- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Weekly reminder: There is ZERO proof of collusion
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:00 pm to AUbused
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:00 pm to AUbused
quote:
By random Trump associate you mean son, son-in-law, and campaign manager
That's what I thought
no substantive responses to anything that I said, just a deflection on a topic that I already covered. Go crawl back in your hole you low information MSM loving libtard, and why don't you give this a read while you're at it: NSA leaker's forensic analysis of Guccifer 2.0 leak "Russian fingerprint" claim
You are not smart enough to differentiate between credible sources and media manipulation. It's fine. You've been duped. Now gtfo
2
Posted on 7/24/17 at 4:07 pm to LSUgrad08112
quote:
credible sources
By credible source, you mean the presidents own son?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 4:26 pm to BamaFan365
quote:
There is proof of collusion. It's just not being reported by the msm
Totally agree, so when will the Enemedia start exposing the Dims colluding with the MSM?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:08 pm to AUbused
quote:
By credible source, you mean the presidents own son?
Didn't I cover that already? You thought you were so smart earlier today when you were saying a bunch of dumb unsubstantiated shite, now you're just screeching autustically and banging out random sentences that sound clever to other uneducated idiots
it's so funny watching leftists melt down and resort to what you're doing when they realize that they don't know what the frick they're talking about in order to save face and keep the cognitive dissonance goingThis post was edited on 7/24/17 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:15 pm to LSUgrad08112
Nah i just like to remind Trumpsuckers that the presidents own son admitted to taking a meeting he thought was with a representativeof Russia in order foe them to back Trump in the election.
Im sorry that lends credibility to Muh Russians being a real thing.
Im sorry its making you melt all over the board like a busted up bitch.
Evening!
Im sorry that lends credibility to Muh Russians being a real thing.
Im sorry its making you melt all over the board like a busted up bitch.
Evening!
Posted on 7/25/17 at 12:21 am to AUbused
quote:
Nah i just like to remind Trumpsuckers that the presidents own son admitted to taking a meeting he thought was with a representativeof Russia in order foe them to back Trump in the election
do go on. The "presidents own son admitted to taking a meeting he thought was with a represtativeof Russia in order foe them to back Trump in the election", you say? Would you care to provide a link backing that claim? Or just an elaboration on how exactly "that meeting was designed to force the Russians into backing Trump"? quote:
Im sorry that lends credibility to Muh Russians being a real thing
it doesn't and I've already explained why it doesn't several times. I can see that reading isn't your strong suit. I've asked you several direct questions on your "views" and it seems like you just deflect every time and don't want to take a hard stance on any of them for some reason. quote:
Im sorry its making you melt all over the board like a busted up bitch
I'm not the one who devolved from an arrogant liberal smartass into barely being able to type a coherent sentence
I'm completely fine with how our little discussion went, you're the one who's typing like you're about to have an aneurism. Good evening to you too!
Posted on 7/25/17 at 1:09 am to canyon
quote:
Salty. Will allow.
Posted on 7/25/17 at 4:01 am to LSUgrad08112
quote:
You are not smart enough to differentiate between credible sources and media manipulation. It's fine. You've been duped.
Russia was gathering information through Kushner. They (Russia) arranged meetings in military/diplomatic ntelligence through Flynn. They also arranged undisclosed meetings through Kushner on economic sanctions.
All of which are public record now. June to December of 16 was open season for Russian intervention.
But yea, I was duped.
Posted on 7/25/17 at 4:11 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:Hillary lost the day she announced her candidacy
June to December of 16 was open season for Russian intervention.
Posted on 7/25/17 at 5:22 am to AUbused
quote:
Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government. It doesnt even matter if the whole thing was a ruse. Thats what they THOUGHT they were there for and it clearly shows that they were willing to work with the Russians.
shite for brains - it is your party that started the massive immigration in the 60's, and now we can't talk to the immigrants? She was Russian - that is all they could reasonably conclude without a meeting.
"Campaign altering information" when your opponent does it - "opposition research" when you do it. Typical lefty spin.
Oh - you left out the part about her having ties to the DNC before and after the meeting. Convenient. I guess if she does turn out to be "a direct agent of the Russian government", we will know where to look for collusion with Russia. Good thing for the DNC - collusion is not illegal. This whole Russian thing has probably affected the US relationship with Russia and there is something a little treasonous and a lot seditious about this shite storm you guys started.
This post was edited on 7/25/17 at 5:39 am
Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:07 am to LSUgrad08112
quote:
do go on. The "presidents own son admitted to taking a meeting he thought was with a represtativeof Russia in order foe them to back Trump in the election", you say? Would you care to provide a link backing that claim?
quote:
"This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump," Goldstone wrote in the email to Trump Jr. "If it's what you say I love it," Trump Jr. replied, according to the email he released.
Jr. Twitter Feed
Right there in black and white in Jr's own Twitter feed. The offer in bold is made and Jr. not only takes the meeting, but brings Manafort and Kushner. I didnt even think the hardest core Trumpsuckers would be so bold as to claim a meeting didnt exist after Trump Jr. said it existed, but Trumpsuckers never cease to amaze.
But please do keep melting....its delicious with my morning coffee.
Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:27 am to BamaFan365
quote:
There is proof of collusion. It's just not being reported by the msm.
Sure dude...Obama himself spied on Trump all through the general and up until he was sworn in...nothing,
"It's just being made up by the msm." FIFY...good stuff there. I bet you think Hilary is a sweet old lady who got screwed.
Posted on 7/25/17 at 8:39 am to AU_Right
quote:
I bet you think Hilary is a sweet old lady who got screwed.
Nope. I think she needs to be in jail. I edited my original post to include "The collusion has nothing to do with Trump and his administration."
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:01 am to AUbused
quote:
"This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump
This^ is not the same thing as "forcing Russia into supporting Trump". Again, I've already covered this with you. Nothing illegal or incriminating was implied there. If you're too stupid to remember it or were too lazy to read it or too dumb to understand what I said, then that's on you.
quote:
The offer in bold is made and Jr. not only takes the meeting, but brings Manafort and Kushner
And? Explain exactly how this is a problem legally please. Members of Trump's campaign can bring literally anyone to any meeting that they please as long as they're not doing anything illegal. This is what I was talking about earlier when I said that the MSM makes things sound scary so dipshits like you will freak out and start throwing around random baseless accusations
quote:
I didnt even think the hardest core Trumpsuckers would be so bold as to claim a meeting didnt exist after Trump Jr. said it existed
I literally have never once said or even implied that it didn't happen. It did happen. And it was a big ole nothingburger. Woman who happens to be Russian claims to have damaging info on Clinton ---> Trump Jr meets with her and nothing happens. That's it.
It's actually like the MSM is breeding human robots who are completely incapable of independent thought. This conversation is legitimately worrisome to me because I never would've thought that someone who can work a computer would be as stupid and oblivious as you are. You can't even look at raw data, hard evidence, and videos of CNN major players saying that the Trump Russia narrative is a lie and change your mind. You're are so sucked in to whatever fantasyland you're living in
Posted on 7/25/17 at 9:10 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
Russia was gathering information through Kushner. They (Russia) arranged meetings in military/diplomatic ntelligence through Flynn. They also arranged undisclosed meetings through Kushner on economic sanctions
So what you're saying is that it appears that Russia was trying to get the ball rolling on discussions and negotiations on a military and economic partnership with the candidate who wasn't a fricking looney bird whackjob who wanted to start a war with them? Shocking. Presidential candidates and their aides never meet with other countries! GOTCHA TRUMP!
quote:
All of which are public record now. June to December of 16 was open season for Russian intervention.
That's funny, what exactly do you mean by Russian intervention? What specifically did they intervene in and how did it help Trump? That's not a rhetorical question, please answer it directly, clearly, and in detail.
I'm willing to bet that you and every other libtard screeching about "Russian intervention" can't even answer that simple question, because if you understood what the media means by "collusion and Russian intervention" and actually dug into wikileaks and project veritas and listened to what wikileaks' founder, Julian Assange, had to say, then you wouldn't even be talking about this. You're a low information voter at his finest
Posted on 7/25/17 at 12:48 pm to BamaFan365
quote:
Nope. I think she needs to be in jail. I edited my original post to include "The collusion has nothing to do with Trump and his administration."
Ahhh...aite.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News