- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will all those gun sales after Sandy Hook, crime rates should rise, right?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:04 am to mmcgrath
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:04 am to mmcgrath
quote:keeping drunks from behind steering wheels will save tens of thousands of lives....
Keeping them in the hands of responsible gun owners' hands is
ignition breathalyzers for everyone!
1
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:04 am to Wolfhound45
quote:Gun registrations would help keep them legal. Give owners quick ways to sell responsible. Subsidize any related costs if necessary to make sure that private sales are handled as tightly as commercial sales.
How? Legal guns are not the issue.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:05 am to wickowick
I mean there is no way a criminal is going to break the law to obtain a firearm right?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:05 am to lsuroadie
quote:Cars are registered. Why not guns?
keeping drunks from behind steering wheels will save tens of thousands of lives..
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:06 am to Janky
quote:Well the "legal" firearm owner will have to come up with the reason why he no longer has possession of the gun.
I mean there is no way a criminal is going to break the law to obtain a firearm right?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:07 am to mmcgrath
quote:and we all know drunks ONLY drive registered vehicles.
Cars are registered
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:07 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Cars are registered. Why not guns?
One is a Constitutionally protected right. Oh, and not like HC, a real, enumerated one.
Owning a car is not. Oh and btw, you can own an unregistered vehicle. It must be registered to drive on public roads.
Double fail in one analogy, you progtards have been stepping up your game!
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:09 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Cars are registered. Why not guns?
how about we require you to register with the Feds to be able to post on the internet.
or write a blog.
or send an email.
or write a book.
something no one has ever answered for me on TD's
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:10 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Gun registrations would help keep them legal.
Gun registration leads to gun confiscation. This is a fact.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:13 am to wickowick
quote:Here we go with the "They are taking our guns" meme again.
Gun registration leads to gun confiscation. This is a fact.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:13 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Give owners quick ways to sell responsible.
If this is the case, why not have a 800 number for sellers to call, if the seller chooses. Lets them do a paperless background check with only the buyer's driver's licence info, similar to a 4473 form. Approve or deny and no record... The seller can write down a confirmation number for future needs.
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 10:18 am
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:17 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
have something by the door inside that can be used as a weapon, like a huge candlestick holder.
Here you go, person coming in... here's an extra weapon you can use!
fricking retards.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:23 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Gun homicides have been going down since the Brady Bill was passed. Go figure.
Actually they went down before that but don't let reality get in the way of your facts. You might want to explain why all those supposed felons denied were practically never arrested for attempting to purchase a firearm.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:26 am to Kino74
quote:I am sure it was a concession from when the law was written. Not sure if there is a uniform reason given when you are denied and someone may simply be ignorant of whatever reason caused the denial.
Actually they went down before that but don't let reality get in the way of your facts. You might want to explain why all those supposed felons denied were practically never arrested for attempting to purchase a firearm.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:29 am to wickowick
quote:Something like that would make sense. Maybe even just a website or app you can use. Basically the seller would login in, identify the gun being sold, and enter the buyer's account number. The buyer then has 24 hours to log in and accept the transaction. When receipt is received by the seller, the gun and money can change hands.
If this is the case, why not have a 800 number for sellers to call, if the seller chooses. Lets them do a paperless background check with only the buyer's driver's licence info, similar to a 4473 form. Approve or deny and no record... The seller can write down a confirmation number for future needs.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:30 am to mmcgrath
That's a bunch of bs. Do you even know the gun laws? Apparently not.
Direct at mmgrath.
Direct at mmgrath.
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 10:31 am
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:32 am to mmcgrath
quote:
identify the gun being sold
No, only ok that the person purchasing the gun is legal. No serial numbers...
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:33 am to lsuroadie
quote:
how about we require you to register with the Feds to be able to post on the internet.
or write a blog.
or send an email.
or write a book.
something no one has ever answered for me on TD's
I'm waiting.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:34 am to Kino74
quote:I am not well versed in background checks. Sue me. I know up to a certain number of years ago (10?) they weren't so uniform but it seems like they are coming together. It is still up to individual state agencies to submit the relative data as far as I understand it. Not sure what the specifics have to do with the discussion though.
That's a bunch of bs. Do you even know the gun laws? Apparently not.
Direct at mmgrath.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:37 am to lsuroadie
quote:Blogs can't fall into the wrong hands and be used to commit a homicide. Gun regulations have already been determined by the Supreme Court as NOT being a violation of the 2nd, so there's that as well.
I'm waiting.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News