- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Were the Allies Too Soft on Germany Following WWII? (Trump Related)
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:06 am
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:06 am
Zachariah Goodman (apparently one of the directors for the American Council for Jewish Affairs) was on CNN earlier discussing Trump's deep-seated bias against Jews and he mentioned that it's par for the course as far as white men go since WWII. He believes we agreed honor the holocasut as long as it didn't interfere with our trade and military alliances with Germany.
It did make me think; Germany is the strongest power, economically and militarily in mainland Europe. They commuted unspeakable crimes against humanity. Were we too we easy on them after WWII?
Their atrocities were the most horrendous th world had seen in a while, and never from a civilized society.
Do you think we swept the true extent the Jews suffered 'under the rug', as he put it, in order to make sure American business and military interests were allowed to prosper?
It did make me think; Germany is the strongest power, economically and militarily in mainland Europe. They commuted unspeakable crimes against humanity. Were we too we easy on them after WWII?
Their atrocities were the most horrendous th world had seen in a while, and never from a civilized society.
Do you think we swept the true extent the Jews suffered 'under the rug', as he put it, in order to make sure American business and military interests were allowed to prosper?
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 6:07 am
20
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:10 am to Wes B
The Russians weren't too soft on them.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:11 am to Wes B
No. In fact most German people did not support the Nazi party. Right before Hitler took over as dictator, the Nazi party started to lose seats in Parliament. Why would we punish the citizens who just had their nation reduced to rumble?
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:11 am to Wes B
Too hard on them actually.
They are now so eaten up with white guilt that they might not survive.
We were too easy on the biggest mass genocide instigators like Mao, Stalin and Sanger.
They are now so eaten up with white guilt that they might not survive.
We were too easy on the biggest mass genocide instigators like Mao, Stalin and Sanger.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:51 am to Wes B
quote:
Zachariah Goodman (apparently one of the directors for the American Council for Jewish Affairs) was on CNN earlier discussing Trump's deep-seated bias against Jews
quote:
Trump's deep-seated bias against Jews
I got here and stopped reading.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 7:02 am to Wes B
Nvm
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 7:04 am
Posted on 2/25/17 at 7:18 am to Wes B
Premise of Trump being anti-Jew is retarded.
In answer to question, no. It is because of what the Allies did to Germany that they now welcome their Muslim overlords.
In answer to question, no. It is because of what the Allies did to Germany that they now welcome their Muslim overlords.
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 6:45 pm
Posted on 2/25/17 at 7:41 am to Wes B
quote:
Were we too we easy on them after WWII?
We split their country into pieces.
quote:
Their atrocities were the most horrendous th world had seen in a while, and never from a civilized society.
Our 'allies' the Soviets laugh at this. Look up the Holodomor.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 8:15 am to Al Bundy Bulldog
quote:
The Russians weren't too soft on them.
We were too soft on the Russians. A worn-out, soon to die FDR got taken to the cleaners at Yalta. I never understood why Churchill didn't step in and take more control of things.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 8:55 am to KCT
England was too weak by then. WW2 usher in the permanent rise of larger states such as USSR, USA, and later China. Euro countries couldn't compete and Churchill knew it.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 9:08 am to Wes B
We learned the hard way what happens when you castrate the krauts after the First World War. We also needed their support of the western half of Germany against the Soviets. The U.S. passed the Marshall Plan to help keep Europe from going totally commie.
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 9:10 am
Posted on 2/25/17 at 9:09 am to Wes B
quote:Well the allies were super hard on them in the Treaty of Versailles that ended the first a World War. That didn't work out so well.
Were the Allies Too Soft on Germany Following WWII? (Trump Related)
Posted on 2/25/17 at 9:12 am to Wes B
quote:
Were we too we easy on them after WWII?
Well, we hung a newspaper publisher. So that was a good thing.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 9:16 am to prplhze2000
quote:
England was too weak by then. WW2 usher in the permanent rise of larger states such as USSR, USA, and later China. Euro countries couldn't compete and Churchill knew it.
I see.
That was a shame, because FDR was a mess by then.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 9:24 am to prplhze2000
quote:
England was too weak by then. WW2 usher in the permanent rise of larger states such as USSR, USA, and later China. Euro countries couldn't compete and Churchill knew it.
Churchill was unique among the big 4 while the war crime trials were going on. He did not believe Nazi officers should be hung for following orders. He was afraid it would cause a slippery slope in future wars where the winners could hang the losers using it as a precedent.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 9:29 am to Zach
quote:Yep. He wasn't openly very vocal about this view, but many others were. Nuremberg was actually relatively controversial in many political circles. Perhaps even more importantly, there were serious legal objections raised. Among them, most of the criminal charges brought at trial were for violations of laws that, strictly speaking, didn't exist at the time they were being violated.
Churchill was unique among the big 4 while the war crime trials were going on. He did not believe Nazi officers should be hung for following orders. He was afraid it would cause a slippery slope in future wars where the winners could hang the losers using it as a precedent.
To have mercy on the German people and commit to allowing them to reindustrialize and reintegrate with the west, we had to go hard on the leaders. Kind of excise them like tumors for the betterment of the body.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:29 pm to Navytiger74
Ironically, Prussia and the allies were pretty damn easy on France after the Napoleonic wars.
Nuremberg and de'nazification were the price Germany paid. Allies weren't going to ignore Germany's internal politics again.
Allies should've invaded Germany at end of WWI instead of stopping in France. It would've prevented the whole Germany didn't lose and was backstabbed meme. Foreign troops on your soil tends to drive home the fact that you lost.
Nuremberg and de'nazification were the price Germany paid. Allies weren't going to ignore Germany's internal politics again.
Allies should've invaded Germany at end of WWI instead of stopping in France. It would've prevented the whole Germany didn't lose and was backstabbed meme. Foreign troops on your soil tends to drive home the fact that you lost.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:33 pm to Wes B
Of the warring powers, in terms of infrastructure and economics, Germany suffered more than any other nation - save Japan. Their government completely collapsed, their largest cities were in ruins, and millions of soldiers and civilians were dead. Compare that to World War I where the war hardly touched the German people.
Germany was totally defeated by May 1945. They had given everything and had suffered more than any nation can reasonably be expected to suffer. What else were the Allies supposed to do to them that hadn't been done already?
Germany was totally defeated by May 1945. They had given everything and had suffered more than any nation can reasonably be expected to suffer. What else were the Allies supposed to do to them that hadn't been done already?
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:37 pm to Wes B
Phil2012 has studied this issue extensively from highly respected sources that common folks aren't privy to. He wrote a poem about it while on the lam in Azerbaijan for 8 years. From his research, he was able to determine that Germany was actually the good guys in WW2, and if not for the Jew run media and film industry, we'd know that the wool was pulled over our eyes. We're noting but sheep, and no match for his intellect.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 6:46 pm to dpd901
Yup. You can find more proof in Pawns in the Game by Carr. Thoroughly researched and heavily documented book. Hitler didn't want to make war w England. Repeatedly tried to make peace w England but bankers pulled churchill's strings wnad wanted war. Hitler was actually trying to protect the common man from exploitation by bankers who profit from wars.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News