning.


quote:

HAPIRO: Can we just start with a simple fact check of Gingrich's remark that nothing serious has been done to investigate Rich's murder? Is that true?

WEIGEL: That's not true. Police have investigated this, and unfortunately it is one of the many unsolved murders in D.C. right now. It's one of the many unsolved crimes in the neighborhood of Bloomingdale.

SHAPIRO: You've mapped out how this story moved from the fringes to the mainstream. It's a complicated journey. But in a nutshell, how did this happen?

WEIGEL: Well, it really began as soon as Rich was killed. There were questions on the Internet. And what pushed it into the next level was Julian Assange of WikiLeaks doing a very meandering interview with a Dutch TV station where he, to paraphrase him, said our sources take precautions. For example, there's this man Seth Rich in D.C. who was killed. The interviewer pressed if that meant Seth Rich was a source. Assange would not say yes. And that is what Assange has done since then.

What happened over the last week is that first FOX 5, a local Fox affiliate in D.C., said it had new information on the case that literally was based on one interview with an outside investigator who recanted his story within 48 hours. That did not stop Sean Hannity on Fox and then Newt Gingrich later on Fox from furthering this. And it did not stop, I think, one entity we haven't mentioned yet, which is most intriguing, the Russian Embassy of the United Kingdom tweeting about this.

SHAPIRO: And we should say Russia has an interest in this because they have been blamed for the DNC hack. And if they can say that it was somehow this conspiracy theory linked to Seth Rich that might remove some pressure from them.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81908 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:01 am to
How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly? He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 7:02 am
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32698 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:03 am to
This is a hit piece on Fox and other conservative media. How is this what I wanted?
Posted by Statestreet
Gueydan
Member since Sep 2008
12952 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:03 am to
So unbiased
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99134 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:03 am to
quote:

unfounded conspiracy theories regularly made their way from the fringes into mainstream news reports. That problem has not gone away.


In fact, it has become CNN's motto.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35413 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:05 am to
quote:

How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly? He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?
What evidence? Assange never said anything, just acted like a little bitch.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67998 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:05 am to
So NPR says the Seth Rich story is also Russians.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123954 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:05 am to
quote:

How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly?
FWIW, their characterization of Assange's comments regarding Seth Rich are spot on.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71925 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:06 am to
quote:

He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?




Well, no, he doesn't.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72131 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:06 am to
Everything is due to the Russians.

Every
Damn
Thing
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67998 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:09 am to
I guess they won the cold war after all.

Who knew?

Posted by UHTiger
Member since Jan 2007
5231 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:11 am to
No he doesn't. Especially when he is noncommital. It's not testimony or evidence or anything

This whole stupid theory is a Nothing burger
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62456 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:12 am to
Assange' interview about Rich, where he pushes a reward for info on his murder doesn't leave any doubt that he was a client IMO. Was he the DNC leaker, don't know, but he was attached to Assange in some way. Pretty sure anyone who saw that interview would assume Rich is the DNC guy who leaked their emails, and can't blame them for making that jump...
Posted by Dignan
Member since Sep 2005
13265 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:12 am to
Republicans so want Pizzagate & Seth Rich to be true.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57376 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:15 am to
quote:

I guess they won the cold war after all.


I think they won the long game. They infiltrated us in the 1940's/50's. Joseph McCarthy wasn't just pulling stuff out of his arse the entire time. He was on to something.

JFK wouldn't play along with the socialist agenda so he was taken out in order that LBJ could institute the Great Society.

Reagan was the hiccup. Clinton got everything back on track though.
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 7:17 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54213 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:15 am to
quote:

Republicans so want Pizzagate & Seth Rich to be true.


And Democrats want so much to wake up in the morning to Clinton being president instead of Trump to be true.

Ain't happening my friend.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83597 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:22 am to
quote:

Assange' interview about Rich, where he pushes a reward for info on his murder doesn't leave any doubt that he was a client IMO. Was he the DNC leaker, don't know, but he was attached to Assange in some way. Pretty sure anyone who saw that interview would assume Rich is the DNC guy who leaked their emails, and can't blame them for making that jump...


or Assange is a self serving douche who knew exactly what he was doing by implying Rich was his source

a dead source at that, one they can't deny the charge
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51308 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:24 am to
quote:

or Assange is a self serving douche who knew exactly what he was doing by implying Rich was his source

a dead source at that, one they can't deny the charge



That is how I read Assange's statements on this.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67493 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:26 am to
quote:

the fringes

Equates to anytime you don't go along with the media
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67998 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:28 am to
If you look at socialism as a religion, that's hard to miss.

We are much more socialistic than we were in 1920 and the Soviets worked mightily to spread it not just here, but world over.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram