Started By
Message

re: woah woah woah CNN interviews undocumented Hampshire College student

Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:49 am to
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:49 am to
quote:

Does that mean that we have to condone or encourage behaviors that are not benificial to a society as a whole?
Dramatic irony
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54209 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:51 am to
quote:

It's full of people who think that gratuitously adding "personal responsibility"


You really don't get it do you? The only personal responsibility evident pertaining to this thread is your and my responsibility to take care of them with our tax money. Any person with a brain should be just a little upset with that.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21121 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:53 am to
quote:

That's just it, I don't give a damn about the kids situation. Even if he is here through no fault of his own, he is now flaunting that in front of everyone and getting free ride after free ride.


Not surprising. You'd rather him be quiet about it? What "free ride" is he getting? Because he is in college? That angers you?

Some people are completely unreasonable. You are one of them, at least on this. This kid might only know America. What do you want him to do?
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21121 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:57 am to
quote:

You really don't get it do you? The only personal responsibility evident pertaining to this thread is your and my responsibility to take care of them with our tax money. Any person with a brain should be just a little upset with that


Why do we have to take care of them if they are on a path to legalized status and they are given a work permit? Wouldn't they be adding to the tax base? Study after study has shown that when they are able to work, immigrants are a net gain to the economy. When they can't, they are a drain.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Any person with a brain should be just a little upset with that.
Yet somehow, I don't melt.

Of the following three options:
1. humane deportation
2. amnesty
3. looking the other way
(4. a combination of the three above),

one of them costs us the least. That's the one I favor. frick your feelings.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54209 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:15 am to
quote:

frick your feelings.


So mature. It ain't my feelings getting fricked, it's every taxpayer's pocketbook getting fricked. Would you like to pay my unfair share to take care of these people? I'd be more than willing to keep my feelings to myself if you would.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:17 am to
quote:

So mature.
If you voted for Trump or Clinton, you don't get to judge people's maturity level. Sorry. You shoehorned your feelings into the discussion, and they don't matter, so frick your feelings. You're still discussing them now when I plainly told you that I favor the action that will be least costly to us.
This post was edited on 11/30/16 at 8:18 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54209 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:18 am to
quote:

If you voted for Trump or Clinton, you don't get to judge people's maturity level.


And you do because why?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72080 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:21 am to
quote:

You're still discussing them now when I plainly told you that I favor the action that will be least costly to us.
How do you know that deportation of these individuals who are using publicly funded resources wouldn't cost us less?
This post was edited on 11/30/16 at 8:22 am
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:24 am to
quote:

And you do because why?

I didn't judge anyone's maturity level. You did, because melt.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:26 am to
quote:

How do you know that deportation of these individuals who are using publicly funded resources wouldn't cost us less?

I don't.

What I do know is that the GOP would push harder on this issue if it weren't so politically costly to them.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73493 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:32 am to
He needs go. Period.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21121 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:33 am to
quote:

The plan set forth above rewards illegal conduct. If you think that's sets a great precedent, then you are more liberal than I believe. We have allowed this country to become a cesspool of undesirables from other countries. I am not talking about the poor, I am talking about the criminals and clinically insane. It is people like you who want to continue to accept these criminals and their children who truly lack the ability to reason.


This is a pile of Bull. Crap.

1. I'm a conservative. Have been for years. And, it is by choice and study.
2. This does not reward illegal behavior. It allows those who were brought here without their consent an avenue to GET RIGHT with the law. It actually creates a way for legal behavior to commence.
3. I am totally against illegal immigration, am for a secure border, and have no problem with a 100 foot high wall. Knock yourself out.
4. I believe in the rule of law. But, having a blanket law that allows for no consideration for those brought here without their consent is not a just law. It punishes the victim.
5. Make them work for it. Don't give them a thing. Make them spend a couple of years in civil service or military service. Make them take citizenship classes, pay fines, prove they are working or are in school, do thousands of hours of community service, make it take 10 years. If at any point they don't want to fulfill the path laid out, deport them. The choice is there's. But, give them an opportunity. They are in a different class than those who just willingly flaunted our law. They were kids.
6. Yes, deport all the undesirables, criminals, those who won't work, and those who want to leech off the system. Deport those who won't come forward and get on a pathway within the allowed time period. This was Ben Carson's plan during the primaries.

This plan would benefit EVERYONE. Now that border security will be guaranteed, the only reason we could not adopt this is stubbornness.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Sure we have a free society and that is good. Does that mean that we have to condone or encourage behaviors that are not benificial to a society as a whole?


I think we could learn to be more tolerant and comfortable with things that mean a lot to some people, especially when it doesn't really affect your life
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28895 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:34 am to
quote:

How do you know that deportation of these individuals who are using publicly funded resources wouldn't cost us less?



I don't understand how people getting free use of roads, tax subsidized hospitals, police and fire departments, etc. is a good thing.

I understand the angst ballcaster has. Sincerely. But continuing to have open borders with allowing a welfare state will. It work down the road.

I love immigrants. The more the merrier.

Make the process easier for people getting here and find a way to get current illegals to either self deport (don't laugh, I think some here for less than honest purposes will leave on their own volition) or make it easy for them to come out, declare themselves and get the ball rolling.

I do feel for families in this situation. I do. But we don't go to a 3 year old son of a convict and say "you know what, it's not fair that your parents' actions affect you as a child, so your mommy doesn't have to go to jail."

Thinking of the children is important, but we're not in a vacuum and actions have consequences.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20271 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:40 am to
quote:

A "pathway" would require them to apply, pay fees and fines, pay back taxes (if there are any), prove you are in school or working, and would take a decade or more.


None of this is possible unless the wall was built beforehand. Also, I would support a path to legalization (after the wall was built) for people who crossed illegally but no citizenship for those people(no voting). Citizenship is the price they pay for breaking the law and expecting a shortcut. If citizenry is desired, go through it the legal way and start over to do it properly.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21121 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:40 am to
quote:

So mature. It ain't my feelings getting fricked, it's every taxpayer's pocketbook getting fricked. Would you like to pay my unfair share to take care of these people? I'd be more than willing to keep my feelings to myself if you would.



Again, a pathway to earned legalized status IS NOT taking care of these people. They have to work and pay taxes and fines. They have to contribute - the whole time. They don't just get on welfare and sit around.

If you care about the law, THE LAW says that if they are here, they have to be educated in public schools. The LAW also says that they are entitled to due process. If a child was brought here at 3 years old and is now 15 or 18, they cannot just be deported without due process. The inmigration courts have a MASSIVE backlog because there isn't funding from Congress to expand them. Deporting all of the illegals will cost $400-600 Billion. Who is going to pay for that? You! Creating a pathway to legalized status is actually a NET GAIN for the economy and will increase the tax base.

Your solution actually hurts you and everyone else.

Secure the border. Enforce immigration law. But, recognize that we have a problem that was created over the past 30 years that has to be solved in another way beyond deportation.

It is like saying that the only way to deal with a foreign dispute with another country is through bombing them. Bomb everyone! That is just stupid and becomes counterproductive. That is what is going on here.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21121 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:44 am to
quote:

I understand the angst ballcaster has. Sincerely. But continuing to have open borders with allowing a welfare state will. It work down the road.


Who is calling for "open borders"?

Trump is president. He is going to completely seal the borders. So, we should be able to do something for those brought here as children - a rigorous process that allows them a way to get right with the law and to contribute to society.

Why would we not? Why would we seal the borders and then forcibly deport a 20 year old who was brought here when he was 3 and who wants to work and contribute and take care of himself? Who does that benefit? How is that just?
Posted by 20MuleTeam
West Hartford
Member since Sep 2012
3862 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:47 am to
You're an intellectual lightweight and one of the usable fools Stalin warned about. How does it feel?
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21121 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:49 am to
quote:

None of this is possible unless the wall was built beforehand. Also, I would support a path to legalization (after the wall was built) for people who crossed illegally but no citizenship for those people(no voting). Citizenship is the price they pay for breaking the law and expecting a shortcut. If citizenry is desired, go through it the legal way and start over to do it properly.


Fine. Build the wall. I don't care.

As for voting, after the kid goes through the 10 year process, earns legalized status, fights to stay, takes citizenship classes, does community service, pays fines, etc, I'd rather have him voting than 90% of natural born citizens. He'll value it more and be far more informed.

You're talking about keeping this person as a permanent second-class resident his whole life because of what was done TO him as a child. It makes no moral or legal sense.

He should not just be granted the right to vote. But, after going through the 10 year process to earn legalized status, why could he not then apply for and go through the process for citizenship like other legal residents are allowed to do? At that point, would he not have regained an equal footing?

We aren't talking about giving anything away. We are talking about giving these kids a way to get right and contribute.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram