Started By
Message

re: Which nation that is currently not "first world/wealthy", will be in 20 years or so?

Posted on 10/18/17 at 12:59 pm to
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101652 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

quote:
Thank fricking God someone else in the world actually knows what the term "first world" refers to.

Really grinds my gears...


Its a pet peeve of mine. I don't get out of shape on grammar, but this should be common knowledge and most people use it incorrectly #firstworldproblems


I suppose one could argue that the term has sort of evolved since that original designation, no?
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

but south Korea, Japan, and west germany all become first world pretty quickly.


Because we carried them?

And you do realize any country that was in NATO or allied with the US is a 1st world country right? Second world was the Warsaw Pact/communists. Third World was all the neutral counties (third world now being synonymous with poor af)
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:02 pm to
Malaysia

Thailand

China



Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69354 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:05 pm to
Thailand is really poor outside of major tourist spots and cities.

In fact, the running theme is that the main thing holding back india, thailand, etc is grinding rural poverty.

Punjab in India is a sad sight to see.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28135 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

They have issues shitting in the correct place and their best leave for the US and UK.

They'll maintain a high GDP on population but remain per capita poor for a long time.


With a solid investment going forward,in that SUB-CONTINENT,the brightest of India might decide to stay home,and gamble on the future.
Location,location, location,can't be stressed enough..and India has untold,untapped natural resources as well.
Mahindra tractors were just the start.
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18137 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

I suppose one could argue that the term has sort of evolved since that original designation, no?



Sure. I believe it can. But to evolve its important to know the original, intended meaning.

Back to the original query, the country that has done less with more is Brazil.No reason they should not be a dominant power financially and militarily in South America.

Watch this from Prager and tell me it can't happen here: LINK
This post was edited on 10/18/17 at 1:10 pm
Posted by Anfield Road
Home of the Blue Turf
Member since May 2012
1942 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:07 pm to
Indonesia
Posted by AUFanInSoCal
Orange County
Member since Nov 2007
1616 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Indonesia

I would say Indonesia also.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76697 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:10 pm to
North Korea

The future world leader in nuclear power.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14513 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Indonesia


Not a bad guess.

I am thinking an eastern European nation. Maybe Poland?

Brazil is pretty poised to boom, but they can't get out of their own way.

Russia? I am not even sure that counts. Also see Brazil.

Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28135 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:15 pm to
Probably a banking empire,but will outgrow itself quickly and have untold problems.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69354 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:15 pm to
Much of Brazil is amazon rainforest that is inaccessible and not economically feasible to clear.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:16 pm to
Best guesses:
Mexico
Vietnam
Trinidad
Columbia
Argentina

Possibly Brazil too.
This post was edited on 10/18/17 at 1:18 pm
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:17 pm to
SE Asia as I was also referring...
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73547 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:18 pm to
Argentina
Trinidad
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112595 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Third World = developing countries


This is a change in rhetoric. In the 1960s 3rd world countries were called LDCs. Less Developed Countries. The term 'less' was deemed too stigmatizing. The word 'developing' is like the 400 pound woman who says she is getting fit because she used to weigh 410.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

and west germany
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:21 pm to
Yes, but they have had a boom in economic development of the rainforest since their policy in the 1960s similar to the US policy for claiming land during the frontier era.

Essentially anyone who wanted to could claim vacant land in Brazil as long as you could demonstrate economic use of the land.

This is where the "save the rainforest" campaign came from. They were proposing to build a transcontinental highway in the 80s that would have opened up the whole of North Brazil to economic development. The enviros managed to stop it.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112595 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Malaysia


Malaysia has come a long way in the last 50 years. Primarily because of the influence of successful Chinese and Indian immigrants over the backwards Malay Muslims.
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:23 pm to
I saw Poland...thats a good one along with probably Hungary.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram