Started By
Message
locked post

Weekly reminder: There is ZERO proof of collusion

Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:19 am
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51807 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:19 am
Just our weekly PSA that all of this year long circle jerk has produced absolutely dick in regards to any tangible proof.

Please GTFO with the "how did we know what they've found" bullshite.

If these dupes would have found anything the NYT and WaPo would have it before Mueller did.

Continue your temper tantrum and making retards like Maxine "the missing link" Waters the face of your party and purple like Bob "American Badass" Ritchie are going to sneak up on you out of nowhere.


Y'all have a nice fricking day.
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 7:23 am
Posted by canyon
Member since Dec 2003
18431 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:20 am to
Salty.
Will allow.
Posted by BamaFan365
Member since Sep 2011
2347 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:21 am to
There is proof of collusion. It's just not being reported by the msm.

eta: The collusion has nothing to do with Trump and his administration.
This post was edited on 7/25/17 at 8:39 am
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:23 am to
They think the Jr. meeting is "proof" lol
Posted by tigerfootball10
Member since Sep 2005
9496 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:23 am to
quote:

any tangible proof.

Since when do the Democrats need this?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84876 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Please GTFO with the "how did we know what they've found" bullshite.

If these dupes would have found anything the NYT and WaPo would have it before Mueller did.


well thats a hell of an assumption
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40142 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:29 am to
quote:

There is ZERO proof of collusion


Place your bets folks. I'm betting that a Vandy v. ULM CFB championship game will happen before the dems find evidence of collusion.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84876 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:32 am to
I have no idea if there was or wasn't collusion, but pretending there's NO WAY it happened is just as myopic as liberals who are 100% convinced it did happen.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35639 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:32 am to
quote:

Weekly reminder: There is ZERO proof of collusion

And yet you continue to play along with the charade by making weekly posts about it.

This is exactly the distraction the establishment intends when it puts out such propaganda.

Why do you and The President insist upon playing along with it?
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50337 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:34 am to
quote:

well thats a hell of an assumption


Ok, It may have been CBS, NBC, or ABC.

Regardless he has a point.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32096 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:34 am to
Oh, there's ample proof of collusion....it's just involving the DNC's rigged primary.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:36 am to
quote:

There is proof of collusion. It's just not being reported by the msm.

Why would they report on their own collusion with, not only Russia, but the leftist democrat party???
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40142 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:37 am to
quote:

I have no idea if there was or wasn't collusion, but pretending there's NO WAY it happened is just as myopic as liberals who are 100% convinced it did happen.


I never said there was no way it happened. I just said that I think Vandy v ULM will happen before the dems find evidence.
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Weekly reminder: There is ZERO proof of collusion by bamarep


Yeah, and where oh where is the Dem server that was violated by Muh Russians?

Haven't they had a year to get something?
Posted by LSUgrad08112
Member since May 2016
2925 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:44 am to
quote:

There is proof of collusion. It's just not being reported by the msm

So you're saying that the MSM isn't reporting negative news on Trump? The same MSM that includes CNN, ABC, MSNBC, WAPO, and HUFFPO, all of which portray Trump negatively over 90% of the time? Harvard Study on Negative Trump Coverage

You people are fully delusional. For a group that gets off on calling conservatives "conspiracy theorists", libtards sure have taken the baton and run with the notion that there's a massive right wing conspiracy to "collude our election" with Russia, which was randomly started by Hillary Clinton in an attempt to discredit Trump's campaign. I still remember the first time that wacky, Parkinson's having bitch said "Trump met with the RUSSIANS O_o" and people ate it up.

And as a side note, you sound like a stupid uneducated frick when you use the word "collusion" as proof that Trump was doing something wrong. It's not illegal or even unethical to collude in the context that Trump supposedly did. And that's if he even did use the Russians to leak DNC emails, which he didn't and Julian Assange has verified several times. The only reason that the MSM is saying "collusion" over and over in regards to Trump is because Americans associate it with illegal business practices. It's a big mind game.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34958 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:45 am to
quote:

There is proof of collusion. It's just not being reported by the msm.


Yep, the elephant in the room. Chaffetz was on FNC this morn, and hammered Republicans on those Investigative Committees who tolerate the Dems bringing in Trump's folk...but would never bring in Chelsea Clinton, who is neck deep in the whole Clinton Foundation money laundering machine. A machine which boasts the sale of over one fifth of US Uranium with the Foundation being paid over a HUNDRED MILLION and Bill getting a HALF MILLION for a thirty minute 'speech'.

I'd go 'Colonel Slade' (Pacino/"Scent of a Woman") on that Bunch of low lifes! But I am more and more being convinced that the best course is for Meuller to come in with some petty, IRS/money charges against Trump folk - while ignoring Hillary's U-One deal - of the which Obama HAD to have signed off on - and for the outrage to become so loud with Trump doing weekly Rallies...that He brings the whole damn DC Cartel house crashing down.

The above may well be the only way we truly 'drain the swamp' of all those Deep State Operatives; especially those in the Intel Community. Otherwise, they stay, avoid justice...and continue to wreak havoc.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51807 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:51 am to
quote:

And yet you continue to play along with the charade by making weekly posts about it. 


Don't you need to mow the grass on top of your bunker or something?
Posted by LSUgrad08112
Member since May 2016
2925 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:54 am to
quote:

I have no idea if there was or wasn't collusion, but pretending there's NO WAY it happened is just as myopic as liberals who are 100% convinced it did happen.

The claim being made by liberals is that "Trump and the Russians colluded to hack the election". Seeing as how this is a general, idiotic statement, we'll just assume that they're trying to stay somewhat in reality and say that "Trump worked with the Russians to release the damaging DNC emails" and not something crazy like the Russians literally hacked our election machines.

Two problems: First, Julian Assange, the man who released the emails, has gone into great detail saying that the Russians weren't involved with those emails. He's pointed to someone inside of the DNC on several occasions and there's no reason to think he's not credible.

Second of all, for the media to say that the release of emails, I.E. raw data, is "hacking our election" is completely untrue. Just blatantly untrue and manipulating.

So yea, I can say with 100% certainly that the Russia narrative is bullshite based off of those simple facts. Anyone who believes it is a complete idiot
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:54 am to
quote:

have no idea if there was or wasn't collusion, but pretending there's NO WAY it happened is just as myopic as liberals who are 100% convinced it did happen.
not really. Thinking it possibly happened to this point is pure partisanship or stupidity. One of the two

I said it before and I'll repeat it again. If Trump was colluding with the Russians then one of two things is true

1 somehow despite the fact that the world's greatest intelligence agencies we're looking directly at him and his cohorts Trump managed to evade them acquiring Rock Solid evidence for at least eight months before Obama left office.

2. Obama was in on it

Hence it's pretty likely that number 3 is correct. They didn't find jackshit now they're fishing hoping to find something during the investigation to getting with even if it isn't actually Russia stuff
Posted by BamaFan365
Member since Sep 2011
2347 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:58 am to
quote:


Why would they report on their own collusion with, not only Russia, but the leftist democrat party???

Exactly
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram