- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
We won't bee free much longer because... we don't want to be free
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:31 am
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:31 am
Maga was outraged by the Social Media platforms censoring speech about covid, the election, etc.
Now they want to censor anti Israel speech.
The left doesn't care about the constitution. But I thought conservatives did.
You know there are political prisoner's in the US now right? Why would any of you support the government and big tech censoring anyone?
Is free speech à la carte?
Why would people who have been designated a "domestic terrorist" threat support this government in anything they do... ever?
Now they want to censor anti Israel speech.
The left doesn't care about the constitution. But I thought conservatives did.
You know there are political prisoner's in the US now right? Why would any of you support the government and big tech censoring anyone?
Is free speech à la carte?
Why would people who have been designated a "domestic terrorist" threat support this government in anything they do... ever?
17
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:36 am to RiverCityTider
quote:
Maga was outraged by the Social Media platforms censoring speech about covid, the election, etc.
Hell, we just saw a thread advocating for the unbanning of one of the sites best posters get whacked.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:36 am to RiverCityTider
Most Americans are too stupid to think beyond their own initial feelings.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:40 am to RiverCityTider
quote:
Now they want to censor anti Israel speech.
Where do you get this?
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:42 am to RiverCityTider
I am fine with them censoring Hamas linked social media accounts. Hamas is terrorist organization who has already killed countless thousands of people. Censoring them is a bit different than censoring Americans over election memes.
I've never had a problem with social media censoring propaganda linked directly to foreign governments. (I am talking accounts controlled directly by foreign governments, not some guy in Omaha falsely accused of being a Russian).
I've never had a problem with social media censoring propaganda linked directly to foreign governments. (I am talking accounts controlled directly by foreign governments, not some guy in Omaha falsely accused of being a Russian).
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:42 am to RogerTheShrubber
I would say most people on here were cheering on MTG for trying to censure Tlaib.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:43 am to AUstar
So, you are ok with censoring speech you dont like. Got it.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:44 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I would say most people on here were cheering on MTG for trying to censure Tlaib
Censure and censor are not the same thing.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:44 am to AUstar
quote:
I've never had a problem with social media censoring propaganda linked directly to foreign governments. (I am talking accounts controlled directly by foreign governments, not some guy in Omaha falsely accused of being a Russian).
Well, the problem there is the supposed experts lied about who were Russian bots. And Twitter knew it all along.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:48 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I would say most people on here were cheering on MTG for trying to censure Tlaib.
Maybe, but I dont see people wanting to censor her, which the guy stated.
I appreciate knowing who espouses terrible ideology, myself.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:49 am to RiverCityTider
Freedom isn’t free
There’s a hefty frickin fee
And if you won’t pay your buck o five
Who will?
There’s a hefty frickin fee
And if you won’t pay your buck o five
Who will?
This post was edited on 11/7/23 at 11:50 am
Posted on 11/7/23 at 11:57 am to RiverCityTider
quote:
Now they want to censor anti Israel speech.
How so?
This post was edited on 11/7/23 at 11:58 am
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:01 pm to RiverCityTider
quote:
Now they want to censor anti Israel speech.
Where are you seeing this?
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:11 pm to RiverCityTider
Antisemtic speech and writing should be allowed. When it is a specific violent call for action, it should not be. Pretty simple.
You can say frick the Jews but you can't add "this Tuesday by killing them on Main st".
I think "from The river to the sea" obviously has enough linguistic deniability to qualify as protected speech. Even though every intellectually honest person knows it is a way to say "Exterminate the Jews" with plausible deniability. It's like saying "Let me tell you about Mein Kampf". You may indeed be talking about your idyllic Pecker-wood life on the farm, even though we know it has another meaning. The State can't decide such things.
Also, there has to be room for parody and satire and using ironic language to prove a point. Like. "I'd like to Carpet bomb Hollywood" isn't a literal statement of intent. It's just a rhetorical lament.
You can say frick the Jews but you can't add "this Tuesday by killing them on Main st".
I think "from The river to the sea" obviously has enough linguistic deniability to qualify as protected speech. Even though every intellectually honest person knows it is a way to say "Exterminate the Jews" with plausible deniability. It's like saying "Let me tell you about Mein Kampf". You may indeed be talking about your idyllic Pecker-wood life on the farm, even though we know it has another meaning. The State can't decide such things.
Also, there has to be room for parody and satire and using ironic language to prove a point. Like. "I'd like to Carpet bomb Hollywood" isn't a literal statement of intent. It's just a rhetorical lament.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:17 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Antisemtic speech and writing should be allowed. When it is a specific violent call for action, it should not be. Pretty simple.
You can say frick the Jews but you can't add "this Tuesday by killing them on Main st".
I think "from The river to the sea" obviously has enough linguistic deniability to qualify as protected speech. Even though every intellectually honest person knows it is a way to say "Exterminate the Jews" with plausible deniability. It's like saying "Let me tell you about Mein Kampf". You may indeed be talking about your idyllic Pecker-wood life on the farm, even though we know it has another meaning. The State can't decide such things.
Also, there has to be room for parody and satire and using ironic language to prove a point. Like. "I'd like to Carpet bomb Hollywood" isn't a literal statement of intent. It's just a rhetorical lament.
Logical, rational, and well thought out responses like this never get the upvotes that absurd shitpost responses get on this site, but many of us appreciate them when they are posted.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:22 pm to lazlodawg
Those of you who aren't seeing this... it is there. It is happening on YouTube and X. All I can suggest is that you look for it.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:43 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Hell, we just saw a thread advocating for the unbanning of one of the sites best posters get whacked.
Who?
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:47 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Antisemtic speech and writing should be allowed.
quote:
"Antisemitism - Any perceived criticism or portrayal of an individual claiming Jewish heritage even if the genetic lineage is unproven or the alleged criticism is true."
Posted on 11/7/23 at 12:57 pm to RiverCityTider
We are currently in the phase of weak men make hard times phase of our societal development.
The only hope for us is to make sure that the constitutional structure of our goverment remains intact, and is restored, so that the hard times make stronger men (and women). There's really no other hope.
The only hope for us is to make sure that the constitutional structure of our goverment remains intact, and is restored, so that the hard times make stronger men (and women). There's really no other hope.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 1:06 pm to RiverCityTider
Same as the ppl who champion. The first and 2nd ammendment not acknowledging the 3rd and actively supporting Israel military who has forcibly quartered themselves in palestinians homes for decades. Only constitutional when convenient
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News