- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:50 pm to GooseSix
Wasn't where it was first reported. They were reluctant. After all, their talking heads (they have no real journalists) said he'd never do it.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:52 pm to GooseSix
Wait a second.
Obama is sending US military forces to conduct an armed attack against a ME nation WITHOUT the approval of the UN Security Council?
Isn't this exactly what the Democraps bash Bush for?
Obama is sending US military forces to conduct an armed attack against a ME nation WITHOUT the approval of the UN Security Council?
Isn't this exactly what the Democraps bash Bush for?
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:54 pm to TT9
quote:
Wasn't where it was first reported.
How do you know? It was the first website that I saw it on, ahead of Yahoo, CBSNews.com, NBCNews, and nola.com.
So Fox was first that I saw.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:54 pm to TT9
Please don't be like the biased networks themselves by falling into the trap of speaking in absolutes.
Bret Baier, Brit Hume and Chris Wallace are real journalists.
Bret Baier, Brit Hume and Chris Wallace are real journalists.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:54 pm to TT9
quote:
Obama.
Obama's armed attack on Syria violates International Law because the UN Security Council hasn't provided the necessary permission.
Does this concern you, given your hysterical reaction to the time when Bush did something similar?
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:54 pm to Champagne
quote:no, we bash Bush for feeding us full of lies and starting this mess. Keep up.
Isn't this exactly what the Democraps bash Bush for?
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:55 pm to Jwho77
quote:aaaand that's where the list ends.
Bret Baier, Brit Hume and Chris Wallace are real journalists
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:57 pm to GooseSix
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:58 pm to TT9
Aaaannd you are still wrong for saying there weren't any before. 
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:58 pm to Champagne
quote:
Obama is sending US military forces to conduct an armed attack against a ME nation WITHOUT the approval of the UN Security Council?
Isn't this exactly what the Democraps bash Bush for?
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:59 pm to Champagne
quote:
Does this concern you, given your hysterical reaction to the time when Bush did something similar?
No bush committed us to military action against a nation that was not one threat to us in any way.
Setting up the mess the mid east is currently in.
Try to read once in a while.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 8:59 pm to asurob1
Will be interesting to see the defenders here on the side of Assad
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:00 pm to Champagne
quote:
Posted by Champagne
Wait a second.
Obama is sending US military forces to conduct an armed attack against a ME nation WITHOUT the approval of the UN Security Council?
Isn't this exactly what the Democraps bash Bush for?
Hey inspector gadget, everybody bashed bush.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:00 pm to asurob1
quote:
No bush committed us to military action against a nation that was not one threat to us
What threat is Syria to the U.S.?
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:01 pm to asurob1
quote:and Boom!!!!!
No bush committed us to military action against a nation that was not one threat to us in any way.
Setting up the mess the mid east is currently in.
Try to read once in a while.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:04 pm to asurob1
quote:
No bush committed us to military action against a nation that was not one threat to us in any way.
Under the UN Charter, my friend, the ONLY LEGAL armed attacks against nations are those attacks sanctioned by the UN Security Council.
Bush actually had an earlier UN resolution permitting military action against Iraq that he could arguably use to permit his armed attack on Saddam's Iraq.
What are Obama's legal grounds, under the UN Charter, to conduct these armed attacks on Syria?
Why are Democraps and LibTurds openly applauding Obama for doing the exact same thing that Bush did, except that Obama's legal grounds might be weaker than Bush's.
I'm simply pointing out the utter hypocrisy of the Obama-Bots of the world -- the utter hypocrisy.
And believe me, this is not a revelation to any informed person, because everybody in the universe knows that Libs, Democraps and Obama-bots are the most disingenuous and hypocritical people there are.
This post was edited on 9/22/14 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:05 pm to LSURussian
quote:
What threat is Syria to the U.S.?
Last I checked everyone is scared of ISIS.
Shouldn't you be digging trenches in Ukraine right now?
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:09 pm to asurob1
quote:
Last I checked everyone is scared of ISIS.
That's not a legal basis for conducting Armed Attacks against Syria under International Law. Obama's ignoring the UN Charter.
Your hypocrisy needs to be pointed out.
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:10 pm to tracytiger
quote:
Who was the poster that said plane after plane was leaving Barksdale and flying over his house a few days ago? He said they haven't left like that since Iraq. I guess he was right.
Whoever it was, they were wrong.
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News