- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why does Fox bring Mark Fuhrman on every time there is Police scandal?
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:36 am to PoundFoolish
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:36 am to PoundFoolish
Huh? I am talking about ratings. It is pretty obvious what crowd Fox is shooting for with some of these decisions.
1
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:36 am to More&Les
He had to as they would have been able to ask about the recordings
You invoke the 5th you can't selectively answer questions.
Plus his book about the Moxley murder basically is considered groundbreaking
You invoke the 5th you can't selectively answer questions.
Plus his book about the Moxley murder basically is considered groundbreaking
This post was edited on 2/26/17 at 11:38 am
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:37 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I know all of that. My comment was that his detective work was good
quote:
Later (with the jury absent), when asked under oath whether he had planted or manufactured evidence in the case, Fuhrman invoked his Fifth Amendment right and declined to answer. According to the defense, this raised the possibility that Fuhrman had planted key evidence as part of a racially motivated plot against Simpson. The audiotape proving that Fuhrman perjured himself—thereby undermining the credibility of the prosecution—has been cited as one reason why Simpson was acquitted.
I see what you mean, great detective work...
This post was edited on 2/26/17 at 11:38 am
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:39 am to _Hurricane_
I never understood that due to his saying the n word, the jury felt there was reasonable doubt. It is Alabama leprechaun level stupidity.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:41 am to Tigerdev
quote:
It is pretty obvious what crowd Fox is shooting for with some of these decisions.
Maybe a crowd that prefers truth? Fuhrman may be a racist, but at least he's honest and, like another poster said, he was the only one with more than a pulse in the OJ case.
This post was edited on 2/26/17 at 11:46 am
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:42 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
center of the biggest police scandal of all time
what police scandal you talking about??
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:42 am to More&Les
quote:
He's an expert douche bag. He's the fuging poster child for racist cops targeting blacks.
oh - never mind - I don't need anything else from you.
Go back to your sewer.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:43 am to ChineseBandit58
I'd say the two NYC detectives that were hit men for the mob is a way bigger scandal, but that's just me.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:45 am to PoundFoolish
quote:
Fuhrman may be a racist, but at least he's honest.
quote:
One year after his disputed testimony about racial slurs helped a jury acquit O.J. Simpson, retired police Detective Mark Fuhrman was indicted Wednesday on charges that he committed perjury when he said he hadn't uttered a racial epithet in the previous decade.
Now that I see your definition of honesty(which apparently includes law enforcement officers who perjure themselves under oath), and the degree to which you will defend the shittiest of racists...I am happy I at least understand your deal.
Either that or you were mistaken and ignorant of his history and can admit that here clearly and without any qualifier.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:46 am to Tigerdev
He perjured himself about racist comments not anything about the case
Apples and grapes
Being a racist spewing fool and doing good honest police work aren't the same
Apples and grapes
Being a racist spewing fool and doing good honest police work aren't the same
This post was edited on 2/26/17 at 11:48 am
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:47 am to sms151t
quote:PoundFoolish said "at least he is honest". He perjured himself under oath as a law enforcement officer. I think that makes him dishonest. He needs to eat it on this one. No White knighting. Thanks.
He perjured himself about being a racist not anything about the case
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:48 am to More&Les
Also, can someone explain how the bloody sock that was NOT in the crime scene photos got stained in the identical spot top and bottom with a chemical found in blood storage containers if it was being worn by the killer and then left behind in rush to leave town...?
I'm sure this wasn't Fuhrman, honest upright man that he is but maybe some other LAPD officer that recorded 13 hours of confessions of planting evidence to frame black men because, well they were n!&&@$...?
I'm sure this wasn't Fuhrman, honest upright man that he is but maybe some other LAPD officer that recorded 13 hours of confessions of planting evidence to frame black men because, well they were n!&&@$...?
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:51 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I know all of that. My comment was that his detective work was good. They hung him on character. He said in earlier testimony that he never said the n word, then they brought out the tape. He pled the 5th so he wouldn't perjur himself on the n word testimony, and the defense (knowing he was pleading the 5th) asked about the planted evidence.
Again - the only truly competent part of the OJ case.
For any adult to swear they had never uttered the n-word in their lives would be a travesty. Even the most die-hard SJW's eternally weeping about equality and civil rights have uttered the word.
The recording they had was about a movie script he was working on with screenwriter - the language used was typical of the language involved at the time with police and gangs.
That is only a 'gotcha' in some alternate universe populated by unicorns.
quote:
It was a set up at the trial
[quote]He pled the 5th so he wouldn't perjur himself on the n word testimony, and the defense (knowing he was pleading the 5th) asked about the planted evidence. [/quote
True dat - once you plead the fifth, the questioning should stop - because you then have to plead the 5th to every other question or give up the protection. It was a gimmick - and everyone knows it - but that doesn't stop the dishonest DIMprogs from continuing the false narrative.
False narratives is all the DEM party now has. They have not one real reason to exist in their present ideological bent.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:54 am to sms151t
quote:
I'd say the two NYC detectives that were hit men for the mob is a way bigger scandal, but that's just me.
Was Furhman involved with that?
My statement was about Furhman being part of the 'biggest police scandal of all time.' Referring to his involvement with the OJ case.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 11:57 am to _Hurricane_
I think he's an excellent representative of conservatism in America and thus a perfect choice for Fox News
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:00 pm to ChineseBandit58
It was so much more than the n-word buddy and he specifically pled the 5th as to manufacturing evidence, which there was a strong likelihood some had occurred in this case.
Mark Fuhrman ruined any chance the prosecution had to convict OJ.
Suite ain't got nothing to do with SJWness, I'm a trump train bartender and long time Fox News fan, I cringe everytime I see MF because I know what a pos he is and it gives the other side gun powder for their bullshite all cops/fox/white people are racists gun...
Mark Fuhrman ruined any chance the prosecution had to convict OJ.
Suite ain't got nothing to do with SJWness, I'm a trump train bartender and long time Fox News fan, I cringe everytime I see MF because I know what a pos he is and it gives the other side gun powder for their bullshite all cops/fox/white people are racists gun...
This post was edited on 2/26/17 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:01 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
PoundFoolish said "at least he is honest". He perjured himself under oath as a law enforcement officer. I think that makes him dishonest. He needs to eat it on this one. No White knighting. Thanks.
Sorry - honesty is a commonly accepted quality. Furhman is more honest than any person on the OJ defense team. On that you will have to agree or else lose all credibility.
Now, yes he gave a false answer under oath - but it was to a question that had absolutely no relevance to the case. That question should have never been allowed.
If only people who have never uttered the n-word are to be considered non-racist, then there wouldn't have been a dozen people over the age of 18 alive in the 70s. If you are going to assert that the utterance of one word decades earlier would be of value in a murder case then you are knowingly lying.
Just be honest - OJ murdered his wife and the other guy. The jury let him off for no rational reason. You know that -- everyone knows that.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:02 pm to ChineseBandit58
But the OJ case wasn't the biggest police scandal of all time
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:04 pm to More&Les
quote:
pecifically pled the 5th as to manufacturing evidence
bullshite
you are more ignorant than you are stupid.
begone.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:12 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
bull shite
you are more ignorant than you are stupid.
begone.
quote:
Uelmen asked Fuhrman if his testimony at the preliminary hearing had been truthful, whether or not he had ever falsified a police report, and if he had planted evidence in the Simpson case. Fuhrman's response to all three questions was: "I wish to assert my 5th Amendment privilege." Here's the video footage:
My bad I must have been thinking of some other racist pos in a different trial of the century...
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News