Started By
Message
locked post

Would the world be better off if Hillary had never existed?

Posted on 3/8/17 at 8:51 am
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45756 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 8:51 am
Bill wouldn't have had to get a BJ from Monica. He likely would have been a pretty decent guy without Hillary's evil influence. He wouldn't have hired Janet Reno and Waco wouldn't have happened. All that crap to indict and impeach him wouldn't have happened.

People dead now would be alive, both here and abroad. Likely Bush wouldn't have been elected and Iraq would still be governed by Hussein. ISIS wouldn't exist. Europe wouldn't be overrun with immigrant refugees. The war on drugs wouldn't have happened.

Barack likely wouldn't have even been president. Race relations would be much better. Far left libs would be found in coffee shops.

Seems to me, she's the singularity that has the world in the state it's in.
Posted by Sody Cracker
Distemper Ward
Member since May 2016
3409 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 8:57 am to
I'm certain her parents loathed their loins after she was born.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 8:58 am to
Actually...the guy who invented leaded gasoline was also responsible for inventing chlorofluorocarbons.

I think the world would have been better off without him.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 8:59 am to
About 30 people would still be alive.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21874 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 8:59 am to

DUH
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34909 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:01 am to
Would Light be better off if Dark didn't exist? Good v Evil?

Everything imaginable exists. And creates and extraordinary drama to keep our restless spirits entertained and moving up.

Hillary sucks. But she is cunningly efficient, and as such, a worthy challenge.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Would the world be better off if Hillary had never existed?


In a very real sense, we have this mess because of Hillary Rotten Clinton.

Clinton could have run along until 2015 or so and her vile influence be limited to the 1994 Crime Bill and a few other things.

With her maniacal pursuit of the presidency, she wrecked the Democratic Party and instead of the very reasonable Sen. Sanders, or Jim Webb or even Gov. O’Malley we have Trump for president. Now I like Mr. Trump very much at this point. But I don’t know if he can withstand, or if any person could withstand this avalanche of attack from the Deep State (anyone from the CIA is suspect) and its Media whores like CNN, the NYT and WaPo.



Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37327 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:02 am to
Without question
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45756 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:02 am to
quote:

About 30 people would still be alive.
How many have died in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Syria since Bush was elected? More than a million? Likely, Bush wouldn't have been elected.

Iran would still be checked by Iraq, too.
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12655 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:03 am to
Bill Clinton should have married. dolly kyle his high school girlfriend.
Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
3481 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:05 am to
quote:

About 30 people would still be alive.


Probably not. Bill's association with the CIA extends to Hillary and not the inverse. Those folks were dead with Hill-dog around or not.

Posted by roux
Tiger Territory
Member since Dec 2006
1590 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:06 am to
Hillary and Jamie Gorelick would be on my list of wishing they never existed.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:07 am to
quote:

the very reasonable Sen. Sanders



Jeebus you socialists...
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:11 am to
In my mind the biggest story of 2016 is that both major parties are completely in the toilet.

The Rethugs are in the toilet because their Base wanted them to strongly oppose LBGT, abortion, either sex bathrooms and so on. After decades of being ignored the Base finally caught on that the Rethugs had been playing them for fools. Hence the popularity of Trump over Cruz, Rubio, Bush and the others.

That is why I say that the Rethugs are in a wait and see mode. None of them can count on being reelected.

In re HR Clinton’s pernicious influence, since 2008 she wrecked the Democratic Party and made sure that no reasonable (like younger) other candidate could emerge. She was the place holder. It was her turn. So if we suppose that the Democratic party were not also savaged -as a party- the Dems might be moving now to a position of dominance. But no, she wrecked it. That might be a bigger consequence than her just ensuring the election of Donald Trump.



Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:14 am to
quote:

the very reasonable Sen. Sanders

Jeebus you socialists...


Let's set a baseline. You are a moron.

Pres. Sanders would fight for his causes but he would fight within a framework that we know. In that sense he was a reasonable candidate.

Whatever you want to say about Senator Sanders, he means well.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45756 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:16 am to
quote:


Whatever you want to say about Senator Sanders, he means well.
One could easily say the same about Trump.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Whatever you want to say about Senator Sanders, he means well.



Everyone "means well" to their own side/constituents.

In most sane peoples' view, Sanders is a raving socialist lunatic who spent a good deal of his life praising communism and communist rulers.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35632 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Seems to me, she's the singularity that has the world in the state it's in.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 9:52 am to
quote:

In most sane peoples' view, Sanders is a raving socialist lunatic who spent a good deal of his life praising communism and communist rulers.


I don't think I ever even heard of Sen. Sanders before last year.

Can you source all that?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112469 posts
Posted on 3/8/17 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Actually...the guy who invented leaded gasoline was also responsible for inventing chlorofluorocarbons.


OK, this implies that gasoline does not naturally contain lead. I've heard the argument that gas already has lead and that's why taking the lead out made unleaded more expensive than leaded back in the day.

But my dad, who worked rigs for 40 years, told me that when oil goes to the refinery it does not contain lead. Lead is added.

Me: 'So, if they don't add it then they don't have to remove it. So why is unleaded more expensive.'
Dad: 'Beats the hell out of me.'
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram