Started By
Message

re: What does Russia get out of propping up the Assad regime?

Posted on 4/8/17 at 8:01 pm to
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10679 posts
Posted on 4/8/17 at 8:01 pm to
What?

quote:

After all, it was the Russian dominated Ukrainian government that was duly elected, but overthrown by the current government at the behest of the Bush and Obama administrations.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19401 posts
Posted on 4/8/17 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

There is no doubt on the part of our intelligence community that Assad did it, and 90% of the world's nations agree.


If we had evidence, we would have released it.

In this case we believe it's highly likely that the Syrians used chemical weapons, but we don't "know" that in any real way.

And our belief is colored by our biases. We're primed to believe that the Syrians would do such a thing, to the point where we won't even ask if that scenario makes any sense.

quote:

A Mediterranean port? Not much of a port, and it's not like it's adjacent to anything in Russia.


The Russians believe that we have torn the region apart, and created threats to their own security. So this an effort to stop that, to end regime change, and stabilize the Middle East.

They're also concerned about the international jihadi movement, especially given their own home grown troubles. They want to destroy ISIS for it metastasizes and threatens Russia directly. They don't want ISIS franchises popping up in Chechnya.

This is also a chance to show that they're a great power, it's a chance to bolster their international prestige.

It's a chance to tweak our noses as well. That's certainly part of it.

It's also a question of honor. They're standing by an ally.

The basing facilities are probably the least important reason for intervening.
This post was edited on 4/8/17 at 10:09 pm
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19401 posts
Posted on 4/8/17 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

1) The port of Taurus - a super important military installation


Before the war there were three (iirc) very rusty floating docks, and a barracks for 40 men. The setup was quite small and I'd be surprised if it could accommodate the larger Russian ships.

The joint intelligence facility in the Golan Heights was probably of more immediate utility.
Posted by coondaddy21
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
3222 posts
Posted on 4/8/17 at 11:23 pm to
I believe it has to do with a pipeline, oil and a considerable amount of revenue for Russia and its ability to strengthen its status in the world.
Posted by Boudin
Lafayette
Member since Oct 2006
10133 posts
Posted on 4/9/17 at 12:42 am to
quote:

There is a reason Crimea and eastern Ukraine are predominately Russian. Both were part of Russia for most of their existence. Chruchev gave both of them to Ukraine sometime in the 50s or maybe early 60s. Frankly, I have no sympathy whatsoever for Ukraine in this matter. After all, it was the Russian dominated Ukrainian government that was duly elected, but overthrown by the current government at the behest of the Bush and Obama administrations.
Why this post would get downvotes I have no idea.. Political Talk for you
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram