Started By
Message

re: Why do gays choose to be gay?

Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26125 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:36 pm to
It's mostly innate, and not a voluntary choice, to be attracted in a samesex context.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
45989 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

"Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error."


Was truth over 2,000 years ago and is true today. I guess truth is indeed timeless,
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
45989 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

quote: Now that it is a scientific fact that gays are not "born that way", what makes a dude decide to lust after a sweaty hairy man butt? *IF* it's not a biological cause, but rather environmental, that does not automatically mean it is a choice. (I'm talking about people who are legitimately attracted to only members of the same sex, not people who are "gay" for attention.) I am gay. To the best of my knowledge, I have always been gay. There was never a time in my life when I woke up one day and, entirely through my own volition, decided to turn off my attraction for women and turn it on for men. I have never been attracted to females, so there was never a choice on my part. (And no, I was not molested by anyone growing up, and yes my father and my mother were both active equally in my life and I played sports like baseball, football, etc.) I'd venture to guess you never decided one day to like females over males -- it's just something inherent to you and who you are. Toddy doesn't speak for, or act like all of us do. I'm pretty sure you'd see me in everyday life and not even know I was gay.



I can say, folks with your attitude and approach to life are not a problem with society.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
45989 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Can you tell me the moment in your life you chose to like women? If someone held a gun to your head right now and forced you to change your attraction from women to men, could you? You're confusing someone's ability to choose whether or not he/she engages in behavior with someone's ability to control why they like a behavior. I can't tell you why I like pasta, I just do. But I have a choice as to whether or not I eat pasta, not to stop liking it.


From my earliest memories, I always wanted to walk the little girl home from kindergarten in the short dress with the pink ribbon in her hair .
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21856 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Gotta love people bringing religion in to try to dictate how people live their lives. That damn book has held society back so much.


Please tell me how that "damn book" has held society back?

Tell me how teachings such as love thy neighbor as thyself have held society back?
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

It's only a matter of time until they go away.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:31 pm to
quote:


Please tell me how that "damn book" has held society back?

Tell me how teachings such as love thy neighbor as thyself have held society back?



Well, for one, it stops people from doing simply whatever they want with absolutely no consequences whatsoever insofar as guilt goes. So there's that.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41648 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

oh of course. mr religion is back choosing whatever passages fit in with his inherent prejudice.
Since my "inherent prejudice" is based on the Bible, I'm going to continue quoting scripture (appropriately, might I add) that supports my Biblical worldview.

quote:

i can quote romans and the new testament too. how do these things fit in with the border wall you want to build?
Border wall? That's random when talking about gays, but so be it.

Your first mistake is that you don't understand the distinction of roles that the civil magistrate has vs. the laity or civilian population. The Bible says that the government has the authority to take lives in the name of justice (Rom. 13:4). Civilians do not have such an authority but are instead told not to repay evil for evil (1 Peter 3:9). Likewise, there are principles that are commanded to individuals that do not apply (as a command) to the governments. Commands for charity to Christians is not a command for the government to force people to give them money to redistribute it (that isn't charity any longer).

Secondly, a border wall is a means to protect the people of the country who erects it. That is a good thing and something the government is responsible for. Even Jerusalem had walls. Walls are one thing but doors are another. The government still has an immigration policy that lets thousands of people in each year (and that will continue, wall or no wall), whether they are refugees or just good people wanting to make a better life here. If we had no limit on who could come in at a given time, eventually this country would be overwhelmed by those who cannot support it and the citizens here would suffer from it (as we do already due to illegal immigration). There needs to be a balance between taking in foreigners who need help and making sure we are not neglecting our citizens.

Now, I'm going to make some brief comments about each of those verses you provided:

Romans 12:13
Where do you see "strangers" there? The verse only speaks to hospitality and it's within the context of helping needing Christians. Even so, this country let's in nearly a million people a year, and that's not including the people who come here for a short stay and then take off again. That's a lot of hospitality!

Matthew 5:10-11
persecuted...for righteousness' sake. Can't leave that out. It's talking about people who are persecuted for Christ's sake (for being Christians). Not sure how that applies to a border wall.

Matthew 25:31-46
This verse is talking about people (not nations) taking care of the poor and needy. You can see that in verses 32 and 33 when Jesus says that the King will separate the sheep from the goats from among the nations. You think Jesus is talking exclusively about government here?

Regardless of that misuse of the text, we as a nation take in over a million legal immigrants a year, and they aren't all starving and needy. Most just want a better place to live.

Luke 3:11
Again, not sure what this has to do with a border wall. This was a command to help those in need as people after the Kingdom of God (we call them "Christians"). A border wall doesn't change that. What it helps prevent is having your cloak stolen so that you don't have one, yourself.

Luke 4:16-21
This was Jesus reading from the scroll of Isaiah to show the people that He was the promised Messiah that was foretold. Not sure how this applies to the border wall considering the spiritual significance of those statements (the gospel accomplished all of those things, spiritually). Jesus' kingdom wasn't of this earth, after all.

Corinthians II 8:13-15
This was a comment to a particular church body that they should emulate another church body by taking care of each other as best as they are able to do for the sake of Jesus. Paul even states in verse eight: "I say this not as a command, but to prove by the earnestness of others that your love also is genuine." It's good for those who have extra to help those who don't, but the Christian ethic is to tithe to God first, then help your family, then help the Church, then help those outside the Church. The wall does nothing to negate this.

Ephesians 2:11-22
Um, this is talking about spiritual aliens and strangers and spiritual citizens. Paul is talking to Gentiles, who were not part of the covenant community of Israel. They didn't have the Prophets, Moses, the covenants with Abraham and the like, and they didn't have the promised Messiah foretold to them. All told, they didn't have the blessings of God. Christ's death removed that separation of Jew and Gentile and now the Gentiles who were not part of the community of God are welcomed in. The wall doesn't do anything to impact this.

Hebrews 11
Abraham obeyed God and was being led to the land God promised him. He was being praised for his faith, not his travel. Again, not sure how this applies since God isn't commanding anyone to travel to the US.

Hebrews 13:1-2
Again, showing hospitality is a good thing, but hospitality was always a temporary thing. No one was being told to take in everyone off the street and provide for all of their needs for the rest of their lives. Hospitality was taking in someone who was cold and hungry, giving them a blanket and some food, and sending them on their way. Definitely not what's going on in our country, yet we still take in millions of people wanting to come here.

James 2:5
Let's finish that quote, too: "has not God chosen those who are poor in the world... to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to those who love him?" He's talking about not giving favor to rich Christians over poor ones. The whole section is about not showing partiality to others who are in Christ but to treat them all with love and honor. This doesn't apply to the wall or immigration at all.

James 2:14-17
Again, this is talking to Christians who claim to have faith but then neglect to obey the law of God. He goes on to say, "You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works", which is to say that the good works are to flow from faith and that faith is proven by works. He's speaking to Christians, not to government bodies. The government of the US doesn't have faith that it can prove with its works. However, we as a country still provide for millions of people who come here for help or to make their lives better. We do it through legal immigration.

1 John 3:18
Yes, Christians are supposed to love one another by helping those in need when possible. We are doing that as a country already and a wall won't change that.

John 4:7-21
As with the previous verse, Christians are commanded to love one another just as Christ loved us and died for us. This is a command to Christians as individuals and more holistically as a Church body. This isn't a command to governments to allow anyone and everyone to come across its borders without question.


Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79120 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

its a plague on humanity that stomps the brakes on human progress. its depressing to even think about where we might be today if not for their endless wars on science.



I like how imbeciles just assume that absent religion (which has influenced, funded and otherwise driven political, social and scientific progress as much as any other entity or concept), we'd still have all the good things religion sparked, with none of the bad.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52925 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:33 pm to
Satan tells them to be gay
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21856 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Do you like brussel sprouts? If so, is there something wrong with you since others don't like them? If not, is it due to the way they taste or it it purely a choice because you don't like little green round things?


I certainly wouldn't want them shoved up my arse!
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21856 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Ah, so that's why heterosexual couples always have heterosexual children, right? By all accounts, "environmental" in this application probably means hormones in utero, not an overbearing mother or being around other gay people. You don't catch it lol.


Homo couples don't have children. Not without intervention anyway since you can't have a kid while riding the Hershey highway.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21856 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Well, for one, it stops people from doing simply whatever they want with absolutely no consequences whatsoever insofar as guilt goes. So there's that.


No it doesn't.

Even a societal death penalty doesn't stop people from committing murder.
Posted by KingwoodLsuFan
Member since Aug 2008
11447 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 3:04 pm to
quote:


Please tell me how that "damn book" has held society back?

Tell me how teachings such as love thy neighbor as thyself have held society back?

Last time I checked there are plenty of non christians and atheists who know not to kill, and to get along with people.These are basic fundamental components to maintain a functioning society. People didn't have to learn these "teachings" from the bible.
People and politicians voting on issues based purely on religious views are cancerous to growth. It's just madness to think people still believe the nonsense story of Adam and Eve over evolution.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71153 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

The burden of proof is always on the claimant. No one has to prove a negative.


So you don't claim it's a choice.

That's good.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41648 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 3:09 pm to
The Bible says that God's law (moral law / 10 commandments) is written on the hearts of all mankind. It expresses itself in what is called the conscience. Christians use this as an evidence for the existence of God.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71153 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

I like how imbeciles just assume that absent religion (which has influenced, funded and otherwise driven political, social and scientific progress as much as any other entity or concept), we'd still have all the good things religion sparked, with none of the bad.


There's no way of knowing where we'd be without religion. What we do know is all the fricked up things that have been done solely because of one religion or another.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71153 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

It expresses itself in what is called the conscience.


This nonsense is only perpetuated because we don't full understand it. Eventually, like all the other ignorant mythology surrounding religion, this will likely go away.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79120 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

There's no way of knowing where we'd be without religion. What we do know is all the fricked up things that have been done solely because of one religion or another.



And we also know that religion is a huge driving force, perhaps the most predominate driving force, in almost everything we find valuable (art, education, humanitarianism, architecture, social mores and codes, politics, historical recordkeeping, etc.).
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
24958 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Homo couples don't have children. Not without intervention anyway since you can't have a kid while riding the Hershey highway.


A lot of straight couples can't have children without medical help either. But that's not the point of the post I responded to.

The poster I responded to said homosexual couples were more likely, in her opinion, to produce homosexual kids. This is bogus, because we see heterosexual couples conceive, adopt, raise homosexual kids all the time.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram