Started By
Message

re: Why can't the president cancel a fund raiser in troubled times?

Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:00 am to
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80118 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Address the people


Which he did and again, Foxnews, the almighty of a ton of anti-obama people on here, said that his comments were appropriate at that time.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35386 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:07 am to
quote:

I didn't bring up the terrorist example, you did, as if that would be a valid reason to cancel a fund raiser. I pointed out to you that Baraaq has a history of prioritizing fund raisers over even terrorist attacks.
I said we aren't under a terrorist attack. That's present tense. Which is what the OP appeared to be referring to. But apparently the OP was referring to Benghazi, which from the sound of it you are surprised at as well.

With regards to Benghazi, yes he should have cancelled. As for any "history" outside of that where he inappropriately attended a fund raiser during "troubled times", I don't see it.

PS: My guess is that the OP was referring to yesterday's events but since the facts didn't bear out any agenda to follow, the OP is changing the subject.
Posted by roygu
Member since Jan 2004
11718 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:10 am to
He only has experience in two areas, Community Organizing and Fund Raising. He has to be somewhere. What else can he do. He can't play golf in the rain.
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
60585 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:10 am to
What was the address to the people maybe I missed it while I was sleeping
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80118 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:14 am to
quote:

What was the address to the people maybe I missed it while I was sleeping


Before his planned event, he made a statement about the situation and how we were trying to gain information as to what went on. He addressed the situation the best he could being that nobody actually knew what was going on.


Look, I am as anti-Obama has the next guy, but the need to blame Obama for ANYTHING he does is ridiculous.

Like I said in the thread yesterday... Had he cancelled this event and flow back to Washington, only to fly back for this event a few weeks later, the nuts on here would be yelling that he was wasting tax payer dollars in making a second trip.
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
60585 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:29 am to
That's not what I was really referencing, I think the issues should have been addressed to the nation and not as part of a blurb and prelude to a group of individuals and one state

I think the combined situations definitely called for something a little more substantial do to the parties involved and their relation to this country. It would be different if he were in another position but when you are potus you have to realize the world is watching and waiting on your every action and I think what they were seeing was a bit of indifference yesterday and it caused some dismay

I understand based on the info you can't condemn or convict anyone but when the country and the world are getting a little uneasy it's really just part of the job to act as a figurehead when you can't act with actions. Just inspire a little confidence

I also understand any address or speech he gives will be criticized but I guess I just prefer him being criticized for saying the wrong thing to the country and the world rather than criticized for saying nothing

A lot of this has to do with the continuing piling up of international relations blunders. People are waiting and ready and looking for the next thing to jump on because honestly some if his biggest gaffs have been these relations. It also doesn't help that the very things we see unfolding now were things directly addressed in the presidential debates so now everyone one has direct reference points to jump on and say SEE we told you so
This post was edited on 7/18/14 at 9:32 am
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:35 am to
quote:

A lot of this has to do with the continuing piling up of international relations blunders.

Like what?

I'll give you Syria and his red line.

I know people like to make fun of Russian sanctions, but what exactly should be done. I 've asked this question time and time again in these threads...nobody has an alternative. Do you want to invade Russia?

--eta--
I'll also give you the awesome Bo Berghdhal rose garden press conference. wtf
This post was edited on 7/18/14 at 9:37 am
Posted by Circle K Beggar
Somewhere in the lower 48
Member since Feb 2011
6154 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:35 am to
I'd rather him be fundraising. We all know he can't complete any real task without coming off as incompetent.

Keep fundraising and working on that short game! It's better for all of us.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80118 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:38 am to
quote:

I think the issues should have been addressed to the nation and not as part of a blurb and prelude to a group of individuals and one state


So you want him to ask networks for time that afternoon for a national address in regards to a situation that no Americans are involved in?

Then people would be bitching "frick the President, why did he interrupt my television schedule".

The man can't win and can do nothing right in a lot of peoples eyes.
Posted by Circle K Beggar
Somewhere in the lower 48
Member since Feb 2011
6154 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

The man can't win and can do nothing right in a lot of peoples eyes


Guys, stop picking on him!!!

Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:52 am to
poor barry, he has it so hard
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
60585 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:55 am to
Like I said any address he made would be criticized, any action he takes will be criticized that is also part of the job of the POTUS.

And no I'm wasn't suggesting a state of the union take over the television type address. Just an address simply devoted to the 2 issues at hand and nothing else. No transportation issues, no border issues, no energy issues. He will eventually do this I just think it should have been done earlier without conviction or condemnation on any party, just stern seriousness to quell the rising cries of indifference. Hell I'm not even asking him to cancel any fundraiser. These are international problems one involving a supposed ally and another involving a global military power with which we have at best bad relations with. It is an uneasy feeling for the country. Our footprints are all up in this whether we like it or not

I know Europe has to be shitting their pants right now as well
This post was edited on 7/18/14 at 9:57 am
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80118 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Like I said any address he made would be criticized, any action he takes will be criticized that is also part of the job of the POTUS.


You're about to get what you want. Scheduled news conference at 1130est.
Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:58 am to
and then off to martha's vineyard for a fund raiser @ 1pm
Posted by TG
Metairie
Member since Sep 2004
3057 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:40 am to
quote:

What troubled times? We aren't exactly at war or under attack from terrorists.


During the multi-hours Benghazi was under attack, he was absent and left for a fund raiser on the West Coast the next morning.

If you total up his fundraising, golf and vacation hours it might explain why he finds out about events through the press.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram