- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
You be the judge...
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:20 pm
This one is really strange.
LINK
A sub teacher did a cartwheel with a skirt and no underwear (the kids saw her pussy).
I have several questions for you legal experts.
Why is 'assault' less serious than 'indecent exposure'. If I hit you over the head with a frying pan is it less serious than showing you Mr. Happy?
In other words...Nothing. Sub teachers make what? 40 bucks a day? She can make more at Starbucks. Then she can return to teaching.
Would your judgment have been different if she wasn't such an ugly woman?
LINK
A sub teacher did a cartwheel with a skirt and no underwear (the kids saw her pussy).
I have several questions for you legal experts.
quote:
pleaded guilty Monday to assault after the charge was reduced from indecent exposure.
Why is 'assault' less serious than 'indecent exposure'. If I hit you over the head with a frying pan is it less serious than showing you Mr. Happy?
quote:
She was given a two year suspended sentence and can’t teach for two years. She will not have to register as a sex offender.
In other words...Nothing. Sub teachers make what? 40 bucks a day? She can make more at Starbucks. Then she can return to teaching.
Would your judgment have been different if she wasn't such an ugly woman?
This post was edited on 7/27/17 at 2:22 pm
12
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:22 pm to Zach
quote:
A sub teacher did a cartwheel with a skirt and no underwear (the kids saw her pussy)
Pics?
ETA: NEVERMIND after clicking the link!
This post was edited on 7/27/17 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:23 pm to Zach
Hitting someone over the head with a frying pan would be aggravated assault and would be a felony.
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:24 pm to Zach
At least traditionally, assault was putting someone in apprehension of an offensive touching, i.e., a battery. In other words, merely threatening conduct. Hitting you with a frying pan would be a battery and would involve a weapon so could also be aggravated battery. I don't know which state you're referencing and a little fuzzy on criminal law but this post is based on general principles applicable to criminal law.
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:24 pm to Zach
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/27/17 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:25 pm to Zach
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:26 pm to N.O. via West-Cal
quote:
assault was putting someone in apprehension of an offensive touching
She didn't touch anyone.
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:26 pm to Remulan
quote:
Hitting someone over the head with a frying pan would be aggravated assault and would be a felony.
It would also be battery. All batteries are assaults, but not all assaults are batteries. An assault is something that causes fear or harm without necessarily touching. A battery is an unwanted touching. Therefore, swinging a frying pan and missing is assault. Swinging a frying pan and hitting is assault AND battery.
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:28 pm to WPBTiger
I'd rather be beat over the head with a frying pan than catch a glimpse of her vertical smirk.
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:30 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
Oh, come on, she's not in a happy place while getting her mug shot taken. But let it be a lesson to all women out there who go to work without panties... be sure to shave. 
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:31 pm to Zach
Assault doesn't require harmful or unwanted contact. That would be a battery. Assault is the attempt to commit a battery or placing another in reasonable apprehension of an imminent battery.
It is a misdemeanor and doesn't require filing as a sex offender...I would assume. It depends on the state I suppose.
It is a misdemeanor and doesn't require filing as a sex offender...I would assume. It depends on the state I suppose.
Posted on 7/27/17 at 2:31 pm to Zach
After seeing the picture, they should have offered the kids trauma counseling
Posted on 7/27/17 at 3:30 pm to Zach
quote:Minumum wage is 7.25 an hour, so if it pays minimum wage (doubtful) then they would only be working 5.5 hours. Here in Central Ohio, most school districts pay substitutes 90-95 per day.
In other words...Nothing. Sub teachers make what? 40 bucks a day?
Posted on 7/27/17 at 3:33 pm to Zach
If any kid saw her pussy, she should be charged with assault. The eyes and brain cannot recover from that.
Posted on 7/27/17 at 3:59 pm to Zach
Assault is a threat. Battery is unwanted touching. If i tell you in person I'm going to punch you in the head and it's possible I could, I've committed simple assault.
From that mugshot it appears she committed Ocular Assault on those students. That's a little used law dating back to 1912.
From that mugshot it appears she committed Ocular Assault on those students. That's a little used law dating back to 1912.
This post was edited on 7/27/17 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 7/27/17 at 4:02 pm to Jake88
quote:
Assault is a threat.
Do you realize how little bright line there is?
"Suzy, if you don't stop picking your nose, I'm going to call you a patooty head."
That is a threat.
Posted on 7/27/17 at 4:11 pm to Zach
Assault to the eyes....
Can't unsee that....
Can't unsee that....
Posted on 7/27/17 at 4:16 pm to Zach
nm
This post was edited on 7/27/17 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 7/27/17 at 6:09 pm to Zach
It is what it is. A threat to do bodily harm.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 11:06 am to Zach
"She didn't touch anyone"
Right. Therefore, "assault" and not "battery."
Right. Therefore, "assault" and not "battery."
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News