- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:40 am to Bamatab
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:41 am to ForeLSU
Fore, while we do appreciate young posing real facts as to Trumptard alternative facts, they will view his as part of the 'fake polls' that they will try to ignore.
Trumptards don't do well with real facts and real data
Trumptards don't do well with real facts and real data
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:41 am to LSURussian
at you for believing that the 9th had 80% of it's decisions reversed. Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:44 am to FalseProphet
quote:Not sure you understand how math works...
it only involves cases that the SCOTUS actually takes
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:48 am to Contra
They should be impeached.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:48 am to UHTiger
quote:
Fore, while we do appreciate young posing real facts as to Trumptard alternative facts, they will view his as part of the 'fake polls' that they will try to ignore.
well, everyone knows that scotus blog is a left-wing fake news site backed by Soros
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:49 am to FalseProphet
quote:
and why do you seem to know the result already?
Wow! Now THAT is some desperate projecting!
There is zero evidence in my first post that I have any opinion on what the SCOTUS will rule.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:53 am to JuiceTerry
You have some serious issues if you have to put a with almost everyone of your posts. No one thinks you are funny. Just stupid.
with almost everyone of your posts. No one thinks you are funny. Just stupid. 
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:53 am to Contra
Why do you think they are called the 9th Circus?
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:53 am to LSURussian
I forgot you don't like to address the substance of posts. Is the reversal rate relevant in these circumstances? If so, why, and what facts support your contention?
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:54 am to LSURussian
I was mocking your own post, you dunce.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:55 am to JuiceTerry
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:56 am to FalseProphet
quote:You don't think that court's reversal rate is relevant?
. Is the reversal rate relevant in these circumstances?
I know I'd be damn embarrassed if I knew my decisions which reached the SCOTUS were reversed at the rate the 9th's decisions are.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 9:01 am to FalseProphet
quote:
Is the reversal rate relevant in these circumstances
It's basically telling you how frequently, when this court is asked to weigh in on difficult questions, they get it wrong.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 9:15 am to Contra
It's just one of many reasons why our divided nation should be divided geopolitically. Let the Left Coast do it's thing while the Heartland carries on with American tradition.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 9:20 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
It's basically telling you how frequently, when this court is asked to weigh in on difficult questions, they get it wrong.
THIS.
The talking point, while it does have validity, that they only send a small percentage of cases to the SC and even though it is an 80% reversal it is marginal.
This assumes all cases are equal. They are not. Especially this case.
It's known and quite obvious which cases the SC will take and a tiered approach needs to be taken when looking at the "only 1%" of the cases that go to the SC of which 80% are overturned.
For the sake of simplicity, lets "assume" this case goes to the supreme court (which it will) and by definition fits the "1%". Which 80% of like cases get overturned. This fits that mold.
The mental gymnastics on this is totally missing the point that all cases are not created equal and is taking statistical validity and its most basic form when in reality more complex layers are needed to analyze.
This post was edited on 2/10/17 at 9:21 am
Posted on 2/10/17 at 9:25 am to BaylorTiger
quote:
Not sure you understand how math works...
There is an entire level of math called Statistics and Qualitative Analysis that people find more valuable than 2 + 2.
The mental gymnastics on this is abhorrent.
Cases, like the one we are discussing, have an 80% rejection rate. We are not talking about the 99% of cases that are not like this one. We are talking about the cases that match the characteristics of this one.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 10:10 am to FalseProphet
quote:
they are usually only taking them because they want to reverse them.
That's even more telling. Perhaps they are taking the Brennan philosophy of looking at rights even way beyond the "penumbras and emanations" thing. THey need to be slapped down in that case.
However, given yesterday's ruling, the state of Arizona would have a case in being able to enforce immigration law on its own....since states now have standing when it comes to immigration issues which heretofore was the purview of he federal government and the Executive Branch.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 10:13 am to BaylorTiger
quote:
Cases, like the one we are discussing, have an 80% rejection rate. We are not talking about the 99% of cases that are not like this one. We are talking about the cases that match the characteristics of this one.
How do you know that this is one of those ones that "match the characteristics" of the other reversals?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News